Evaluating shifts in Japan's quality-of-life

This paper presents a Data Envelopment Analysis/Malmquist index (DEA/MI) analysis of the change in quality-of-life (QOL), which is defined as the state of a social system as measured by multiple social-indicators. Applying panel data from Japan's 47 prefectures for the period 1975-2002, we identify significant movement in the country's overall QOL using a "cumulative" frontier shift index. Results suggest that Japan's QOL rose during the so-called "bubble economy years" (second half of the 1980s), and then dropped in the succeeding "lost-decade" (1990s). We also identify those prefectures considered most "responsible" for the shift(s) in QOL. Moreover, the use of both upper- and lower-bound DEAs enabled an evaluation of both "good" and "bad" movements in QOL.

[1]  Tomomi Matsui,et al.  AN INEFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT METHOD FOR MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS , 1994 .

[2]  Ali Emrouznejad,et al.  Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years , 2008 .

[3]  W. Cooper,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 1999 .

[4]  A. Hashimoto,et al.  Measuring the change in R&D efficiency of the Japanese pharmaceutical industry , 2008 .

[5]  Akihiro Hashimoto,et al.  Has Livability of Japan Gotten Better for 1956–1990?: a Dea Approach , 1997 .

[6]  Noelia Somarriba,et al.  Synthetic Indicators of Quality of Life in Europe , 2009 .

[7]  Joe Zhu,et al.  Multidimensional quality-of-life measure with an application to Fortune’s best cities , 2001 .

[8]  篠原 正明,et al.  William W.Cooper,Lawrence M.Seiford,Kaoru Tone 著, DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS : A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000年, 318頁 , 2002 .

[9]  S. Malmquist.  Index numbers and indifference surfaces , 1953 .

[10]  P. Murias,et al.  A Composite Indicator for University Quality Assesment: The Case of Spanish Higher Education System , 2008 .

[11]  P. Andersen,et al.  A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[12]  P. Murias,et al.  An Economic Wellbeing Index for the Spanish Provinces: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach , 2006 .

[13]  A. Hashimoto.  A DEA SELECTION SYSTEM FOR SELECTIVE EXAMINATIONS , 1996 .

[14]  A. U.S.,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 2003 .

[15]  A. Hashimoto.  A ranked voting system using a DEA/AR exclusion model: A note , 1997 .

[16]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[17]  Wade D. Cook,et al.  Upper and Lower Bound Evaluation of Multiattribute Objects: Comparison Models Using Linear Programming , 1995 .

[18]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Introduction to the Theory and Application of Data Envelopment Analysis: A Foundation Text with Integrated Software , 2001 .

[19]  R. Färe,et al.  Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries , 1994 .

[20]  A. Hashimoto,et al.  Using DEA to evaluate the state of society as measured by multiple social indicators , 1993 .

[21]  Arnold Reisman,et al.  Absolutely Positively Operations Research: 50 Years of Contributions by William Wager Cooper , 2002 .

[22]  R. Miller,et al.  Measuring Social Well-Being: A Progress Report on the Development of Social Indicators. , 1979 .