Team situation awareness within the context of human-autonomy teaming

Abstract Effective team communication, a fundamental part of team coordination, is crucial for both effective Team Situation Awareness (TSA) and team performance. In this study, we looked at the role that team interaction (i.e., more specifically team verbal behaviors) played in TSA and team performance in order to better understand Human-Autonomy Teaming (HAT). We first analyzed team verbal behaviors (i.e., pushing and pulling information) across conditions of human-autonomy teams and human-human teams, and then analyzed their relationship with TSA and team performance via Growth Curve Modelling (GCM). Good teamwork involves anticipating the needs of teammates and that means pushing information before it is requested. Therefore, if things are going well, there should be little need for pulling information. In this study’s task, participants were instructed to push information to others, and over time master the specific timing of information sharing to the intended recipient. Findings indicate that pushing information was positively associated with TSA and team performance, and human-autonomy teams had lower levels of both pushing and pulling information than all-human teams. Through this study, we have learned that anticipation of other team member behaviors and information requirements in human-autonomy teams are important for effective TSA and team performance. In order to make HAT more effective in terms of teamwork, we need to develop mechanisms to enhance pushing information within HAT.

[1]  Jeffrey M. Bradshaw,et al.  Ten Challenges for Making Automation a "Team Player" in Joint Human-Agent Activity , 2004, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[2]  Joshua F. Wiley,et al.  Growth Curve Analysis and Visualization Using R , 2014 .

[3]  Marialena Vagia,et al.  A literature review on the levels of automation during the years. What are the different taxonomies that have been proposed? , 2016, Applied ergonomics.

[4]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Teaming With a Synthetic Teammate: Insights into Human-Autonomy Teaming , 2018, Hum. Factors.

[5]  Hadley Wickham,et al.  ggplot2 - Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis (2nd Edition) , 2017 .

[6]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Interactive Team Cognition , 2013, Cogn. Sci..

[7]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  The synthetic teammate project , 2009, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[8]  A. Cillessen,et al.  Developmental trajectories of adolescent popularity: a growth curve modelling analysis. , 2006, Journal of adolescence.

[9]  Michelle M. Robertson,et al.  Situation awareness in aircraft maintenance teams , 2000 .

[10]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Team cognition in experienced command-and-control teams. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[11]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Team communication behaviors of the human-automation teaming , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support (CogSIMA).

[12]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Measuring Team Knowledge , 2000, Hum. Factors.

[13]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Design and Evaluation for Situation Awareness Enhancement , 1988 .

[14]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Changes in Team Composition after a Break: Building Adapative Command-and-Control Teams , 2006 .

[15]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  The Synthetic Teammate as a Team Player in Command-and-Control Teams , 2016 .

[16]  Patrick J Curran,et al.  Twelve Frequently Asked Questions About Growth Curve Modeling , 2010, Journal of cognition and development : official journal of the Cognitive Development Society.

[17]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Synthetic Teammate Communication and Coordination With Humans , 2015 .

[18]  Roel Bosker,et al.  Multilevel analysis : an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling , 1999 .

[19]  John R. Anderson How Can the Human Mind Occur in the Physical Universe , 2007 .

[20]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Team coordination dynamics. , 2010, Nonlinear dynamics, psychology, and life sciences.

[21]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Measuring team situation awareness in decentralized command and control environments , 2006, Ergonomics.

[22]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Interaction-Based Measures of Cognitive Systems , 2009 .

[23]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Designing a Synthetic Task Environment , 2017 .

[24]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Communication as Team-level Cognitive Processing , 2017 .

[25]  Axel Schulte,et al.  Design Patterns for Human-Cognitive Agent Teaming , 2016, HCI.

[26]  F.E. Cellier,et al.  High-autonomy control of space resource processing plants , 1993, IEEE Control Systems.

[27]  Nancy J. Cooke,et al.  Human Teaming Changes Driven by Expectations of a Synthetic Teammate , 2014 .