Limits to policy-led innovation and industry development in US biofuels

ABSTRACT Renewable energy industries that replace fossil fuels with biomass-based alternatives are at the forefront of a shift to and an advanced bioeconomy. In the United States, government policies promote second-generation liquid biofuels that use non-food feedstocks like switchgrass to foster industry development. Although government policies and related industry activity created a market niche for switchgrass biofuels, geographic, technical, and institutional barriers limit industry development and regional branching. Policy alone has not been enough to disrupt an industry path dominated by corn-based production. Formation of a switchgrass-based biofuel industry depends on stabilisation of production around a series of inter-related process innovations. Unlike corn-based biofuels, switchgrass and other cellulosic biofuels have no single existing related industry value chain to use to resolve coordination problems. The experience with switchgrass sheds light on the innovation process in general by drawing attention to the early stage of science and technology development.

[1]  M. Lessnoff Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1979 .

[2]  S. Bagchi‐Sen,et al.  A Study of R&D, Collaboration, and Location Preferences of Health and Agricultural Biotech Firms , 2011 .

[3]  Marty R. Schmer,et al.  Crop Management of Switchgrass , 2012 .

[4]  Ron Boschma,et al.  How Do Regions Diversify over Time? Industry Relatedness and the Development of New Growth Paths in Regions , 2011 .

[5]  Bente Halkier,et al.  Methodological Practicalities in Analytical Generalization , 2011 .

[6]  F. Geels,et al.  Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways , 2007 .

[7]  Bradford L. Barham,et al.  UNIVERSITIES AND AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY PATENT PRODUCTION , 2000 .

[8]  Bryan Bals,et al.  Biochemical and thermochemical conversion of switchgrass to biofuels , 2012 .

[9]  Vaclav Smil,et al.  Energy Transitions: History, Requirements, Prospects , 2010 .

[10]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  System innovation through stepwise reconfiguration: the case of technological transitions in Dutch greenhouse horticulture (1930–1980) , 2011, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[11]  R. Perrin,et al.  Net energy of cellulosic ethanol from switchgrass , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[12]  R. Dixon,et al.  Genetic manipulation of lignin reduces recalcitrance and improves ethanol production from switchgrass , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  M. Tushman,et al.  Technological Discontinuities and Dominant Designs: A Cyclical Model of Technological Change , 1990 .

[14]  Sharmistha Bagchi-Sen,et al.  Strategies and External Relationships of Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in the US Agricultural Biotechnology Sector , 2007 .

[15]  F. Geels Processes and patterns in transitions and system innovations: Refining the co-evolutionary multi-level perspective , 2005 .

[16]  Rina Singh The National Bioeconomy Blueprint: Meeting Grand Challenges , 2012 .

[17]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy , 2008, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[18]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Towards a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions , 2012 .

[19]  James Simmie,et al.  Path Dependence and New Path Creation in Renewable Energy Technologies , 2012 .

[20]  J. Bouton Molecular breeding of switchgrass for use as a biofuel crop. , 2007, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[21]  Koen Frenken,et al.  Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Technological Breakthroughs: An analysis of US State-Level Patenting , 2015 .

[22]  Rikard Eriksson,et al.  How does labour mobility affect the performance of plants? The importance of relatedness and geographical proximity , 2008 .

[23]  Ron Boschma,et al.  Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography # 05 . 04 The spatial evolution of the British automobile industry , 2005 .

[24]  P. Kedron Environmental Governance and Shifts in Canadian Biofuel Production and Innovation , 2015 .

[25]  L. A. Kszos,et al.  Development of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) as a bioenergy feedstock in the United States. , 2005 .

[26]  A. Monti,et al.  The Evolution of Switchgrass as an Energy Crop , 2012 .

[27]  K. P. Vogela,et al.  Comparison of corn and switchgrass on marginal soils for bioenergy , 2007 .

[28]  J. Essletzbichler Renewable Energy Technology and Path Creation: A Multi-scalar Approach to Energy Transition in the UK , 2012 .

[29]  Kirby Calvert,et al.  Spatial Analysis of Biomass Resources within a Socio-Ecologically Heterogeneous Region: Identifying Opportunities for a Mixed Feedstock Stream , 2014, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[30]  S. Ponte The Evolutionary Dynamics of Biofuel Value Chains: From Unipolar and Government-Driven to Multipolar Governance , 2014 .

[31]  Francis M. Epplin,et al.  Estimating Region Specific Costs to Produce and Deliver Switchgrass , 2012 .

[32]  Ron Boschma,et al.  Some Notes on Institutions in Evolutionary Economic Geography , 2009 .

[33]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  rKnowledge: The Spatial Diffusion and Adoption of rDNA Methods , 2015 .

[34]  Jürgen Essletzbichler,et al.  Relatedness, Industrial Branching and Technological Cohesion in US Metropolitan Areas , 2013 .

[35]  B. Carlsson,et al.  On the nature, function and composition of technological systems , 1991 .

[36]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  The politics and policy of energy system transformation—explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology , 2006 .

[37]  Robert Bailis,et al.  Constructing Sustainable Biofuels: Governance of the Emerging Biofuel Economy , 2011 .

[38]  K. Frenken,et al.  Related Variety, Unrelated Variety and Regional Economic Growth , 2007 .

[39]  PopescuIoana Industrial Biotechnology in the European Union: Identifying the Best Pathways to Boost Growth of the Bioeconomy , 2014 .

[40]  James M. Utterback,et al.  Dominant Designs and the Survival of Firms , 1995 .

[41]  S. Klepper Entry, Exit, Growth, and Innovation over the Product Life Cycle , 1996 .

[42]  K. Pavitt Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change : Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory : Research Policy , 1984 .

[43]  J. Patchell,et al.  Environmental and evolutionary economic geography: time for eeg2? , 2013 .

[44]  Daniel A. Levinthal The Slow Pace of Rapid Technological Change: Gradualism and Punctuation in Technological Change , 1998 .

[45]  S. Bagchi‐Sen,et al.  A Study of the Emerging Renewable Energy Sector Within Iowa , 2011 .

[46]  Clayton M. Christensen The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail , 2013 .

[47]  J. Schot,et al.  Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation : the approach of strategic niche management , 1998 .

[48]  M. Hekkert,et al.  Functions of innovation systems as a framework to understand sustainable technological change: empirical evidence for earlier claims , 2009 .

[49]  K. McCormick,et al.  Strategies and Policies for the Bioeconomy and Bio-Based Economy: An Analysis of Official National Approaches , 2013 .

[50]  R. Boschma,et al.  A theoretical framework for evolutionary economic geography: industrial dynamics and urban growth as a branching process , 2007 .

[51]  Staffan Jacobsson,et al.  Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis , 2008 .

[52]  Ron Boschma,et al.  The emerging empirics of evolutionary economic geography , 2011 .

[53]  Peter North,et al.  Oil , 2014, The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Imperialism and Anti-Imperialism.

[54]  Francesco Quatraro,et al.  Knowledge Coherence, Variety and economic Growth: Manufacturing Evidence from Italian Regions , 2010 .

[55]  Frank Neffke,et al.  Skill-relatedness and firm diversification , 2013 .

[56]  R. Gross,et al.  UK innovation systems for new and renewable energy technologies: drivers, barriers and systems failures , 2005 .

[57]  Dragos Simandan,et al.  A polymorphic approach to policy analysis: a case study of ontario's ethanol in gasoline regulation , 2015 .