A Real-time PPG Quality Assessment Approach for Healthcare Internet-of-Things

Abstract Photoplethysmography (PPG) as a non-invasive and low-cost technique plays a significant role in wearable Internet-of-Things based health monitoring systems, enabling continuous health and well-being data collection. As PPG monitoring is relatively simple, non-invasive, and convenient, it is widely used in a variety of wearable devices (e.g., smart bands, smart rings, smartphones) to acquire different vital signs such as heart rate and pulse rate variability. However, the accuracy of such vital signs highly depends on the quality of the signal and the presence of artifacts generated by other resources such as motion. This unreliable performance is unacceptable in health monitoring systems. To tackle this issue, different studies have proposed motion artifacts reduction and signal quality assessment methods. However, they merely focus on improvements in the results and signal quality. Therefore, they are unable to alleviate erroneous decision making due to invalid vital signs extracted from the unreliable PPG signals. In this paper, we propose a novel PPG quality assessment approach for IoT-based health monitoring systems, by which the reliability of the vital signs extracted from PPG quality is determined. Therefore, unreliable data can be discarded to prevent inaccurate decision making and false alarms. Exploiting a Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) approach, a hypothesis function is created by comparing heart rate in the PPG with corresponding heart rate values extracted from ECG signal. We implement a proof-of-concept IoT-based system to evaluate the accuracy of the proposed approach.

[1]  Nikolaos G. Bourbakis,et al.  A Survey on Wearable Sensor-Based Systems for Health Monitoring and Prognosis , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[2]  John Allen Photoplethysmography and its application in clinical physiological measurement , 2007, Physiological measurement.

[3]  K. Ashoka Reddy,et al.  Use of Fourier Series Analysis for Motion Artifact Reduction and Data Compression of Photoplethysmographic Signals , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[4]  Q Li,et al.  Dynamic time warping and machine learning for signal quality assessment of pulsatile signals , 2012, Physiological measurement.

[5]  C. Sidney Burrus,et al.  Generalized digital Butterworth filter design , 1998, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[6]  Tapas Mondal,et al.  Wearable Sensors for Remote Health Monitoring , 2017, Sensors.

[7]  Farrokh Marvasti,et al.  Heart Rate Tracking using Wrist-Type Photoplethysmographic (PPG) Signals during Physical Exercise with Simultaneous Accelerometry , 2015, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[8]  B. Natarajan,et al.  Onboard Tagging for Real-Time Quality Assessment of Photoplethysmograms Acquired by a Wireless Reflectance Pulse Oximeter , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems.

[9]  Claudio Narduzzi,et al.  Measuring Heart Rate During Physical Exercise by Subspace Decomposition and Kalman Smoothing , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[10]  Danilo De Donno,et al.  An IoT-Aware Architecture for Smart Healthcare Systems , 2015, IEEE Internet of Things Journal.

[11]  Ronald M. Aarts,et al.  Reduction of Periodic Motion Artifacts in Photoplethysmography , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[12]  S. Salanterä,et al.  The Internet of Things for basic nursing care-A scoping review. , 2017, International journal of nursing studies.

[13]  Mirza Mansoor Baig,et al.  Smart Health Monitoring Systems: An Overview of Design and Modeling , 2013, Journal of Medical Systems.

[14]  Giuseppe Baselli,et al.  A review of methods for the signal quality assessment to improve reliability of heart rate and blood pressures derived parameters , 2016, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[15]  Hangsik Shin,et al.  Photoplethysmography sampling frequency: pilot assessment of how low can we go to analyze pulse rate variability with reliability? , 2017, Physiological measurement.

[16]  N H Lovell,et al.  Signal quality measures for pulse oximetry through waveform morphology analysis , 2011, Physiological measurement.

[17]  E. Hari Krishna,et al.  A Novel Approach for Motion Artifact Reduction in PPG Signals Based on AS-LMS Adaptive Filter , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[18]  Tapio Pahikkala,et al.  Missing data resilient decision-making for healthcare IoT through personalization: A case study on maternal health , 2019, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[19]  Mohamed Elgendi,et al.  Optimal Signal Quality Index for Photoplethysmogram Signals , 2016, Bioengineering.

[20]  Sayeed Shafayet Chowdhury,et al.  Real-Time Robust Heart Rate Estimation From Wrist-Type PPG Signals Using Multiple Reference Adaptive Noise Cancellation , 2018, IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics.

[21]  Virginia Pensabene,et al.  Assessment of the Fitbit Charge 2 for monitoring heart rate , 2018, PloS one.

[22]  Md. Kamrul Hasan,et al.  PREHEAT: Precision heart rate monitoring from intense motion artifact corrupted PPG signals using constrained RLS and wavelets , 2017, Biomed. Signal Process. Control..

[23]  Jimmy Ba,et al.  Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization , 2014, ICLR.

[24]  Shyamal Patel,et al.  A review of wearable sensors and systems with application in rehabilitation , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.