Environmental assessment of CCHP (combined cooling heating and power) systems based on biomass combustion in comparison to conventional generation

Biomass CCHP (combined cooling heating and power) systems based on biomass combustion have already demonstrated their benefits in some operating conditions. However, their environmental and energy performance might not always be better than that of conventional stand-alone generation systems. In order to assess the possible benefits, these plants are evaluated by means of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology to provide some guidelines regarding their environmental feasibility. A thermodynamic model, which considers the integration of different sizes of cogeneration and cooling units, was developed to contribute to properly defining the life cycle inventory stage. Moreover, the model outputs were used to develop a primary energy savings ratio (PESR) analysis and compare its results with those of the LCA.

[1]  Roberto Dones,et al.  Life Cycle Inventories of Energy Systems: Results for Current Systems in Switzerland and other UCTE Countries , 2007 .

[2]  A. Baky,et al.  Biomass from agriculture in small-scale combined heat and power plants : A comparative life cycle assessment , 2011 .

[3]  Abdul Khaliq,et al.  Exergy analysis of gas turbine trigeneration system for combined production of power heat and refrigeration , 2009 .

[4]  H. Mckay,et al.  Environmental, economic, social and political drivers for increasing use of woodfuel as a renewable resource in Britain. , 2006 .

[5]  Fernando Sebastián,et al.  Assessment of CCHP systems based on biomass combustion for small-scale applications through a review of the technology and analysis of energy efficiency parameters , 2013 .

[6]  Antonio Piacentino,et al.  Cogeneration: a regulatory framework toward growth , 2005 .

[7]  Saffa Riffat,et al.  Experimental investigation of a biomass-fuelled micro-scale tri-generation system with an organic Rankine cycle and liquid desiccant cooling unit , 2014 .

[8]  Rita Puig,et al.  Review of micro- and small-scale technologies to produce electricity and heat from Mediterranean forests׳ wood chips , 2015 .

[9]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[10]  María Uris,et al.  Techno-economic feasibility assessment of a biomass cogeneration plant based on an Organic Rankine Cycle. , 2014 .

[11]  Gerald Rebitzer,et al.  IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology , 2003 .

[12]  Pierluigi Mancarella,et al.  Distributed multi-generation: A comprehensive view , 2009 .

[13]  Pierluigi Mancarella,et al.  Multi-energy systems : An overview of concepts and evaluation models , 2015 .

[14]  You-Yin Jing,et al.  Multi-objective optimization design and operation strategy analysis of BCHP system based on life cycle assessment , 2012 .

[15]  Pierluigi Mancarella,et al.  Trigeneration Primary Energy Saving Evaluation for Energy Planning and Policy Development , 2007 .

[16]  Martin Pehnt,et al.  Dynamic life cycle assessment (LCA) of renewable energy technologies , 2006 .

[17]  Ingwald Obernberger,et al.  STATE-OF-THE-ART AND FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS REGARDING SMALL-SCALE BIOMASS CHP SYSTEMS WITH A SPECIAL FOCUS ON ORC AND STIRLING ENGINE TECHNOLOGIES , 2003 .

[18]  Pedro J. Mago,et al.  Combined cooling, heating and power: A review of performance improvement and optimization , 2014 .

[19]  Sergio Ulgiati,et al.  Assessing the environmental performance and sustainability of bioenergy production in Sweden: A life cycle assessment perspective , 2012 .

[20]  Saffa Riffat,et al.  Tri-generation systems: Energy policies, prime movers, cooling technologies, configurations and operation strategies , 2014 .

[21]  M. Giugliano,et al.  LCA of domestic and centralized biomass combustion: The case of Lombardy (Italy). , 2010 .

[22]  Chao Fu,et al.  Design optimization and analysis of a biomass gasification based BCHP system: A case study in Harbin, China , 2014 .

[23]  Luis M. Serra,et al.  Optimal synthesis of trigeneration systems subject to environmental constraints , 2011 .

[24]  Gerald Rebitzer,et al.  The ecoinvent database system: a comprehensive web-based LCA database , 2005 .

[25]  Pierluigi Mancarella,et al.  A unified model for energy and environmental performance assessment of natural gas-fueled poly-generation systems , 2008 .

[26]  Fahad A. Al-Sulaiman,et al.  Greenhouse gas emission and exergy assessments of an integrated organic Rankine cycle with a biomass combustor for combined cooling, heating and power production , 2011 .

[27]  Ruzhu Wang,et al.  COMBINED COOLING, HEATING AND POWER: A REVIEW , 2006 .

[28]  Francis Meunier,et al.  Environmental assessment of biogas co- or tri-generation units by life cycle analysis methodology , 2005 .

[29]  You-Yin Jing,et al.  Life cycle assessment of a solar combined cooling heating and power system in different operation strategies , 2012 .

[30]  Carlo Roselli,et al.  Distributed microtrigeneration systems , 2012 .

[31]  Iain Staffell,et al.  Life cycle assessment of an alkaline fuel cell CHP system , 2010 .

[32]  Yi Jiang,et al.  Energy utilization evaluation of CCHP systems , 2006 .

[33]  Martin Pehnt,et al.  Environmental impacts of distributed energy systems—The case of micro cogeneration , 2008 .

[34]  Joel Hernández-Santoyo,et al.  Trigeneration: an alternative for energy savings , 2003 .

[35]  Antonio Piacentino,et al.  A methodology for sizing a trigeneration plant in mediterranean areas , 2003 .