Anyone for Bowling?: Coalescing for Shared Activities

Despite the importance of individuals coming together for social group-activities (e.g. pick-up volleyball, chess clubs), the process by which such groups coalesce is poorly understood. Existing theories focus on adoption and contribution rates, group types, and the formation of group norms, as opposed to the processes involved in initial group coalescence. We address this gap in the literature through an interview study examining: 1) how well people's needs for social group activity engagement are being met; 2) the challenges they face in finding and participating in, and; 3) leading interest-based group activities. Our findings highlight how people-s needs are not being addressed by current technologies. In particular, they place a heavy burden on individuals to step forward into leadership positions where the return they will receive for their efforts is often unknown, or extremely limited. We discuss the implications of our findings for the design of interest-based group coalescing technology.

[1]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Predicting Continued Participation in Newsgroups , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[2]  Yuanyuan Tian,et al.  Event-based social networks: linking the online and offline social worlds , 2012, KDD.

[3]  D. Russell,et al.  Adult Attachment, Social Self-Efficacy, Self-Disclosure, Loneliness, and Subsequent Depression for Freshman College Students: A Longitudinal Study , 2005 .

[4]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Follow the (slash) dot: effects of feedback on new members in an online community , 2005, GROUP.

[5]  B. Latané,et al.  The Unresponsive Bystander: Why Doesn't He Help? , 1972 .

[6]  Robert Sugden,et al.  Collective Intentions And Team Agency , 2007 .

[7]  Vanessa Paz Dennen,et al.  Pedagogical lurking: Student engagement in non-posting discussion behavior , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[8]  R. Merton.  Social Theory and Social Structure , 1958 .

[9]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  A face(book) in the crowd: social Searching vs. social browsing , 2006, CSCW '06.

[10]  J. Coleman,et al.  Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital , 1988, American Journal of Sociology.

[11]  S. Fiske,et al.  Social Psychology , 2019, Encyclopedia of Personality and Individual Differences.

[12]  Sato Ashida,et al.  Social Networks and Participation in Social Activities at a New Senior Center: Reaching Out to Older Adults Who Could Benefit the Most , 2008 .

[13]  Deborah A. Prentice,et al.  Asymmetries in Attachments to Groups and to their Members: Distinguishing between Common-Identity and Common-Bond Groups , 1994 .

[14]  Robin Burke,et al.  Experience Discovery: hybrid recommendation of student activities using social network data , 2011, HetRec '11.

[15]  Fred H. Blum,et al.  Action Research--A Scientific Approach? , 1955, Philosophy of Science.

[16]  Quentin Jones,et al.  Virtual-Communities, Virtual Settlements & Cyber-Archaeology: A Theoretical Outline , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[17]  L. S. Shapley,et al.  College Admissions and the Stability of Marriage , 2013, Am. Math. Mon..

[18]  Megan A. Moreno,et al.  Exploring Depression Symptom References on Facebook among College Freshmen: A Mixed Methods Approach , 2013 .

[19]  J. Helliwell,et al.  The social context of well-being. , 2004, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[20]  R. Tuomela.  We-Intentions Revisited , 2005 .

[21]  B. Tuckman.  DEVELOPMENTAL SEQUENCE IN SMALL GROUPS. , 1965, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  Sukeshini A. Grandhi,et al.  Hello Stranger! A Study of Introductory Communication Structure and Social Match Success , 2009, 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[23]  Irina Shklovski,et al.  The Internet and Social Participation: Contrasting Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Analyses , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[24]  Sandra L. Calvert,et al.  College students' social networking experiences on Facebook , 2009 .

[25]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  FEATURESocial network sites and society: current trends and future possibilities , 2009, INTR.

[26]  Эшфорт Блейк,et al.  Social identity theory and the organization , 2012 .

[27]  L. Shapley,et al.  Stable Allocations and the Practice of Market Design , 2013 .

[28]  Katelyn Y. A. McKenna,et al.  The internet and social life. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[29]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Applying Common Identity and Bond Theory to Design of Online Communities , 2007 .

[30]  J. Coleman,et al.  Foundations for a Theory of Collective Decisions , 1966, American Journal of Sociology.

[31]  Starr Roxanne Hiltz,et al.  Network Nation: Human Communication Via Computer , 1979 .

[32]  Kerk F. Kee,et al.  Being Immersed in Social Networking Environment: Facebook Groups, Uses and Gratifications, and Social Outcomes , 2009, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[33]  H. Tajfel.  Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology , 1981 .

[34]  G. Marwell,et al.  A Theory of the Critical Mass. I. Interdependence, Group Heterogeneity, and the Production of Collective Action , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[35]  W. Adger,et al.  Social Capital, Collective Action, and Adaptation to Climate Change , 2003 .

[36]  M. Olson,et al.  The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups , 1969 .

[37]  B. Tuckman,et al.  Stages of Small-Group Development Revisited , 1977 .

[38]  F. Reid.  Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory , 1987 .