The safety value of guardrails and crash cushions: a meta-analysis of evidence from evaluation studies.

Evidence from 32 studies that have evaluated the safety effects of median barriers, guardrails along the edge of the road, and crash cushions (impact attenuators) is summarized by means of a meta-analysis. Two hundred and thirty-two (232) estimates of safety effects are included in the meta-analysis. The presence of publication bias is tested by means of the funnel graph method. For most subsets of the data, no evidence of publication bias is found. Weighted mean estimates of safety effects are computed by means of the logodds method. Median barriers are found to increase accident rate, but reduce accident severity. Guardrails and crash cushions are found to reduce both accident rate and accident severity. The effects of guardrails and crash cushions on accident rate have been less extensively studied than the effects on accident severity. Current estimates of the effects on accident rate are highly uncertain because of methodological shortcomings of available studies. The effects of guardrails on accident severity are found to be quite robust with respect to study design and the number of confounding variables controlled in each study. In general, random variation in the number of accidents is the most important source of variation in study results.

[1]  W E Schaefer,et al.  CALIFORNIA MEDIAN STUDY: 1958 , 1960 .

[2]  Malcolm Good,et al.  A REVIEW OF ROADSIDE OBJECTS IN RELATION TO ROAD SAFETY , 1973 .

[3]  William R. McShane,et al.  A review of pedestrian safety models for urban areas in Low and Middle Income Countries , 2016 .

[4]  Malcolm H. Ray,et al.  Characteristics of Fixed‐Roadside‐Object Side‐Impact Accidents , 1991 .

[5]  John F. Carney.  Effectiveness of Highway Safety Improvements , 1986 .

[6]  John C Glennon,et al.  Evaluation of Minor Improvements , 1968 .

[7]  Joe Lee,et al.  CRASH CUSHION IMPROVEMENT PRIORITY AND PERFORMANCE EVALUATION , 1986 .

[8]  F. J. Tamanini,et al.  Effective highway barriers , 1973 .

[9]  K Perchonok,et al.  Hazardous effects of highway features and roadside objects. Volumes 1 and 2 , 1978 .

[10]  J D Michie,et al.  GUARDRAIL PERFORMANCE AND DESIGN , 1971 .

[11]  C E Billion.  EFFECT OF MEDIAN DIVIDERS ON DRIVER BEHAVIOR , 1956 .

[12]  J E Bryden,et al.  PERFORMANCE OF HIGHWAY TRAFFIC BARRIERS , 1986 .

[13]  B. Everitt,et al.  Statistical methods for rates and proportions , 1973 .

[14]  H D Johnson.  CROSS-OVER ACCIDENTS IN ALL-PURPOSE DUAL CARRIAGEWAYS , 1980 .

[15]  C C Schoon.  AFTER SEVEN YEARS RIMOB IN PRACTICE: AN EVALUATION OF THE DUTCH IMPACT ATTENUATOR RIMOB , 1990 .

[16]  D. L. Woods,et al.  Remedial safety treatment of narrow bridges , 1976 .

[17]  G. Guyatt,et al.  The Science of Reviewing Research a , 1993, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Charles N. Kurucz,et al.  AN ANALYSIS OF THE INJURY REDUCTION CAPABILITIES OF BREAKAWAY LIGHT STANDARDS AND VARIOUS GUARDRAILS , 1984 .

[19]  H Mohlin.  Avkörningsolyckor och vägens sidoutrymme , 1975 .

[20]  A Taragin,et al.  EFFECT OF PARKWAY MEDIANS ON DRIVER BEHAVIOR-WESTCHESTER COUNTY PARKWAYS , 1962 .

[21]  J W Hall.  GUARDRAIL INSTALLATION AND IMPROVEMENT PRIORITIES , 1982 .

[22]  N. C. Parsons,et al.  MEDIAN ACCIDENT STUDY-LONG ISLAND, NEW YORK , 1962 .

[23]  Joseph Galati.  STUDY OF BOX-BEAM MEDIAN BARRIER ACCIDENTS , 1970 .

[24]  Griffin Li.  HOW EFFECTIVE ARE CRASH CUSHIONS IN REDUCING DEATHS AND INJURIES , 1984 .

[25]  John C Glennon,et al.  Objective criteria for guardrail installation , 1967 .

[26]  Mark W. Lipsey,et al.  Evaluation: A Systematic Approach , 1979 .

[27]  Roger T Johnson.  EFFECTIVENESS OF MEDIAN BARRIERS , 1966 .

[28]  R. Rosenthal.  Meta-analytic procedures for social research , 1984 .

[29]  J R Stewart,et al.  Comparative performance study of longitudinal roadside barriers and end treatments , 1994 .

[30]  Ej Tye.  Median barriers in California , 1975 .

[31]  John E. Hunter,et al.  Methods of Meta-Analysis , 1989 .