Designing Robots That Challenge to Optimize Motor Learning

The purpose of this chapter is to provide the reader with a better understanding of the theory and practice of providing effective levels of challenge for people with motor disability, using rehabilitation robotics to provide the safety and assurance that is necessary to prevent physical harm and mental frustration. First, we describe the therapeutic context with which clinicians encounter the need to design challenge into the motor learning sessions that are typical for individuals who are recovering from impaired movement. Second, we explore the challenge point framework as a major breakthrough in our understanding of the nature of challenge in motor performance and how this challenge contributes to efficacious motor learning. Next, we describe ways in which rehabilitation robotics can be designed and implemented to explore the ways in which people with motor disability can learn to move again and how results with these devices suggest extending the challenge point framework to take into account self-efficacy and willingness to practice. Finally, we provide a detailed example of a robotic system that works collaboratively with the clinician to provide physical challenge during walking and balance training in people with poststroke hemiparesis using a library of novel techniques. We conclude by providing further thoughts to engineers and clinicians who collaborate to develop a next generation of rehabilitation robotics that build on the concepts of optimal challenge into the engineering design.

[1]  Michael A Hunt,et al.  Use of the Challenge Point Framework to Guide Motor Learning of Stepping Reactions for Improved Balance Control in People With Stroke: A Case Series , 2013, Physical Therapy.

[2]  Adriano A. G. Siqueira,et al.  Adaptive strategy for multi-user robotic rehabilitation games , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[3]  Charles R. Kelley,et al.  What is Adaptive Training?1 , 1969 .

[4]  C. Richards,et al.  Task-specific physical therapy for optimization of gait recovery in acute stroke patients. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[5]  C. Burgar,et al.  Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper-limb motor function after stroke. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  T. Hornby,et al.  Metabolic Costs and Muscle Activity Patterns During Robotic- and Therapist-Assisted Treadmill Walking in Individuals With Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury , 2006, Physical Therapy.

[7]  Justin B. Rowe,et al.  Design and preliminary evaluation of the FINGER rehabilitation robot: controlling challenge and quantifying finger individuation during musical computer game play , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[8]  D Gravel,et al.  A mechanical model to study the relationship between gait speed and muscular strength. , 1996, IEEE transactions on rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[9]  Birgitta Lindmark,et al.  Self-efficacy in relation to impairments and activities of daily living disability in elderly patients with stroke: a prospective investigation. , 2003, Journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[10]  David J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Comparison of error-amplification and haptic-guidance training techniques for learning of a timing-based motor task by healthy individuals , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[11]  R C Williges,et al.  Learner-centered versus automatic adaptive motor skill training. , 1977, Journal of motor behavior.

[12]  C. Sackley,et al.  Falls, sway, and symmetry of weight-bearing after stroke. , 1991, International disability studies.

[13]  J. Eng,et al.  The relationship of lower-extremity muscle torque to locomotor performance in people with stroke. , 2003, Physical therapy.

[14]  Timothy D. Lee,et al.  PaR (Plan-act-Review) Golf: Motor Learning Research and Improving Golf Skills , 2014 .

[15]  Olivier Lambercy,et al.  Assessment-driven selection and adaptation of exercise difficulty in robot-assisted therapy: a pilot study with a hand rehabilitation robot , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[16]  David J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Slacking by the human motor system: Computational models and implications for robotic orthoses , 2009, 2009 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[17]  N. Mayo,et al.  Relationship between response time and falls among stroke patients undergoing physical rehabilitation , 1990, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[18]  Raul Benitez,et al.  Motor adaptation as a greedy optimization of error and effort. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  M. Guadagnoli,et al.  Challenge Point: A Framework for Conceptualizing the Effects of Various Practice Conditions in Motor Learning , 2004, Journal of motor behavior.

[20]  Richard W. Bohannon Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20-79 years: reference values and determinants. , 1997, Age and ageing.

[21]  S. Nadeau,et al.  Effect of increases in plantarflexor and hip flexor muscle strength on the levels of effort during gait in individuals with hemiparesis. , 2008, Clinical biomechanics.

[22]  S. Delp,et al.  Capacity to increase walking speed is limited by impaired hip and ankle power generation in lower functioning persons post-stroke. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[23]  Peter Wolf,et al.  The effect of haptic guidance and visual feedback on learning a complex tennis task , 2013, Experimental Brain Research.

[24]  Lara A. Boyd,et al.  Is More Better? Using Metadata to Explore Dose–Response Relationships in Stroke Rehabilitation , 2014, Stroke.

[25]  Yvonne Tran,et al.  Relationship between quality of life and self-efficacy in persons with spinal cord injuries. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[26]  Chris H. Mullens,et al.  Maximum walking speeds obtained using treadmill and overground robot system in persons with post-stroke hemiplegia , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[27]  L. Rapport,et al.  Predictors of falls among right-hemisphere stroke patients in the rehabilitation setting. , 1993, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[28]  Daniel Gopher,et al.  Adaptive training of perceptual-motor skills: issues, results, and future directions , 1978 .

[29]  J. Patton,et al.  Evaluation of robotic training forces that either enhance or reduce error in chronic hemiparetic stroke survivors , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[30]  D. Uhlenbrock,et al.  Entwicklung eines Gangtrainers mit geregeltem Servoantrieb zur Rehabilitation gehunfähiger Patienten - Development of a Servo-controlled Gait Trainer for the Rehabilitation of Non-ambulatory Patients , 1997 .

[31]  R. Riener,et al.  Validation of a mechanism to balance exercise difficulty in robot-assisted upper-extremity rehabilitation after stroke , 2012, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[32]  N. Hogan,et al.  The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke. , 1997, Archives of neurology.

[33]  J. Hidler,et al.  Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Lokomat in Subacute Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[34]  S Boccardi,et al.  Functional resources to increase gait speed in people with stroke: strategies adopted compared to healthy controls. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[35]  Rong Song,et al.  A Comparison Between Electromyography-Driven Robot and Passive Motion Device on Wrist Rehabilitation for Chronic Stroke , 2009, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[36]  R. Ryan,et al.  Control and information in the intrapersonal sphere: An extension of cognitive evaluation theory. , 1982 .

[37]  Gert Kwakkel,et al.  Hemiplegic gait after stroke: is measurement of maximum speed required? , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[38]  R W Bohannon,et al.  Walking after stroke: comfortable versus maximum safe speed , 1992, International journal of rehabilitation research. Internationale Zeitschrift fur Rehabilitationsforschung. Revue internationale de recherches de readaptation.

[39]  Robert A. Bjork,et al.  Assessing our own competence: Heuristics and illusions. , 1999 .

[40]  A. Forster,et al.  Incidence and consequences offalls due to stroke: a systematic inquiry , 1995, BMJ.

[41]  Terry E. Duncan,et al.  Long-term maintenance of exercise, self-efficacy, and physiological change in older adults. , 1993, Journal of gerontology.

[42]  T. Demott,et al.  Enhanced Gait-Related Improvements After Therapist- Versus Robotic-Assisted Locomotor Training in Subjects With Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Study , 2008, Stroke.

[43]  D. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury , 2009, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[44]  A. Bandura Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[45]  J C Wall,et al.  A comparison of the range of walking speeds between normal and hemiplegic subjects. , 1995, Scandinavian journal of rehabilitation medicine.

[46]  R. Schwarzer,et al.  Self-efficacy and health behaviours. , 1996 .

[47]  R W Bohannon Strength Deficits Also Predict Gait Performance in Patients with Stroke , 1991, Perceptual and motor skills.

[48]  C. Lang,et al.  Quantifying Real-World Upper-Limb Activity in Nondisabled Adults and Adults With Chronic Stroke , 2015, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[49]  Gabriele Wulf,et al.  Self-Controlled Learning: The Importance of Protecting Perceptions of Competence , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[50]  Robert Riener,et al.  Optimizing learning of a locomotor task: Amplifying errors as needed , 2014, 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[51]  R. Lee Kirby,et al.  Manual wheelchair skills capacity versus performance. , 2012, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[52]  V. Dietz,et al.  Locomotor capacity of spinal cord in paraplegic patients , 1995, Annals of neurology.

[53]  James Gordon,et al.  Feasibility of the adaptive and automatic presentation of tasks (ADAPT) system for rehabilitation of upper extremity function post-stroke , 2011, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[54]  N. Z. Hampton,et al.  Subjective Well-Being Among People with Spinal Cord Injuries , 2004 .

[55]  Donald Hedeker,et al.  Error Augmentation Enhancing Arm Recovery in Individuals With Chronic Stroke , 2014, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[56]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Long term effects of intensity of upper and lower limb training after stroke: a randomised trial , 2002, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[57]  Ann Ashburn,et al.  Fall events among people with stroke living in the community: circumstances of falls and characteristics of fallers. , 2002, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[58]  Keith D Hill,et al.  Balance score and a history of falls in hospital predict recurrent falls in the 6 months following stroke rehabilitation. , 2006, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[59]  A. O'Leary,et al.  Self-efficacy and health. , 1985, Behaviour research and therapy.

[60]  Jaime E. Duarte,et al.  Effects of robotically modulating kinematic variability on motor skill learning and motivation. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[61]  A. Bandura Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. , 1982 .

[62]  David J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  "If I can't do it once, why do it a hundred times?": Connecting volition to movement success in a virtual environment motivates people to exercise the arm after stroke , 2007, 2007 Virtual Rehabilitation.

[63]  Suzete Chiviacowsky,et al.  Self-controlled practice: Autonomy protects perceptions of competence and enhances motor learning , 2014 .

[64]  R W Bohannon,et al.  Muscle strength impairments and gait performance deficits in kidney transplantation candidates. , 1994, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[65]  D.J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Optimizing Compliant, Model-Based Robotic Assistance to Promote Neurorehabilitation , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[66]  R. Riener,et al.  Learning a locomotor task: with or without errors? , 2014, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[67]  W. Rymer,et al.  Robot-assisted reaching exercise promotes arm movement recovery in chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study , 2006, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[68]  Jaime Enrique Duarte Effects of Robotic Challenge Level on Motor Learning, Rehabilitation, and Motivation: The Real-World Challenge Point Framework , 2014 .

[69]  M. Y. Lee,et al.  The sit-to-stand movement in stroke patients and its correlation with falling. , 1998, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[70]  Nicolas Schweighofer,et al.  A Functional Threshold for Long-Term Use of Hand and Arm Function Can Be Determined: Predictions From a Computational Model and Supporting Data From the Extremity Constraint-Induced Therapy Evaluation (EXCITE) Trial , 2009, Physical Therapy.

[71]  Steven J. Spencer Movement Training and Post-Stroke Rehabilitation Using a Six Degree of Freedom Upper-Extremity Robotic Orthosis and Virtual Environment , 2011 .

[72]  D.J. Reinkensmeyer,et al.  Robot-enhanced motor learning: accelerating internal model formation during locomotion by transient dynamic amplification , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering.

[73]  M. Johnston,et al.  Self-care self-efficacy, quality of life, and depression after stroke. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.