Cell type specific chromosome territory organization in the interphase nucleus of normal and cancer cells

Numerous studies indicate that the genome of higher eukaryotes is organized into distinct chromosome territories and that the 3‐D arrangement of these territories may be closely connected to genomic function and the global regulation of gene expression. Despite this progress, the degree of non‐random arrangement remains unclear and no overall model has been proposed for chromosome territory associations. To address this issue, a re‐FISH approach was combined with computational analysis to analysis the pair‐wise associations for six pairs of human chromosomes (chr #1, 4, 11, 12, 16, 18) in the G0 state of normal human WI38 lung fibroblast and MCF10A epithelial breast cells. Similar levels of associations were found in WI38 and MCF10A for several of the chromosomes whereas others showed striking differences. A novel computational geometric approach, the generalized median graph (GMG), revealed a preferred probabilistic arrangement distinct for each cell line. Statistical analysis demonstrated that ∼50% of the associations depicted in the GMG models are present in each individual nucleus. A nearly twofold increase of chromosome 4/16 associations in a malignant breast cancer cell line (MCFCA1a) compared to the related normal epithelial cell line (MCF10A) further demonstrates cancer related changes in chromosome arrangements. Our findings of highly preferred chromosome association profiles that are cell type specific and undergo alterations in cancer cells, lead us to propose a probabilistic chromosome code whereby the 3‐D association profile of chromosomes contributes to the functional landscape of the cell nucleus, the global regulation of gene expression and the epigenetic state of chromatin. J. Cell. Physiol. 221: 130–138, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc

[1]  Theodor Boveri,et al.  Die Blastomerenkerne von Ascaris Megalocephala und die Theorie der Chromosomenindividualität , 1909 .

[2]  T. Sørensen,et al.  A method of establishing group of equal amplitude in plant sociobiology based on similarity of species content and its application to analyses of the vegetation on Danish commons , 1948 .

[3]  N. Otsu A threshold selection method from gray level histograms , 1979 .

[4]  L. Manuelidis A view of interphase chromosomes , 1990, Science.

[5]  M. Schmid,et al.  Chromosome topology in mammalian interphase nuclei. , 1991, Experimental cell research.

[6]  R. Berezney,et al.  The nuclear matrix: a structural milieu for genomic function. , 1995, International review of cytology.

[7]  A. Pombo,et al.  Regional and temporal specialization in the nucleus: a transcriptionally‐active nuclear domain rich in PTF, Oct1 and PIKA antigens associates with specific chromosomes early in the cell cycle , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[8]  A. Parreira,et al.  The nuclear topography of ABL, BCR, PML, and RARalpha genes: evidence for gene proximity in specific phases of the cell cycle and stages of hematopoietic differentiation. , 1999, Blood.

[9]  R. Nagele,et al.  Chromosomes exhibit preferential positioning in nuclei of quiescent human cells. , 1999, Journal of cell science.

[10]  Peter Teague,et al.  Differences in the Localization and Morphology of Chromosomes in the Human Nucleus , 1999, The Journal of cell biology.

[11]  M. Nikiforova,et al.  Proximity of chromosomal loci that participate in radiation-induced rearrangements in human cells. , 2000, Science.

[12]  J. Ragoussis,et al.  Large-scale chromatin organization of the major histocompatibility complex and other regions of human chromosome 6 and its response to interferon in interphase nuclei. , 2000, Journal of cell science.

[13]  H. Yokota,et al.  Size-dependent positioning of human chromosomes in interphase nuclei. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[14]  Juliet A. Ellis,et al.  The spatial organization of human chromosomes within the nuclei of normal and emerin-mutant cells. , 2001, Human molecular genetics.

[15]  T. Cremer,et al.  Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[16]  Thomas Cremer,et al.  Spatial preservation of nuclear chromatin architecture during three-dimensional fluorescence in situ hybridization (3D-FISH). , 2002, Experimental cell research.

[17]  Ronald Berezney,et al.  Regulating the mammalian genome: the role of nuclear architecture. , 2002, Advances in enzyme regulation.

[18]  T. Cremer,et al.  Evolutionary conservation of chromosome territory arrangements in cell nuclei from higher primates , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Tom Misteli,et al.  Conservation of Relative Chromosome Positioning in Normal and Cancer Cells , 2002, Current Biology.

[20]  T. Cremer,et al.  Inheritance of gene density–related higher order chromatin arrangements in normal and tumor cell nuclei , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[21]  T. Misteli,et al.  An uncertainty principle in chromosome positioning. , 2003, Trends in cell biology.

[22]  Roland Eils,et al.  Global Chromosome Positions Are Transmitted through Mitosis in Mammalian Cells , 2003, Cell.

[23]  Tom Misteli,et al.  Spatial proximity of translocation-prone gene loci in human lymphomas , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[24]  Thomas Cremer,et al.  Chromosome order in HeLa cells changes during mitosis and early G1, but is stably maintained during subsequent interphase stages , 2003, The Journal of cell biology.

[25]  S. K. Zaidi,et al.  Functional architecture of the nucleus: organizing the regulatory machinery for gene expression, replication and repair. , 2003, Trends in cell biology.

[26]  J. Ellenberg,et al.  Dynamics of chromosome positioning during the cell cycle. , 2003, Current opinion in cell biology.

[27]  W. Bickmore,et al.  Chromatin decondensation and nuclear reorganization of the HoxB locus upon induction of transcription. , 2004, Genes & development.

[28]  T. Misteli,et al.  Spatial genome organization. , 2004, Experimental cell research.

[29]  Tom Misteli,et al.  Spatial Positioning A New Dimension in Genome Function , 2004, Cell.

[30]  T. Cremer,et al.  Specific staining of human chromosomes in Chinese hamster x man hybrid cell lines demonstrates interphase chromosome territories , 2004, Human Genetics.

[31]  Joseph Rosenecker,et al.  Transcription-dependent spatial arrangements of CFTR and adjacent genes in human cell nuclei , 2004, The Journal of cell biology.

[32]  T. Pederson The spatial organization of the genome in mammalian cells. , 2004, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[33]  Thomas Cremer,et al.  Higher order chromatin architecture in the cell nucleus: on the way from structure to function , 2004, Biology of the cell.

[34]  L. Manuelidis,et al.  Individual interphase chromosome domains revealed by in situ hybridization , 2004, Human Genetics.

[35]  Cameron S. Osborne,et al.  Active genes dynamically colocalize to shared sites of ongoing transcription , 2004, Nature Genetics.

[36]  Tom Misteli,et al.  Tissue-specific spatial organization of genomes , 2004, Genome Biology.

[37]  Thomas Cremer,et al.  The architecture of chicken chromosome territories changes during differentiation , 2004, BMC Cell Biology.

[38]  Tomoharu Kiyuna,et al.  Alteration of chromosome positioning during adipocyte differentiation , 2004, Journal of Cell Science.

[39]  Thomas Cremer,et al.  Non-random radial higher-order chromatin arrangements in nuclei of diploid human cells , 2004, Chromosome Research.

[40]  W. Bickmore,et al.  Distinctive nuclear organisation of centromeres and regions involved in pluripotency in human embryonic stem cells , 2005, Journal of Cell Science.

[41]  D. Ward,et al.  Delineation of individual human chromosomes in metaphase and interphase cells by in situ suppression hybridization using recombinant DNA libraries , 1988, Human Genetics.

[42]  R. Eils,et al.  Three-Dimensional Maps of All Chromosomes in Human Male Fibroblast Nuclei and Prometaphase Rosettes , 2005, PLoS biology.

[43]  R. Flavell,et al.  Interchromosomal associations between alternatively expressed loci , 2005, Nature.

[44]  Tom Misteli,et al.  Concepts in nuclear architecture , 2005, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[45]  Thomas Cremer,et al.  Common themes and cell type specific variations of higher order chromatin arrangements in the mouse , 2005, BMC Cell Biology.

[46]  Roland Eils,et al.  Transient colocalization of X-inactivation centres accompanies the initiation of X inactivation , 2006, Nature Cell Biology.

[47]  A. Pombo,et al.  Intermingling of Chromosome Territories in Interphase Suggests Role in Translocations and Transcription-Dependent Associations , 2006, PLoS biology.

[48]  Chia-Lun Tsai,et al.  Transient Homologous Chromosome Pairing Marks the Onset of X Inactivation , 2006, Science.

[49]  Hui Ling Chen,et al.  CTCF Mediates Interchromosomal Colocalization Between Igf2/H19 and Wsb1/Nf1 , 2006, Science.

[50]  Thomas Cremer,et al.  Chromosome territories--a functional nuclear landscape. , 2006, Current opinion in cell biology.

[51]  Richard Axel,et al.  Interchromosomal Interactions and Olfactory Receptor Choice , 2006, Cell.

[52]  M. Lipinski,et al.  Chromatin domains and regulation of transcription. , 2007, Journal of molecular biology.

[53]  Tom Misteli,et al.  Cell biology: Chromosome territories , 2007, Nature.

[54]  Wendy A Bickmore,et al.  Nuclear reorganisation and chromatin decondensation are conserved, but distinct, mechanisms linked to Hox gene activation , 2007, Development.

[55]  T. Cremer,et al.  Evolutionarily conserved, cell type and species-specific higher order chromatin arrangements in interphase nuclei of primates , 2007, Chromosoma.

[56]  R. Schneider,et al.  Dynamics and interplay of nuclear architecture, genome organization, and gene expression. , 2007, Genes & development.

[57]  Gaudenz Danuser,et al.  Positional stability of single double-strand breaks in mammalian cells , 2007, Nature Cell Biology.

[58]  T. Cremer,et al.  Dynamic genome architecture in the nuclear space: regulation of gene expression in three dimensions , 2007, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[59]  Vikas Singh,et al.  Generalized Median Graphs: Theory and Applications , 2007, 2007 IEEE 11th International Conference on Computer Vision.

[60]  E. Heard,et al.  The ins and outs of gene regulation and chromosome territory organisation. , 2007, Current opinion in cell biology.

[61]  Thomas Cremer,et al.  Nuclear architecture: Is it important for genome function and can we prove it? , 2007, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[62]  T. Misteli Beyond the Sequence: Cellular Organization of Genome Function , 2011 .

[63]  T. Misteli,et al.  On the contribution of spatial genome organization to cancerous chromosome translocations. , 2008, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[64]  G. Folle,et al.  Nuclear architecture, chromosome domains and genetic damage. , 2008, Mutation research.

[65]  Daniele Zink,et al.  Nuclear architecture and gene regulation. , 2008, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[66]  Jinhui Xu,et al.  Identifying functional neighborhoods within the cell nucleus: Proximity analysis of early S‐phase replicating chromatin domains to sites of transcription, RNA polymerase II, HP1γ, matrin 3 and SAF‐A , 2008, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[67]  R. Berezney,et al.  Spatio-temporal dynamics of replication and transcription sites in the mammalian cell nucleus , 2008, Chromosoma.

[68]  David L. Spector,et al.  Chromatin Dynamics and Gene Positioning , 2008, Cell.

[69]  D. Thanos,et al.  Virus Infection Induces NF-κB-Dependent Interchromosomal Associations Mediating Monoallelic IFN-β Gene Expression , 2008, Cell.

[70]  Raj Acharya,et al.  A Hybrid Registration Approach for Matching Genomic Structures in Multimodal Microscopic Images of Living Cells , 2008, IPCV.

[71]  S. K. Zaidi,et al.  Genetic and epigenetic regulation in nuclear microenvironments for biological control in cancer , 2008, Journal of cellular biochemistry.

[72]  Jiming Peng,et al.  Generalized median graphs and applications , 2009, J. Comb. Optim..