Contributors to exchange structures and their effects on community solidarity in online communities

The purpose of this paper is to investigate which exchange structure, direct or generalized exchange, better promotes community solidarity in online communities (OCs). Furthermore, it examines the moderating effects of activity intensity on the relationship between exchange structure and community solidarity in order to resolve the conflicts in extant literature.,The research model is developed based on the social exchange theory (SET). It also accommodates social structures as determinants of exchange structure, such as organizational identity orientation (OIO) and distributive justice norms. Data in this study were collected from 376 OCs through an e-mail survey.,Generalized exchange has stronger effects on community solidarity than direct exchange. Furthermore, there was a significant difference in the impact on community solidarity between generalized exchange and direct exchange at high-activity intensity levels, whereas no significant differences were found at low-activity intensity conditions. OIO significantly influences exchange structure. Additionally, equality norm significantly influences generalized exchange, whereas need norm significantly influences direct exchange.,In information systems research, there have not been any attempts to identify the determinants of exchange structure in OCs. Furthermore, only a couple of studies have empirically investigated the relationship between exchange structure and OC solidarity, and yet they found conflicting results. This research makes contributions to an enhancement of theoretical precision of the SET in two ways: by empirically examining the determinants of exchange structure, and by introducing a third variable, activity intensity, as a moderator of the relationship between exchange structure and OC solidarity.

[1]  Ofer Harel,et al.  Partial F‐tests with multiply imputed data in the linear regression framework via coefficient of determination , 2015, Statistics in medicine.

[2]  K. Cook,et al.  Two Approaches to Social Structure: Exchange Theory and Network Analysis , 1992 .

[3]  Chen Zhang,et al.  Research Note - Continued Participation in Online Innovation Communities: Does Community Response Matter Equally for Everyone? , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[4]  C. Manolis,et al.  A Measure of Distributive Justice in Distribution Channels: Scale Development and Validation , 2008 .

[5]  Jenny Preece,et al.  Online Communities: Designing Usability and Supporting Sociability , 2000 .

[6]  LimJohn,et al.  Retaining and attracting users in social networking services , 2014 .

[7]  S. Manel,et al.  Environmental DNA illuminates the dark diversity of sharks , 2018, Science Advances.

[8]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Construct Measurement and Validation Procedures in MIS and Behavioral Research: Integrating New and Existing Techniques , 2011, MIS Q..

[9]  Qun Zhao,et al.  Determinants of backers' funding intention in crowdfunding: Social exchange theory and regulatory focus , 2017, Telematics Informatics.

[10]  P. Blau.  Exchange and Power in Social Life , 1964 .

[11]  Sheila Hsuan-Yu Hsu,et al.  Predicting good deeds in virtual communities of consumption: The cross-level interactions of individual differences and member citizenship behaviors , 2016, Internet Res..

[12]  B. Weiner.  An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. , 1985, Psychological review.

[13]  R. Bies,et al.  The Study of Revenge in the Workplace: Conceptual, Ideological, and Empirical Issues. , 2005 .

[14]  C. Lévi-Strauss.  The Elementary Structures of Kinship , 1969 .

[15]  Nicolai J. Foss,et al.  Authority in the Context of Distributed Knowledge , 2003 .

[16]  K. Boudreau,et al.  How to Manage Outside Innovation , 2009 .

[17]  Bing-Sheng Teng,et al.  Alliance Constellations: A Social Exchange Perspective , 2002 .

[18]  J. Coleman.  Foundations of Social Theory , 1990 .

[19]  Shelley L. Brickson.  Organizational identity orientation: The genesis of the role of the firm and distinct forms of social value , 2007 .

[20]  E. Sabourin.  Education, gift and reciprocity: a preliminary discussion , 2013 .

[21]  Han Zhang,et al.  Knowledge sharing in online health communities: A social exchange theory perspective , 2016, Inf. Manag..

[22]  Robin L. Wakefield,et al.  Social media network behavior: A study of user passion and affect , 2016, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[23]  M. Deutsch.  Equity, Equality, and Need: What Determines Which Value Will Be Used as the Basis of Distributive Justice? , 1975 .

[24]  B. Weiner.  An attributional theory of motivation and emotion , 1986 .

[25]  Joon Koh,et al.  Encouraging participation in virtual communities , 2007, CACM.

[26]  S. Chatterjee,et al.  Regression Analysis by Example , 1979 .

[27]  M. Mäkelä,et al.  Employee Sensemaking on the Importance of Sustainability Reporting in Sustainability Identity Change , 2018 .

[28]  Traci Carte,et al.  In Pursuit of Moderation: Nine Common Errors and Their Solutions , 2003, MIS Q..

[29]  Deborah A. Prentice,et al.  Asymmetries in Attachments to Groups and to their Members: Distinguishing between Common-Identity and Common-Bond Groups , 1994 .

[30]  Alexander Hars,et al.  Web Based Knowledge Infrastructures for the Sciences: An Adaptive Document , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[31]  T. D. Kemper,et al.  A social interactional theory of emotions , 1978 .

[32]  Soumya Ray,et al.  The Central Role of Engagement in Online Communities , 2014, Inf. Syst. Res..

[33]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Applying Common Identity and Bond Theory to Design of Online Communities , 2007 .

[34]  Atreyi Kankanhalli,et al.  Are norms enough? The role of collaborative norms in promoting organizational knowledge seeking , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[35]  E. Lawler.  An Affect Theory of Social Exchange1 , 2001, American Journal of Sociology.

[36]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Building Member Attachment in Online Communities: Applying Theories of Group Identity and Interpersonal Bonds , 2012, MIS Q..

[37]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Network Exchange Patterns in Online Communities , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[38]  K. Cook,et al.  Social Exchange Theory , 1989, Theoretical Sociology.

[39]  D. M. Pedersen.  PSYCHOLOGICAL FUNCTIONS OF PRIVACY , 1997 .

[40]  John Lim,et al.  Retaining and attracting users in social networking services: An empirical investigation of cyber migration , 2014, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[41]  Francis J. Flynn.  Identity Orientations And Forms Of Social Exchange In Organizations , 2005 .

[42]  Rolph E. Anderson,et al.  Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings , 1979 .

[43]  Sonia M. Goltz,et al.  Beyond Social Exchange Theory: An Integrative Look at Transcendent Mental Models for Engagement , 2012 .

[44]  W. Gardner,et al.  Circle of Friends or Members of a Group? Sex Differences in Relational and Collective Attachment to Groups , 2003 .

[45]  N. Takahashi.  The Emergence of Generalized Exchange , 2000, American Journal of Sociology.

[46]  J. Fleiss,et al.  Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. , 1979, Psychological bulletin.

[47]  Samer Faraj,et al.  Emergence of Power Laws in Online Communities: The Role of Social Mechanisms and Preferential Attachment , 2014, MIS Q..

[48]  Lenahan O'Connell,et al.  An Exploration of Exchange in Three Social Relationships: Kinship, Friendship and the Marketplace , 1984 .

[49]  Shelley L. Brickson.  Organizational Identity Orientation: Forging a Link between Organizational Identity and Organizations' Relations with Stakeholders , 2005 .

[50]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[51]  Linda D. Molm,et al.  Power in Negotiated and Reciprocal Exchange , 1999, American Sociological Review.

[52]  Ting-Peng Liang,et al.  Can Social Exchange Theory Explain Individual Knowledge-Sharing Behavior? A Meta-Analysis , 2008, ICIS.

[53]  F. Hayek.  The economic nature of the firm: The use of knowledge in society , 1945 .

[54]  David R Schaefer,et al.  Conflict and Fairness in Social Exchange , 2006 .

[55]  Robin Teigland,et al.  The provision of online public goods: Examining social structure in an electronic network of practice , 2009, Decis. Support Syst..

[56]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[57]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[58]  Edward J. Lawler,et al.  Social Exchange and Micro Social Order , 2008 .

[59]  Shiu-Wan Hung,et al.  Fostering the determinants of knowledge sharing in professional virtual communities , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[60]  P. Ekeh,et al.  Social Exchange Theory: The Two Traditions. , 1975 .

[61]  Fan-Chuan Tseng,et al.  The way we share and learn: An exploratory study of the self-regulatory mechanisms in the professional online learning community , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[62]  R. Collins.  Stratification, emotional energy, and the transient emotions. , 1990 .

[63]  Reija Sihlman.  The perceived benefits of online community participation and their effect on consumer commitment to ethical consumption (Available on Internet) , 2012 .

[64]  Shelley L. Brickson.  Re-assessing the standard: The expansive positive potential of a relational identity in diverse organizations , 2008 .

[65]  David R. Schaefer,et al.  Building Solidarity through Generalized Exchange: A Theory of Reciprocity1 , 2007, American Journal of Sociology.

[66]  Meiyun Zuo,et al.  How fundamental and supplemental interactions affect users' knowledge sharing in virtual communities? A social cognitive perspective , 2014, Internet Res..

[67]  Ho Lee,et al.  Impact of Anonymity on Information Sharing through Internal Psychological Processes: A Case of South Korean Online Communities , 2014, J. Glob. Inf. Manag..

[68]  David Gefen,et al.  Virtual Community Attraction: Why People Hang Out Online , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[69]  Stephen S. Tax,et al.  Customer Evaluations of Service Complaint Experiences: Implications for Relationship Marketing: , 1998 .

[70]  S. Haynes,et al.  Content validity in psychological assessment: A functional approach to concepts and methods. , 1995 .

[71]  Erica L. Anthony,et al.  Social Exchange Theory: A Critical Review with Theoretical Remedies , 2017 .

[72]  Sharon Swee-Lin Tan,et al.  Contribution Behaviors in Distributed Environments , 2008, MIS Q..

[73]  Satoshi Kanazawa,et al.  SOCIOLOGICAL RATIONAL CHOICE THEORY , 1997, Rational Choice Sociology.

[74]  Chun-Ming Chang,et al.  What motivates health information exchange in social media? The roles of the social cognitive theory and perceived interactivity , 2018, Inf. Manag..

[75]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  A N A TTRACTION –S ELECTION –A TTRITION T HEORY OF O NLINE C OMMUNITY S IZE AND R ESILIENCE 1 , 2014 .

[76]  Francis J. Flynn,et al.  Structure, Identity, and Solidarity , 2012 .

[77]  Gerald C. Kane,et al.  What's Different about Social Media Networks? A Framework and Research Agenda , 2014, MIS Q..

[78]  Tao Wang,et al.  Understanding Investment Intention Towards Social Lending - - Based on Social Exchange Theory , 2017, PACIS.

[79]  Paul M. de Graaf,et al.  The impact of social and human capital on the income attainment of Dutch managers , 1991 .

[80]  Anthony F. Heath,et al.  Rational Choice and Social Exchange: A Critique of Exchange Theory , 1976 .

[81]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. , 1998 .

[82]  R. Cropanzano,et al.  Social Exchange Theory: An Interdisciplinary Review , 2005 .