Inhibition and anticipation in visual search: Evidence from effects of color foreknowledge on preview search

We present four experiments in which we examined the effects of color mixing andprior target color knowledge on preview search (Watson & Humphreys, 1997). The task was to detect a target letter (an N or a Z) that appeared along with other new letters, when old distractors remained in the visual field. In some conditions, participants were told the target’s color; in others, they were not. Foreknowledge of the target’s color produced large improvements in search for both baseline and preview presentations (Experiment 1). For preview presentations, the magnitude of this effect was reduced if the target shared its color with a single colored set of previewed letters (Experiment 2). Removing this similarity across the displays greatly improved search efficiency (Experiment 3). In Experiment 4, we assessed and rejected the proposal that the effects reflected the probability that the target was carried by a particular color. We discuss the results in terms of separate effects of (1) inhibitory carryover from a preview color group and (2) an anticipatory set for a known target color.

[1]  D. Broadbent.  Perception and communication , 1958 .

[2]  A. Treisman,et al.  A feature-integration theory of attention , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. , 1984 .

[4]  H. Egeth,et al.  Searching for conjunctively defined targets. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  S. Tipper.  The Negative Priming Effect: Inhibitory Priming by Ignored Objects , 1985, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[6]  J. Duncan,et al.  Visual search and stimulus similarity. , 1989, Psychological review.

[7]  S. Hochstein,et al.  How Serial is Serial Processing in Vision? , 1989, Perception.

[8]  S. Tipper,et al.  Selection of moving and static objects for the control of spatially directed action. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  A. Treisman,et al.  Conjunction search revisited , 1990 .

[10]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  On the locus of visual selection: evidence from focused attention tasks , 1990 .

[11]  Jeremy M Wolfe,et al.  Modeling the role of parallel processing in visual search , 1990, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  B. DeSchepper,et al.  Costs and benefits of target activation and distractor inhibition in selective attention. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[13]  S. Tipper,et al.  Short Report: Object-Centred Inhibition of Return of Visual Attention , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[14]  M. Bravo,et al.  The role of attention in different visual-search tasks , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[15]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[16]  J. Theeuwes.  Perceptual selectivity for color and form , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  H Egeth,et al.  Consequences of allocating attention to locations and to other attributes , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  F. Wilkinson,et al.  Distractor Ratio and Grouping Processes in Visual Conjunction Search , 1992, Perception.

[19]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Contingent attentional capture: A reply to Yantis (1993). , 1993 .

[20]  S. Yantis.  Stimulus-Driven Attentional Capture , 1993 .

[21]  J Theeuwes,et al.  Visual selective attention: a theoretical analysis. , 1993, Acta psychologica.

[22]  S. Yantis.  Stimulus-driven attentional capture and attentional control settings. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[23]  S. Yantis,et al.  Stimulus-driven attentional capture: evidence from equiluminant visual objects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  S. Tipper,et al.  Behavioural Goals Determine Inhibitory Mechanisms of Selective Attention , 1994 .

[25]  S. Yantis,et al.  Visual motion and attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[26]  J. Theeuwes.  Stimulus-driven capture and attentional set: selective search for color and visual abrupt onsets. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[27]  R W Remington,et al.  The structure of attentional control: contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[28]  H. Egeth,et al.  Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[29]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  SEARCH FOR A CONJUNCTIVELY DEFINED TARGET CAN BE SELECTIVELY LIMITED TO A COLOR-DEFINED SUBSET OF ELEMENTS , 1995 .

[30]  J. Theeuwes.  Perceptual Selectivity for Color and Form: On the Nature of the Interference Effect , 1996 .

[31]  Charles L. Folk,et al.  9. When knowledge does not help: limitations on the flexibility of attentional control , 1996 .

[32]  S. Yantis.  2. Attentional capture in vision , 1996 .

[33]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Visual marking: prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. , 1997, Psychological review.

[34]  H. Egeth,et al.  Goal-directed guidance of attention: evidence from conjunctive visual search. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  Bradley S. Gibson,et al.  Stimulus-Driven Attentional Capture Is Contingent on Attentional Set for Displaywide Visual Features , 1998 .

[36]  H. Egeth,et al.  How does feature-based attention affect visual processing? , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  Derrick G. Watson,et al.  Visual marking of moving objects: a role for top-down feature-based inhibition in selection. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[38]  Jan Theeuwes,et al.  Visual marking of old objects , 1998 .

[39]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Visual Marking of Locations and Feature Maps: Evidence from Within-dimension Defined Conjunctions , 1999 .

[40]  K. Cave.  The FeatureGate model of visual selection , 1999, Psychological research.

[41]  S. Treue,et al.  Reshaping neuronal representations of visual scenes through attention , 1999 .

[42]  K. Cave,et al.  Top-down and bottom-up attentional control: On the nature of interference from a salient distractor , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[43]  S. Yantis,et al.  On the distinction between visual salience and stimulus-driven attentional capture. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[44]  Derrick G. Watson,et al.  Visual marking: Evidence for inhibition using a probe-dot detection paradigm , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[45]  A. Kingstone,et al.  Inhibition of return and visual search: How many separate loci are inhibited? , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[46]  R. Klein,et al.  Inhibition of return , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[47]  B. Gibson,et al.  Visual marking and the perception of salience in visual search , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[48]  H. Koshino,et al.  Activation and inhibition of stimulus features in conjunction search , 2001, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[49]  J Theeuwes,et al.  Visual marking beside the mark: Prioritizing selection by abrupt onsets , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[50]  Min-Shik Kim,et al.  Perceptual grouping via spatial selection in a focused-attention task , 2001, Vision Research.

[51]  Kyle R Cave,et al.  Roles of salience and strategy in conjunction search. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[52]  Dietmar Heinke,et al.  Prioritization in visual search: Visual marking is not dependent on a mnemonic search , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[53]  G. Humphreys,et al.  When visual marking meets the attentional blink: More evidence for top-down, limited capacity inhibition , 2002 .

[54]  Derrick G. Watson,et al.  Fractionating the preview benefit in search: dual-task decomposition of visual marking by timing and modality. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[55]  Derrick G. Watson,et al.  Visual marking and visual change. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[56]  John Hodsoll,et al.  Color grouping in space and time: evidence from negative color-based carryover effects in preview search. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.