Health information: does quality count for the consumer?

An aspect of the information literacy of health information consumers is explored, in particular whether and how they evaluate the quality of health information on the Internet and in printed formats. A total of 32 members of patient support groups in North-East Scotland were recruited to take part in information review groups (a variation of focus group methodology) where discussion focused on a set of health information materials. Data analysis revealed 15 ways in which the participants evaluated quality. The two most important indicators of quality were organizational authority and the use of plain language. They did not find many of the indicators of evidence-based information. Participants demonstrated lack of confidence about their ability to select quality health information and relied on preselection by authoritative sources (libraries, support groups, health professionals) and distrusted the Internet.

[1]  Sue Welsh,et al.  Finding and Using Health and Medical Information on the Internet , 2000 .

[2]  J W Feightner,et al.  Preventive health information on the Internet. Qualitative study of consumers' perspectives. , 2001, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien.

[3]  J. Pennbridge,et al.  Questionnaire survey of California consumers' use and rating of sources of health care information including the Internet. , 1999, The Western journal of medicine.

[4]  C Estabrooks,et al.  Decision aids: are they worth it? A systematic review , 2001, Journal of health services research & policy.

[5]  Christian Köhler,et al.  How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  J. Powell,et al.  Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: a systematic review. , 2002, JAMA.

[7]  David Nicholas,et al.  Innovations online: 2 , 2002 .

[8]  V. Entwistle,et al.  Disseminating information about healthcare effectiveness: a survey of consumer health information services. , 1998, Quality in health care : QHC.

[9]  Angela Coulter,et al.  Paternalism or partnership? , 1999, BMJ.

[10]  H. Russell-Johnson.  Paternalism to partnership. , 1995, Paediatric nursing.

[11]  R. McKendry,et al.  Evaluation of the quality of patient information to support informed shared decision‐making , 2001, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[12]  Peter Williams,et al.  Surfing for health: user evaluation of a health information website. Part two: fieldwork. , 2002, Health information and libraries journal.

[13]  Jay M Bernhardt,et al.  Online Pediatric Information Seeking Among Mothers of Young Children: Results From a Qualitative Study Using Focus Groups , 2004, Journal of medical Internet research.

[14]  Janet Morahan-Martin,et al.  How Internet Users Find, Evaluate, and Use Online Health Information: A Cross-Cultural Review , 2004, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[15]  Sasha Shepperd,et al.  Learning to DISCERN online: applying an appraisal tool to health websites in a workshop setting. , 2004, Health education research.

[16]  A Coulter,et al.  Sharing decisions with patients: is the information good enough? , 1999, BMJ.

[17]  J C Wyatt,et al.  Commentary: measuring quality and impact of the world wide web , 1997, BMJ.

[18]  Sasha Shepperd,et al.  Against internet exceptionalism , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  Lee Rainie,et al.  The online health care revolution: how the web helps americans take better care of themselves , 2000 .

[20]  Sue Childs,et al.  Developing health website quality assessment guidelines for the voluntary sector: outcomes from the Judge Project. , 2004, Health information and libraries journal.

[21]  W R Hersh,et al.  Applicability and quality of information for answering clinical questions on the Web. , 1998, JAMA.

[22]  S. Oliver,et al.  Searching for high-quality evidence to prepare patient information. , 2001, Health information and libraries journal.

[23]  Kylie A. Williams,et al.  How do Consumers Search for and Appraise Information on Medicines on the Internet? A Qualitative Study Using Focus Groups , 2003, Journal of medical Internet research.

[24]  J. Ward,et al.  How risks of breast cancer and benefits of screening are communicated to women: analysis of 58 pamphlets , 1998, BMJ.

[25]  Ellen R. Tauber,et al.  How Do People Evaluate a Web Site's Credibility? , 2002 .

[26]  D Charnock,et al.  DISCERN: an instrument for judging the quality of written consumer health information on treatment choices. , 1999, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[27]  P. Impicciatore,et al.  Reliability of health information for the public on the world wide web: systematic survey of advice on managing fever in children at home , 1997, BMJ.