Conversational Agents as Group-Teacher Interaction Mediators in MOOCs

This paper presents the colMOOC project perspective for integrating a conversational agent service in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) to facilitate peer dialogue during chat-based activities. Furthermore, it provides high level system architecture to highlight key aspects of the technology infrastructure and the functionality of the software system. The rationale of the approach follows the tenets of several converging theoretical perspectives emphasizing the value of learners' dialogue and constructive argumentation as knowledge building processes during collaborative activities. The MOOC teacher (domain expert) is expected to play a key role by entering in the system conceptual links that guide the agent to make relevant questioning interventions. Thus, the agent tool is mediating group-teacher interactions in a MOOC environment aiming to increase the transactive quality of peer dialogue. The paper discusses also the ‘Academically Productive Talk’ model that provides the basis for the agent interventions and the major software components of the system, including the colMOOC Editor and the colMOOC Player.

[1]  S. Michaels,et al.  Deliberative Discourse Idealized and Realized: Accountable Talk in the Classroom and in Civic Life , 2008 .

[2]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Challenges and Opportunities of Dual-Layer MOOCs: Reflections from an edX Deployment Study , 2015 .

[3]  Kenneth R. Koedinger,et al.  Designing automated adaptive support to improve student helping behaviors in a peer tutoring activity , 2011, Int. J. Comput. Support. Collab. Learn..

[4]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Positive Impact of Collaborative Chat Participation in an edX MOOC , 2015, AIED.

[5]  P. Dillenbourg What do you mean by collaborative learning , 1999 .

[6]  F. Fischer,et al.  Toward a Script Theory of Guidance in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning , 2013, Educational psychologist.

[7]  Hossam Haick,et al.  Motivation to learn in massive open online courses: Examining aspects of language and social engagement , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[8]  Alejandra Martínez-Monés,et al.  From Low-Scale to Collaborative, Gamified and Massive-Scale Courses: Redesigning a MOOC , 2017, EMOOCs.

[9]  Gráinne Conole,et al.  MOOCs as disruptive technologies: strategies for enhancing the learner experience and quality of MOOCs Los MOOC como tecnologías disruptivas: estrategias para mejorar la experiencia de aprendizaje y la calidad de los MOOC. , 2016 .

[10]  Gary Boyd Reflections on the conversation theory of Gordon Pask , 2001 .

[11]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Towards an Agile Approach to Adapting Dynamic Collaboration Support to Student Needs , 2014, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.

[12]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Architecture for Building Conversational Agents that Support Collaborative Learning , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[13]  Karsten Stegmann,et al.  Learning to argue online: Scripted groups surpass individuals (unscripted groups do not) , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[14]  Kelly A Bellamy Accountable Talk as a Strategy to Increase Reading Comprehension for All Children , 2016 .

[15]  Stavros N. Demetriadis,et al.  Conversational Agents Improve Peer Learning through Building on Prior Knowledge , 2017, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[16]  L. Resnick,et al.  A framework for analyzing development of argumentation through classroom discussions , 2012 .

[17]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  Adapting Collaborative Chat for Massive Open Online Courses: Lessons Learned , 2015, AIED Workshops.

[18]  Carolyn Penstein Rosé,et al.  “ Turn on , Tune in , Drop out ” : Anticipating student dropouts in Massive Open Online Courses , 2013 .