Surgical treatments for women with stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review of economic evidence

[1]  C. Chapple.  Contemporary surgical management of stress urinary incontinence. , 2020, Current opinion in urology.

[2]  J. Higgins,et al.  Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions , 2010, International Coaching Psychology Review.

[3]  M. Javanbakht,et al.  Surgical treatments for women with stress urinary incontinence: the ESTER systematic review and economic evaluation. , 2019, Health technology assessment.

[4]  B. Opmeer,et al.  Heterogeneity of cost estimates in health economic evaluation research. A systematic review of stress urinary incontinence studies , 2019, International Urogynecology Journal.

[5]  M. Robert,et al.  Surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence–trans‐obturator tape compared with tension‐free vaginal tape–5‐year follow up: an economic evaluation , 2017, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[6]  B. Prendergast,et al.  The Cost-Effectiveness of Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Patients at Risk of Infective Endocarditis , 2016, Circulation.

[7]  B. Prendergast,et al.  Abstract 15628: The Use of Antibiotic Prophylaxis to Prevent Infective Endocarditis is Cost Effective , 2016 .

[8]  Karl Claxton,et al.  Unrelated Future Costs and Unrelated Future Benefits: Reflections on NICE Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal. , 2016, Health economics.

[9]  M. Rutten-van Mölken,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness of Including a Nurse Specialist in the Treatment of Urinary Incontinence in Primary Care in the Netherlands , 2015, PloS one.

[10]  D. Patterson,et al.  Cost Utility of the Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence , 2015, Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery.

[11]  J. Blomquist,et al.  Cost Utility Analysis of Urethral Bulking Agents Versus Midurethral Sling in Stress Urinary Incontinence , 2015, Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery.

[12]  Á. Hidalgo,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Surgical Management of Stress Urinary Incontinence With Single-Incision Mini-Sling Versus Tension-Free Vaginal Obturator in Spain. , 2014, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[13]  M. Richardson,et al.  A cost-effectiveness analysis of conservative versus surgical management for the initial treatment of stress urinary incontinence. , 2014, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[14]  S. Kaplan,et al.  A cost‐effectiveness analysis of retropubic midurethral sling versus transobturator midurethral sling for female stress urinary incontinence , 2014, Neurourology and urodynamics.

[15]  V. Bini,et al.  Managing female urinary incontinence: a regional prospective analysis of cost-utility ratios (curs) and effectiveness. , 2014, Archivio italiano di urologia, andrologia : organo ufficiale [di] Societa italiana di ecografia urologica e nefrologica.

[16]  M. Richardson,et al.  A cost-effectiveness analysis of conservative versus surgical management for the initial treatment of stress urinary incontinence. , 2014, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[17]  M. Kilonzo,et al.  Comparison of an adjustable anchored single‐incision mini‐sling, Ajust®, with a standard mid‐urethral sling, TVT‐OTM: a health economic evaluation , 2013, BJU international.

[18]  J. Cabasés,et al.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of the surgical treatment of female urinary incontinence using slings and meshes. , 2013, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[19]  P. Sand,et al.  Cost effectiveness of radiofrequency microremodeling for stress urinary incontinence , 2013, International Urogynecology Journal.

[20]  S. Kaplan,et al.  Cost‐effectiveness analysis of tension‐free vaginal tape vs burch colposuspension for female stress urinary incontinence in the USA , 2013, BJU international.

[21]  M. Drummond,et al.  Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) Statement , 2013, PharmacoEconomics.

[22]  M. Drummond,et al.  Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement. , 2013, BMJ.

[23]  Džanić Hana,et al.  Assessment of Clinical Effectiveness and EconomicViability of the Obturator Tension Free Vaginal Tape Method for the Treatment of Stress UrinaryIncontinence by Cost Benefit Analysis , 2012 .

[24]  M. Robert,et al.  Trans‐obturator tape compared with tension‐free vaginal tape in the surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a cost utility analysis , 2011, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[25]  M. Oremus,et al.  An economic evaluation of surgery versus collagen injection for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. , 2010, The Canadian journal of urology.

[26]  E. Tacconelli.  Systematic reviews: CRD's guidance for undertaking reviews in health care , 2010 .

[27]  P. Jacklin,et al.  Analytic model comparing the cost utility of TVT versus duloxetine in women with urinary stress incontinence , 2010, International Urogynecology Journal.

[28]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[29]  Jennifer M Wu,et al.  Is Burch colposuspension ever cost-effective compared with tension-free vaginal tape for stress incontinence? , 2007, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[30]  P. Rissanen,et al.  A cost‐effectiveness analysis of tension‐free vaginal tape versus laparoscopic mesh colposuspension for primary female stress incontinence , 2006, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[31]  A. Manca,et al.  Cost‐effectiveness analysis of open colposuspension versus laparoscopic colposuspension in the treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence , 2006, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[32]  L. Bamber,et al.  An evaluation of the cost-effectiveness of duloxetine as a treatment for women with moderate-to-severe stress urinary incontinence , 2006 .

[33]  A. Grant,et al.  Cost effectiveness of tension-free vaginal tape for the surgical management of female stress incontinence , 2004, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[34]  F. Sendag,et al.  Laparoscopic burch colposuspension: comparison of effectiveness of extraperitoneal and transperitoneal techniques. , 2004, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[35]  S. Hunskaar,et al.  The prevalence of urinary incontinence in women in four European countries , 2004, BJU international.

[36]  M. Oremus,et al.  Surgery versus collagen for female stress urinary incontinence: economic assessment in Ontario and Quebec. , 2003, The Canadian journal of urology.

[37]  M. Sculpher,et al.  A cost–utility analysis of tension‐free vaginal tape versus colposuspension for primary urodynamic stress incontinence , 2003, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[38]  M. Fall,et al.  The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. , 2002 .

[39]  Magnus Fall,et al.  The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the International Continence Society. , 2003, Urology.

[40]  A. Weber,et al.  Burch Procedure Compared With Sling for Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Decision Analysis , 2000, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[41]  S Hunskaar,et al.  A community-based epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence: the Norwegian EPINCONT study. Epidemiology of Incontinence in the County of Nord-Trøndelag. , 2000, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[42]  C. Kennedy,et al.  Laparoscopic colposuspension , 1997, Surgical Endoscopy.

[43]  T O Jefferson,et al.  Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ , 1996, BMJ.

[44]  R. Kung,et al.  The cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic versus abdominal Burch procedures in women with urinary stress incontinence. , 1996, The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists.

[45]  Hilde van der Togt,et al.  Publisher's Note , 2003, J. Netw. Comput. Appl..

[46]  M. Fall,et al.  The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. , 2002, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.