Biophysical determinants of transcranial magnetic stimulation: effects of excitability and depth of targeted area.

Safe and effective transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) requires accurate intensity calibration. Output is typically calibrated to individual motor cortex excitability and applied to nonmotor brain areas, assuming that it captures a site nonspecific factor of excitability. We tested this assumption by correlating the effect of TMS at motor and visual cortex. In 30 participants, we measured motor threshold (MT) and phosphene threshold (PT) at the scalp surface and at coil-scalp distances of 3.17, 5.63, and 9.03 mm. We also modeled the effect of TMS in a simple head model to test the effect of distance. Four independent tests confirmed a significant correlation between PT and MT. We also found similar effects of distance in motor and visual areas, which did not correlate across participants. Computational modeling suggests that the relationship between the effect of distance and the induced electric field is effectively linear within the range of distances that have been explored empirically. We conclude that MT-guided calibration is valid for nonmotor brain areas if coil-cortex distance is taken into account. For standard figure-of-eight TMS coils connected to biphasic stimulators, the effect of cortical distance should be adjusted using a general correction factor of 2.7% stimulator output per millimeter.

[1]  Kwang-Hyuk Lee,et al.  Where does transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) stimulate? Modelling of induced field maps for some common cortical and cerebellar targets , 2012, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[2]  Jobi S. George,et al.  Journal of Neuroscience Methods Stimulating Deep Cortical Structures with the Batwing Coil: How to Determine the Intensity for Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Using Coil–cortex Distance , 2022 .

[3]  Mark G. Stokes,et al.  Reliability of the ‘observation of movement’ method for determining motor threshold using transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2011, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[4]  Justin A. Harris,et al.  Accurate and Rapid Estimation of Phosphene Thresholds (REPT) , 2011, PloS one.

[5]  Colin W G Clifford,et al.  Improving Visual Sensitivity with Subthreshold Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  S. S. Ayache,et al.  Comparison of “standard” and “navigated” procedures of TMS coil positioning over motor, premotor and prefrontal targets in patients with chronic pain and depression , 2010, Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.

[7]  A Reichenbach,et al.  The cortical site of visual suppression by transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[8]  S. Rossi,et al.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[9]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  Optimizing Functional Accuracy of TMS in Cognitive Studies: A Comparison of Methods , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  M. Iacoboni,et al.  Correlation between motor and phosphene thresholds: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 2008, Human brain mapping.

[11]  T. Paus,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the challenge of coil placement: A comparison of conventional and stereotaxic neuronavigational strategies , 2008, Human brain mapping.

[12]  Jason B. Mattingley,et al.  Distance-adjusted motor threshold for transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[13]  Tracy R. Henderson,et al.  Simple metric for scaling motor threshold based on scalp-cortex distance: application to studies using transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  T. Kammer,et al.  Electric field properties of two commercial figure-8 coils in TMS: calculation of focality and efficiency , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[15]  Walter Paulus,et al.  No correlation between moving phosphene and motor thresholds: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. , 2004, Neuroreport.

[16]  Uwe Herwig,et al.  Using the International 10-20 EEG System for Positioning of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2004, Brain Topography.

[17]  B. Meyer,et al.  Evaluation of cortical excitability by motor and phosphene thresholds in transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2003, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[18]  Henrik Foltys,et al.  Visual and motor cortex excitability: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[19]  Thomas E Schlaepfer,et al.  Antidepressant effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the elderly: correlation between effect size and coil-cortex distance. , 2002, Archives of general psychiatry.

[20]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Motor and phosphene thresholds: a transcranial magnetic stimulation correlation study , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  Haruo Nagayama,et al.  Lack of association between a polymorphism in the promoter region of the dopamine D2 receptor and personality traits , 2001, Psychiatry Research.

[22]  Cyrill v. Tiesenhausen,et al.  The navigation of transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2001, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[23]  Z. Nahas,et al.  Brain effects of TMS delivered over prefrontal cortex in depressed adults: role of stimulation frequency and coil-cortex distance. , 2001, The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences.

[24]  Jared Rutter,et al.  Regulation of Clock and NPAS2 DNA Binding by the Redox State of NAD Cofactors , 2001, Science.

[25]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Fast Backprojections from the Motion to the Primary Visual Area Necessary for Visual Awareness , 2001, Science.

[26]  J. Lorberbaum,et al.  The transcranial magnetic stimulation motor threshold depends on the distance from coil to underlying cortex: a replication in healthy adults comparing two methods of assessing the distance to cortex , 2001, Biological Psychiatry.

[27]  J. Lorberbaum,et al.  How coil-cortex distance relates to age, motor threshold, and antidepressant response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. , 2000, The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences.

[28]  C. Rorden,et al.  Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. , 2000, Behavioural neurology.

[29]  K. Welch,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation confirms hyperexcitability of occipital cortex in migraine , 1998, Neurology.

[30]  E. Wassermann.  Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996. , 1998, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[31]  K. Mills,et al.  Corticomotor threshold to magnetic stimulation: Normal values and repeatability , 1997, Muscle & nerve.

[32]  P. Rossini,et al.  Non-invasive electrical and magnetic stimulation of the brain, spinal cord and roots: basic principles and procedures for routine clinical application. Report of an IFCN committee. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[33]  M Hallett,et al.  Topographic mapping of the human motor cortex with magnetic stimulation: factors affecting accuracy and reproducibility. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[34]  A. Barker,et al.  NON-INVASIVE MAGNETIC STIMULATION OF HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX , 1985, The Lancet.