House of Project Complexity - Understanding Complexity in Large Infrastructure Projects

This paper describes our conceptualization of complexity in large infrastructure projects. Since complexity itself is an emergent concept that is hard to pin down, we focus on the relationship between various project features and properties associated with complexity such as difficulty, outcome variability and non-linearity, and (non) governability. We propose a combined structural and process-based theoretical framework for understanding contributors to complexity—the ‘House of Project Complexity’ (HoPC). The formulation of the HoPC draws from a rich projects literature and is developed iteratively by first applying it to two trial samples and then to the main data set of 20 detailed case studies of infrastructure projects prepared for the IMEC study. A main contribution of this work is the conceptual distinction in the HoPC between ‘inherent project features’, ‘architectural features’, and their relationship with project outcomes and emergent properties—the ‘ilities.’ A second contribution is the separa...

[1]  C. Geertz.  The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays , 1975 .

[2]  Benjamin Esty,et al.  Why Study Large Projects? An Introduction to Research on Project Finance , 2004 .

[3]  Fran Ackermann,et al.  Production , Manufacturing and Logistics Structuring a delay and disruption claim : An application of cause-mapping and system dynamics , 2003 .

[4]  R. Burton,et al.  Strategic Organizational Diagnosis and Design , 1995 .

[5]  O. Williamson.  Markets and hierarchies, analysis and antitrust implications : a study in the economics of internal organization , 1975 .

[6]  D. Mccormick.  Normal Accidents , 1991, Bio/Technology.

[7]  D. L. Marples,et al.  THE DECISIONS OF ENGINEERING DESIGN , 1961, IRE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[8]  W. Scott,et al.  Institutions and Organizations. , 1995 .

[9]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Applying the design structure matrix to system decomposition and integration problems: a review and new directions , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[10]  M. Lewis,et al.  Public Private Partnerships: The Worldwide Revolution in Infrastructure Provision and Project Finance , 2004 .

[11]  L. E. Sullivan,et al.  The SAGE glossary of the social and behavioral sciences , 2009 .

[12]  Raymond E. Levitt,et al.  Towards project management 2.0 , 2011 .

[13]  James M. Lyneis,et al.  Strategic management of complex projects: a case study using system dynamics , 2001 .

[14]  Aaron J. Shenhar,et al.  One Size Does Not Fit All Projects: Exploring Classical Contingency Domains , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[15]  W. Duncan.  A GUIDE TO THE PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE , 1996 .

[16]  R Dewar,et al.  Size, technology, complexity, and structural differentiation: toward a theoretical synthesis. , 1978, Administrative science quarterly.

[17]  William H. Glick,et al.  Typologies As a Unique Form Of Theory Building: Toward Improved Understanding and Modeling , 1994 .

[18]  R. Freeman.  Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[19]  K. Knorr-Cetina,et al.  Epistemic cultures : how the sciences make knowledge , 1999 .

[20]  W. Scott.  Institutions and Organizations: Ideas and Interests , 2007 .

[21]  Benoît Rihoux,et al.  Configurational Comparative Methods , 2011 .

[22]  I. Jawahar,et al.  Toward a Descriptive Stakeholder Theory: an Organizational Life Cycle Approach , 2001 .

[23]  Christopher Alexander,et al.  Notes on the synthesis of form harvard university press , 1968 .

[24]  P. Joskow.  Asset Specificity and the Structure of Vertical Relationships: Empirical Evidence , 1988 .

[25]  Fran Ackermann,et al.  The Effects of Design Changes and Delays on Project Costs , 1995 .

[26]  J. Davidson Frame.  Book Review: Reinventing Project Management: The Diamond Approach to Successful Growth and Innovation , 2008 .

[27]  David N. Ford,et al.  System Dynamics Applied to Project Management: A Survey, Assessment, and Directions for Future Research , 2007, System Dynamics.

[28]  E. Miller.  Technology, Territory, and Time , 1959 .

[29]  William J. Abernathy,et al.  Patterns of Industrial Innovation , 1978 .

[30]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Design Structure Matrix Methods and Applications , 2012 .

[31]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Perspective: Complexity Theory and Organization Science , 1999, Organization Science.

[32]  Børge Obel,et al.  Strategic Organizational Diagnosis and Design: The Dynamics of Fit , 2003 .

[33]  B. Wee,et al.  Decision-making on mega-projects: Cost–benefit analysis, planning, and innovation , 2008 .

[34]  David Baccarini,et al.  The concept of project complexity—a review , 1996 .

[35]  M. Lawson,et al.  A Survey of Concurrent Engineering , 1994 .

[36]  J. R. Turner,et al.  Goals-and-methods matrix: coping with projects with ill defined goals and/or methods of achieving them , 1993 .

[37]  Edward F. Crawley,et al.  Design Structure Matrix Methods and Applications , 2012 .

[38]  Timothy W. Nix,et al.  Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders , 1991 .

[39]  Terry Williams,et al.  Modelling Complex Projects , 2001 .

[40]  Edward W. Merrow,et al.  Industrial Megaprojects: Concepts, Strategies, and Practices for Success , 2011 .

[41]  Roger Miller,et al.  Understanding and Managing Risks in Large Engineering Projects , 2001 .

[42]  W. Scott,et al.  Institutional exceptions on global projects: a process model , 2008 .

[43]  Harvey Maylor,et al.  Rethinking Project Management , 2006 .

[44]  Christopher L. Magee,et al.  Engineering Systems: Meeting Human Needs in a Complex Technological World , 2011 .

[45]  W. Richard Scott,et al.  The institutional environment of global project organizations , 2012 .

[46]  Fran Ackermann,et al.  Modeling for Litigation: Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches , 1997 .

[47]  Roger Miller,et al.  The Strategic Management of Large Engineering Projects: Shaping Institutions, Risks, and Governance , 2001 .

[48]  Eberhardt Rechtin,et al.  The Art of Systems Architecting (3rd Edition) , 2013 .

[49]  Roger Miller,et al.  The shaping of large engineering projects , 2013 .

[50]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[51]  Aaron J. Shenhar,et al.  Reinventing project management : the diamond approach to successful growth & innovation , 2007 .

[52]  E. Rechtin,et al.  The art of systems architecting , 1996, IEEE Spectrum.

[53]  Alexander Verbraeck,et al.  Grasping project complexity in large engineering projects: The TOE (Technical, Organizational and Environmental) framework , 2011 .

[54]  Aaron J. Shenhar,et al.  How Projects Differ, And What to Do About It , 2007 .

[55]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action: Social Science Bases of Administrative Theory , 1967 .

[56]  Christopher Alexander.  Notes on the Synthesis of Form , 1964 .

[57]  Ezekiel Chinyio,et al.  Practical approaches for engaging stakeholders: findings from the UK , 2008 .

[58]  Terry Williams,et al.  The Need for New Paradigms for Complex Projects , 1999 .

[59]  K. Boulding.  General Systems Theory---The Skeleton of Science , 1956 .

[60]  Diane Vaughan,et al.  The Challenger Launch Decision: Risky Technology, Culture, and Deviance at NASA , 1996 .

[61]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  The Art of Continuous Change : Linking Complexity Theory and Time-Paced Evolution in Relentlessly Shifting Organizations , 1997 .

[62]  Terry Williams,et al.  Assessing and moving on from the dominant project management discourse in the light of project overruns , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[63]  John P. Van Gigch,et al.  Applied General Systems Theory , 1974 .

[64]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Identifying Modular and Integrative Systems and Their Impact on Design Team Interactions , 2003 .

[65]  Eberhardt Rechtin.  Systems Architecting of Organizations: Why Eagles Can't Swim , 1999 .

[66]  Aaron J. Shenhar,et al.  Toward a typological theory of project management , 1996 .

[67]  Christopher Findlay,et al.  Financing Public Infrastructure: Darrin Grimsey and Mervyn K Lewis, Public Private Partnerships: The Worldwide Revolution in Infrastructure Provision and Private Finance, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 2004 , 2005 .

[68]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations , 1967 .

[69]  Terry Williams,et al.  Rethinking Project Management: Researching the actuality of projects , 2006 .

[70]  G. A. Miller.  THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[71]  A. Wicks,et al.  Managing for Stakeholders , 2008 .

[72]  R. Hall.  Organizations: Structures, Processes, and Outcomes , 1987 .

[73]  Svetlana. Cicmil,et al.  Insights into collaboration at the project level: complexity, social interaction and procurement mechanisms , 2005 .

[74]  Warren P. Seering,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF ARCHITECTURE IN ENGINEERING SYSTEMS , 2004 .

[75]  Benjamin C. Esty,et al.  Modern Project Finance: A Casebook , 2003 .

[76]  G. Klir.  Complexity: Some general observations , 1985 .

[77]  Raymond E. Levitt,et al.  – Global Projects : Institutional and Political Challenges , 2015 .

[78]  C. Freeman.  Economics of Industrial Innovation , 1975 .

[79]  T. Gladwin.  Culture's Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1981 .

[80]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  The structuring of organizations : a synthesis of the research , 1980 .

[81]  G. A. Miller.  The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. , 1956, Psychological review.

[82]  Göran Ahrne.  Global Projects: Institutional and Political Challenges , 2014 .

[83]  James M. Lyneis,et al.  Learning to learn, from past to future , 2002 .

[84]  Herbert A. Simon,et al.  The Sciences of the Artificial , 1970 .