EFFECTS OF SUPPORT STRUCTURE CHANGES ON FLOW-INDUCED VIBRATION CHARACTERISTICS OF STEAM GENERATOR TUBES

Fluid-elastic instability and turbulence-induced vibration of steam generator U-tubes of a nuclear power plant are studied numerically to investigate the effect of design changes of support structures in the upper region of the tubes. Two steam generator models, Model A and Model B, are considered in this study. The main design features of both models are identical except for the conditions of vertical and horizontal support bars. The location and number of vertical and horizontal support bars at the middle of the U-bend region in Model A differs from that of Model B. The stability ratio and the amplitude of turbulence-induced vibration are calculated by a computer program based on the ASME code. The mode shape with a large modal displacement at the upper region of the U-tube is the key parameter related to the fretting wear between the tube and its support structures, such as vertical, horizontal, and diagonal support bars. Therefore, the location and the number of vertical and horizontal support bars have a great influence on the fretting wear mechanism. The variation in the stability ratios for each vibrational mode is compared with respect to Model A and Model B. Even though both models satisfy the design criteria, Model A shows substantial improvements over Model B, particularly in terms of having greater amplitude margins in the turbulence-excited vibration (especially at the inner region of the tube bundle) and better stability ratios for the fluid-elastic instability.

[1]  M. K. Au-Yang.  Turbulent Buffeting of a Multispan Tube Bundle , 1986 .

[2]  M. J. Pettigrew,et al.  Fretting Wear Damage of Heat Exchanger Tubes: A Proposed Damage Criterion Based on Tube Vibration Response , 1998 .

[3]  M. K. Au-Yang.  Joint and Cross Acceptances for Cross-Flow-Induced Vibration—Part II: Charts and Applications , 2000 .

[4]  Michael L. Smith,et al.  SIPPING TEST: CHECKING FOR FAILURE OF FUEL ELEMENTS AT THE OPAL REACTOR , 2010 .

[5]  I. G. Currie,et al.  Vibration of Tube Bundles in Two-Phase Cross-Flow: Part 3—Turbulence-Induced Excitation , 1989 .

[6]  Shoei-Sheng Chen,et al.  Guidelines for the instability flow velocity of tube arrays in crossflow , 1984 .

[7]  H. J. Connors.  Flow-Induced Vibration and Wear of Steam Generator Tubes , 1981 .

[8]  C. E. Taylor,et al.  Vibration analysis of shell-and-tube heat exchangers: an overview—Part 2: vibration response, fretting-wear, guidelines , 2003 .

[9]  M. J. Pettigrew,et al.  Vibration of Tube Bundles in Two-Phase Cross-Flow: Part 1—Hydrodynamic Mass and Damping , 1989 .

[10]  Jong Chull Jo,et al.  Fluidelastic instability analysis of operating nuclear steam generator U-tubes , 1999 .

[11]  M. J. Pettigrew,et al.  Vibration of Tube Bundles in Two-Phase Cross-Flow: Part 2—Fluid-Elastic Instability , 1989 .

[12]  Mk Au-Yang,et al.  Flow-Induced Vibration of Power and Process Plant Components: A Practical Workbook , 2001 .

[13]  Wondea Jung,et al.  INVESTIGATING THE APPROPRIATENESS OF THE TACOM MEASURE – APPLICATION TO THE COMPLEXITY OF PROCEDURALIZED TASKS FOR HIGH SPEED TRAIN DRIVERS , 2010 .

[14]  M. J. Pettigrew,et al.  Flow-induced vibration and related technologies in nuclear components , 1991 .

[15]  S. S. Chen,et al.  Design guide for calculating hydrodynamic mass. Part I. Circular cylindrical structures , 1976 .

[16]  M. J. Pettigrew,et al.  Vibration analysis of shell-and-tube heat exchangers: an overview—Part 1: flow, damping, fluidelastic instability , 2003 .

[17]  Heung June Chung,et al.  FLUID-ELASTIC INSTABILITY OF ROTATED SQUARE TUBE ARRAY IN AN AIR-WATER TWO-PHASE CROSSFLOW , 2006 .

[18]  Ki-Wahn Ryu,et al.  Development and application of an efficient method for performing modal analysis of steam generator tubes in nuclear power plants , 2010 .