Kinematic analysis and design considerations for optimal base frame arrangement of humanoid shoulders

It is well known that kinematics can significantly affect the manipulation capabilities of robotic arms, traditionally illustrated by performance indices such as workspace volume, kinematic and force manipulability, and isotropy within the arm workspace. In the case of dual-arm systems and bimanual manipulation tasks, the kinematics effects to the above indices becomes even more apparent. However, in spite of the large number of dual-arm systems developed in the past, there is a little literature on the kinematic design analysis for the development of such systems. Particularly, the effects of configuration/ orientation of the shoulders' placement with respect to the torso structure have not sufficiently studied or considered, while many dual-arm systems with upward and/or forward tilt angle in shoulder base frame have been introduced. This paper addresses this problem and quantifies the effect of shoulders base frame orientation in a dual-arm manipulation system by looking at its effect on several important manipulation indices, such as the overall and common workspace, redundancy, global isotropy, dual-arm manipulability, and inertia ellipsoid index within the common workspace of the two arms. Consequently, a range of upward and forward tilt angles for the shoulder frames is identified for the design of a dual-arm torso system to render the most desired manipulation performance.

[1]  Chanhun Park,et al.  Dual arm robot for packaging and assembling of IT products , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering (CASE).

[2]  Bruce Fardanesh,et al.  Manipulation workspace analysis using the Monte Carlo Method , 1990 .

[3]  Tsuneo Yoshikawa,et al.  Analysis and Control of Robot Manipulators with Redundancy , 1983 .

[4]  Norman I. Badler,et al.  Real-Time Inverse Kinematics of the Human Arm , 1996, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[5]  H. Harry Asada,et al.  Dynamic analysis and design of robot manipulators using inertia ellipsoids , 1984, ICRA.

[6]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  Upper-body impedance control with variable stiffness for a door opening task , 2014, 2014 IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[7]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  iCub: the design and realization of an open humanoid platform for cognitive and neuroscience research , 2007, Adv. Robotics.

[8]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  COMpliant huMANoid COMAN: Optimal joint stiffness tuning for modal frequency control , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[9]  Christoph Borst,et al.  A Humanoid Two-Arm System for Dexterous Manipulation , 2006, 2006 6th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[10]  Nikolaos G. Tsagarakis,et al.  A manipulation framework for compliant humanoid COMAN: Application to a valve turning task , 2014, 2014 IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots.

[11]  Kazuhito Yokoi,et al.  Development of a software for motion optimization of robots - Application to the kick motion of the HRP-2 robot , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics.

[12]  J. C. Samin,et al.  ROBOTRAN: Symbolic Generation of Multi-Body System Dynamic Equations , 1993 .

[13]  Erico Guizzo,et al.  Robotics Trends for 2012 [The Future Is Robots] , 2012, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[14]  Septimiu E. Salcudean,et al.  Fast constrained global minimax optimization of robot parameters , 1998, Robotica.

[15]  Charles A. Klein,et al.  Dexterity Measures for the Design and Control of Kinematically Redundant Manipulators , 1987 .

[16]  Danica Kragic,et al.  Dual arm manipulation - A survey , 2012, Robotics Auton. Syst..

[17]  Karsten Berns,et al.  The Humanoid Robot ARMAR: Design and Control , 2000 .

[18]  Sukhan Lee,et al.  Dual redundant arm configuration optimization with task-oriented dual arm manipulability , 1989, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..