Oblique Frictional Impact of a Bar: Analysis and Comparison of Different Impact Laws

In this paper a basic, easily to multi-contact problems extendable, non-smooth approach is applied to analyze a bar striking an inelastic half-space. Coulomb contact is assumed and modeled by using set-valued Newtonian impact laws in normal as well as in tangential direction. The resulting linear complementarity problem contains all possible impact states and provides an instantaneous collision operator that respects all inequality constraints. This operator depends on the orientation of the bar and determines uniquely the post-impact velocities as functions of the pre-impact state. Different types of solutions may occur, including “stick’’ and “slip’’. In this context, stick and slip have to be understood as the two cases characterized by the tangential impulsive force as an element of either the set-valued or of the single-valued domain of the friction law. Depending on the choice of parameters, sign reversal of the tangential contact velocity is possible. For certain inertia properties and initial conditions, the collision operator yields an impact, even for initially vanishing normal contact velocity. This phenomenon is well known as the Painlevé paradox. The results obtained by this fully non-smooth rigid body approach are compared with those of other impact models, such as a lumped mass model with compliance elements, and a collision operator used for particle interactions in flows.

[1]  Michel Y. Louge,et al.  Measurements of the collision properties of small spheres , 1994 .

[2]  C. Glocker,et al.  Formulation and Preparation for Numerical Evaluation of Linear Complementarity Systems in Dynamics , 2005 .

[3]  Katta G. Murty,et al.  Linear complementarity, linear and nonlinear programming , 1988 .

[4]  B. Brogliato,et al.  New results on Painlevé paradoxes , 1999 .

[5]  Bahram Ravani,et al.  Oblique impact with friction and tangential compliance , 2001, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[6]  É. Delassus Sur les lois du frottement de glissement , 1923 .

[7]  G. Stavroulakis Multibody Dynamics with Unilateral Contacts by Friedrich Pfeiffer and Christoph Glocker, Wiley, New York, 1996 , 1998 .

[8]  Richard W. Cottle,et al.  Linear Complementarity Problem. , 1992 .

[9]  J. Moreau,et al.  Unilateral Contact and Dry Friction in Finite Freedom Dynamics , 1988 .

[10]  Yu Wang,et al.  Modeling impact dynamics for robotic operations , 1987, Proceedings. 1987 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[11]  R. Luciano,et al.  Stress-penalty method for unilateral contact problems: mathematical formulation and computational aspects , 1994 .

[12]  Friedrich Pfeiffer,et al.  Multibody Dynamics with Unilateral Contacts , 1996 .

[13]  Henk Nijmeijer,et al.  Periodic motion and bifurcations induced by the Painlevé paradox , 2002 .

[14]  B. Brogliato Nonsmooth Impact Mechanics: Models, Dynamics and Control , 1996 .