Quantifying long-range correlations and 1/f patterns in a minimal experiment of social interaction

In recent years, researchers in social cognition have found the “perceptual crossing paradigm” to be both a theoretical and practical advance toward meeting particular challenges. This paradigm has been used to analyze the type of interactive processes that emerge in minimal interactions and it has allowed progress toward understanding of the principles of social cognition processes. In this paper, we analyze whether some critical aspects of these interactions could not have been observed by previous studies. We consider alternative indicators that could complete, or even lead us to rethink, the current interpretation of the results obtained from both experimental and simulated modeling in the fields of social interactions and minimal perceptual crossing. In particular, we discuss the possibility that previous experiments have been analytically constrained to a short-term dynamic type of player response. Additionally, we propose the possibility of considering these experiments from a more suitable framework based on the use and analysis of long-range correlations and fractal dynamics. We will also reveal evidence supporting the idea that social interactions are deployed along many scales of activity. Specifically, we propose that the fractal structure of the interactions could be a more adequate framework to understand the type of social interaction patterns generated in a social engagement.

[1]  Julie A. Jacko Ambient, ubiquitous and intelligent interaction , 2009 .

[2]  H. D. Jaegher,et al.  Social understanding through direct perception? Yes, by interacting , 2009, Consciousness and Cognition.

[3]  Henrik Jeldtoft Jensen,et al.  Self-Organized Criticality , 1998 .

[4]  Tang,et al.  Self-Organized Criticality: An Explanation of 1/f Noise , 2011 .

[5]  Nick Hammond,et al.  HUMAN COGNITION , 1986 .

[6]  Charles Lenay,et al.  “You never fail to surprise me”: the hallmark of the Other: Experimental study and simulations of perceptual crossing , 2011 .

[7]  D. Gilden Cognitive emissions of 1/f noise. , 2001, Psychological review.

[8]  J. Kelso,et al.  Tackling the social cognition paradox through multi-scale approaches , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[9]  Beatrix Vereijken,et al.  Interaction-dominant dynamics in human cognition: beyond 1/f(alpha) fluctuation. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  Viktor Müller,et al.  Intra- and Inter-Brain Synchronization during Musical Improvisation on the Guitar , 2013, PloS one.

[11]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Self-Organized Biological Dynamics and Nonlinear Control: Fractal mechanisms in neuronal control: human heartbeat and gait dynamics in health and disease , 2000 .

[12]  M. Auvray,et al.  Perceptual interactions in a minimalist virtual environment , 2009 .

[13]  G. Fink,et al.  It's in your eyes--using gaze-contingent stimuli to create truly interactive paradigms for social cognitive and affective neuroscience. , 2010, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[14]  Hideyuki Ando,et al.  Experimental study on co-evolution of categorical perception and communication systems in humans , 2012, Psychological Research.

[15]  G. V. van Orden,et al.  Self-organization of cognitive performance. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[16]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  Estimation and interpretation of 1/fα noise in human cognition , 2004 .

[17]  M. Rohde,et al.  Sensitivity to social contingency or stability of interaction? Modelling the dynamics of perceptual crossing , 2008 .

[18]  Hiroyuki Iizuka,et al.  Adaptability and Diversity in Simulated Turn-taking Behavior , 2003, Artificial Life.

[19]  Line Garnero,et al.  Inter-Brain Synchronization during Social Interaction , 2010, PloS one.

[20]  Simon Farrell,et al.  Abstract Concepts Require Concrete Models: Why Cognitive Scientists Have Not Yet Embraced Nonlinearly Coupled, Dynamical, Self-Organized Critical, Synergistic, Scale-Free, Exquisitely Context-Sensitive, Interaction-Dominant, Multifractal, Interdependent Brain-Body-Niche Systems , 2012, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[21]  V. Reddy How Infants Know Minds , 2008 .

[22]  Jan W. Kantelhardt Fractal and Multifractal Time Series , 2009, Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science.

[23]  Tom Froese,et al.  Embodied social interaction constitutes social cognition in pairs of humans: A minimalist virtual reality experiment , 2014, Scientific Reports.

[24]  E. D. Paolo,et al.  Can social interaction constitute social cognition? , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[25]  Hideyuki Ando,et al.  The Anticipation of Human Behavior Using "Parasitic Humanoid" , 2009, HCI.

[26]  Tom Froese,et al.  Using minimal human-computer interfaces for studying the interactive development of social awareness , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[27]  H. Laborit,et al.  [Experimental study]. , 1958, Bulletin mensuel - Societe de medecine militaire francaise.

[28]  Hanne De Jaegher Social understanding through direct perception? Yes, by interacting. , 2009, Consciousness and cognition.

[29]  Daniel Mirman,et al.  Multifractal Dynamics in the Emergence of Cognitive Structure , 2012, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[30]  G. V. van Orden,et al.  Human cognition and 1/f scaling. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[31]  Jeffrey M. Hausdorff,et al.  Multiscaled randomness: A possible source of 1/f noise in biology. , 1996, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[32]  Hiroyuki Iizuka,et al.  Minimal Agency Detection of Embodied Agents , 2007, ECAL.

[33]  Henrik Jeldtoft Jensen,et al.  Self-Organized Criticality: Emergent Complex Behavior in Physical and Biological Systems , 1998 .

[34]  M. Quyen The brainweb of cross-scale interactions , 2011 .