Emerging Applications of Face Biometrics and Its Deception

Biometrics has nowadays been of universal interest and has been developed and used for many purposes such as for the detection of criminals and undesirables, identification and access control. Faces are of essential importance for human social life. They provide valuable information about the identity, expression, gaze, health, and age of a person. Many security systems depend upon face recognizers to identify a person. Many of these systems are passive and are deployed at places such as airline terminals. However, face recognizers are sensitive to deception attacks. Previous studies suggest that hair regions are very crucial in face recognition and the success of a recognizer depends on the success of a pre-segmentation stage which extracts the face region from the hair and the background. Deception attacks which would change the hairstyle, apply make-up or occluding objects to the face would cause many systems to fail. The face is equipped to lie the most and leak the most, and thus can be a very confusing source of information during deception. A person can get away with and best perpetrate deception through his face. This paper presents in brief about the deception that can be identified in face and emerging applications of Face recognition technologies.

[1]  C. Darwin,et al.  The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals , 1956 .

[2]  Dale G. Leathers,et al.  Nonverbal indicators of deception: A new theoretical perspective , 1980 .

[3]  Human lie detection ability as a function of the liar's motivation. , 1989 .

[4]  M. Studdert-Kennedy Hand and Mind: What Gestures Reveal About Thought. , 1994 .

[5]  B. Depaulo,et al.  Telling lies. , 1979, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  Gerald R. Miller,et al.  Deception and arousal: Isolating the behavioral correlates of deception. , 1985 .

[7]  Children and the truth. , 1992 .

[8]  R. Johansson,et al.  Hand Movements , 2001 .

[9]  M. Zuckerman Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception , 1981 .

[10]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  Interpersonal deception: III. Effects of deceit on perceived communication and nonverbal behavior dynamics , 1994 .

[11]  C. Darwin The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals , .

[12]  Klaus R. Scherer,et al.  Invited article: Face, voice, and body in detecting deceit , 1991 .

[13]  P. Ekman Emotions revealed , 2004, BMJ.

[14]  James J. Lindsay,et al.  Cues to deception. , 2003, Psychological bulletin.

[15]  B. Depaulo,et al.  Lying in everyday life. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  Lying Words: Predicting Deception from Linguistic Styles , 2003, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[17]  Paul Ekman,et al.  Lies that fail. , 1993 .

[18]  P. Ekman,et al.  Smiles when lying. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  Timothy R. Levine,et al.  How people really detect lies , 2002 .

[20]  Aldert Vrij,et al.  Behavioral Correlates of Deception in a Simulated Police Interview , 1995 .

[21]  R Steinbrook,et al.  The polygraph test--a flawed diagnostic method. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  M. Knapp,et al.  Telling It Like It Isn't: A Review of Theory and Research on Deceptive Communications. , 1979 .