Sound propagation and speech transmission in a branching underground tunnel.

The characteristics of sound propagation and speech transmission along a tunnel with a "T" intersection were investigated. At receivers within sight of the sound source, low frequencies were mainly attenuated around the intersection than high frequencies. At receivers out of sight of the source, high frequencies were extensively attenuated. The overall pattern of sound attenuation along the different sections of tunnel, which was calculated by the conical beam method, agreed well with the measurements in this study. Numerical calculations of reflected and diffracted waves with minimum transmission paths in a two-dimensional plane showed that reflected waves were the primary contributors to sound fields out of sight of the source. The articulation scores measured at receivers within sight of the source were high, and most of the confusion concerned syllables that could easily be misheard, even if there were a high signal-to-noise ratio. The types of syllable confusions observed at the receivers out of sight of the source appeared to have been caused by the greater deterioration in speech signals along this part of the tunnel, especially at high frequencies. The evaluation by rapid speech transmission indices (RASTI) appeared to be overestimated at the receivers out of sight of the source. Taking into account the early decay times of impulsive sound and the calculation procedures used in RASTI, it is concluded that speech intelligibility may not have been evaluated correctly by RASTI.

[1]  L D Braida,et al.  Intelligibility of conversational and clear speech in noise and reverberation for listeners with normal and impaired hearing. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  D. Wilson,et al.  Simple, relaxational models for the acoustical properties of porous media , 1997 .

[3]  A. L'esperance,et al.  Outdoor sound propagation in the presence of atmospheric turbulence: Experiments and theoretical analysis with the fast field program algorithm , 1995 .

[4]  Tony F. W. Embleton,et al.  Tutorial on sound propagation outdoors , 1996 .

[5]  A. Duquesnoy.  The intelligibility of sentences in quiet and in noise in aged listeners. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Stephen Dance,et al.  THE COMPLETE IMAGE-SOURCE METHOD FOR THE PREDICTION OF SOUND DISTRIBUTION IN NON-DIFFUSE ENCLOSED SPACES , 1997 .

[7]  A. M. Ondet,et al.  Modeling of sound propagation in fitted workshops using ray tracing , 1989 .

[8]  M. D. Wang,et al.  Consonant confusions in noise: a study of perceptual features. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  R. Kouyoumjian,et al.  A uniform geometrical theory of diffraction for an edge in a perfectly conducting surface , 1974 .

[10]  S. Gelfand,et al.  Effects of small room reverberation upon the recognition of some consonant features , 1979 .

[11]  T. Houtgast,et al.  Predicting speech intelligibility in rooms from the modulation transfer function, I. General room acoustics , 1980 .

[12]  G. Daigle.  Diffraction of sound by a noise barrier in the presence of atmospheric turbulence , 1982 .

[13]  A. Galaitsis,et al.  Prediction of noise distribution in various enclosures from free‐field measurements , 1976 .

[14]  M. Hodgson.  On the prediction of sound fields in large empty rooms , 1988 .

[15]  G A Daigle,et al.  Controlled experiments of the diffraction of sound by a curved surface. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  M Hodgson.  On the accuracy of models for predicting sound propagation in fitted rooms. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  U. Ingard.  On the Reflection of a Spherical Sound Wave from an Infinite Plane , 1951 .

[18]  K S Helfer,et al.  Aging and consonant errors in reverberation and noise. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[19]  S. M. Dance,et al.  The Development of Computer Models for the Prediction of Factory Noise , 1995 .

[20]  A. Nabelek,et al.  Monaural and binaural speech perception in reverberation for listeners of various ages. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  A. M. Mimpen,et al.  Speech-reception threshold for sentences as a function of age and noise level. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  Yannick Gabillet,et al.  Application of the Gaussian beam approach to sound propagation in the atmosphere: Theory and experiments , 1993 .

[23]  K. B. Rasmussen.  Outdoor sound propagation under the influence of wind and temperature gradients , 1986 .

[24]  Harvey Fletcher,et al.  Articulation testing methods , 1929 .

[25]  H. S. Carslaw..  Diffraction of Waves by a Wedge of any Angle , 1920 .

[26]  J. E. Piercy,et al.  Effective flow resistivity of ground surfaces determined by acoustical measurements , 1983 .

[27]  H. Macdonald.  A Class of Diffraction Problems , 2022 .

[28]  Sunao Kunimatsu,et al.  Sound propagation and speech hearing in a curved reverberant tunnel. , 1997 .

[29]  Jean Nicolas,et al.  Sound propagation in the atmospheric surface layer: Comparison of experiment with FFP predictions , 1993 .

[30]  Hisao Tokuyama,et al.  FUNDAMENTAL ANALYSIS OF TRANSMISSION CHARACTERISTICS OF ARTICULATED : Information Loss Analysis of Transient matrices in Articulation test , 1979 .

[31]  B. S. Ramakrishna,et al.  Intelligibility of speech under nonexponential decay conditions. , 1975, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  K. Heinrich Kuttruff.  Sound decay in reverberation chambers with diffusing elements , 1981 .