Signal processing strategies that improve performance and understanding of the quantitative ultrasound SPECTRAL FIT algorithm.

Quantifying the size of the tissue microstructure using the backscattered power spectrum has had limited success due to frequency-dependent attenuation along the propagation path, thus masking the frequency dependence of the scatterer size. Previously, the SPECTRAL FIT algorithm was developed to solve for total attenuation and scatterer size simultaneously [Bigelow et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 117, 1431-1439 (2005)]. Herein, the outcomes from signal processing strategies on the SPECTRAL FIT algorithm are investigated. The signal processing methods can be grouped into two categories, viz., methods that improve the performance of the algorithm and methods that provide insight. The methods that improve the performance include compensating for the windowing function used to gate the time-domain signal, averaging the spectra in the normal frequency domain rather than the log domain to improve the precision of the scatterer size and attenuation estimates, improving the selection of the usable frequency range for the SPECTRAL FIT algorithm, and improving the compensation for electronic noise. The methods that provide insight demonstrate that the anomalous rapid fluctuations of the backscattered power spectrum do not affect the SPECTRAL FIT algorithm, and accurate attenuation estimates can be obtained even when the correct scatterer geometry (i.e., form factor) is not known.

[1]  A.R. Skovoroda,et al.  Tissue elasticity reconstruction based on ultrasonic displacement and strain images , 1995, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[2]  Timothy A Bigelow,et al.  Scatterer size estimation in pulse-echo ultrasound using focused sources: theoretical approximations and simulation analysis. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  S. Alam,et al.  Radiation-force technique to monitor lesions during ultrasonic therapy. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[4]  T. Noritomi,et al.  Carotid plaque typing by multiple-parameter ultrasonic tissue characterization. , 1997, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[5]  Mitsuhiro Ueda,et al.  The effect of windowing on spectral estimation of echoes scattered by a random medium , 1988 .

[6]  William D. O'Brien,et al.  Differentiation and characterization of rat mammary fibroadenomas and 4T1 mouse carcinomas using quantitative ultrasound imaging , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  T. Varghese,et al.  Statistics of ultrasonic scatterer size estimation with a reference phantom. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  E. Feleppa,et al.  Relationship of Ultrasonic Spectral Parameters to Features of Tissue Microstructure , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[9]  J. Ophir,et al.  Elastography: A Quantitative Method for Imaging the Elasticity of Biological Tissues , 1991, Ultrasonic imaging.

[10]  M. O’Donnell,et al.  Theoretical analysis and verification of ultrasound displacement and strain imaging , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[11]  E. Feleppa,et al.  Theoretical framework for spectrum analysis in ultrasonic tissue characterization. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Ronald H. Silverman,et al.  Very-High Frequency Ultrasonic Imaging and Spectral Assays of the Eye , 1997 .

[13]  J A Zagzebski,et al.  Ultrasound backscatter and attenuation in human liver with diffuse disease. , 1999, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[14]  Gregg E. Trahey,et al.  A Finite Element Model of Remote Palpation of Breast Lesions Using Radiation Force: Factors Affecting Tissue Displacement , 2000, Ultrasonic imaging.

[15]  K. Wear Fundamental precision limitations for measurements of frequency dependence of backscatter: applications in tissue-mimicking phantoms and trabecular bone. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  K. Wear,et al.  A Gaussian framework for modeling effects of frequency-dependent attenuation, frequency-dependent scattering, and gating , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[17]  E J Feleppa,et al.  Determination of carotid plaque risk by ultrasonic tissue characterization. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[18]  John G. Proakis,et al.  Digital Signal Processing: Principles, Algorithms, and Applications , 1992 .

[19]  M. O’Donnell,et al.  Internal displacement and strain imaging using ultrasonic speckle tracking , 1994, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[20]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Describing small-scale structure in random media using pulse-echo ultrasound. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  J. G. Miller,et al.  Interlaboratory comparison of ultrasonic backscatter, attenuation, and speed measurements. , 1999, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[22]  Ronald H. Silverman,et al.  Ultrasonic spectrum analysis for tissue assays and therapy evaluation , 1997, Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol..

[23]  Timothy A Bigelow,et al.  Estimation of total attenuation and scatterer size from backscattered ultrasound waveforms. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  Robert Folberg,et al.  Spectral parameter imaging for detection of prognostically significant histologic features in uveal melanoma. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.