Municipal wastewater treatment by microsieving, microfiltration and forward osmosis : Concepts and potentials

Conventional wastewater treatment plants are designed for treating manmade wastewater (e.g., from households and industries) and to protect the environment (e.g., receiving water bodies) and humans from adverse effects.The objective of this work was to investigate the feasibility of treating municipal wastewater without a biological treatment step by applying different separation processes, such as microsieving, microfiltration and forward osmosis. The scope of this work was to treat municipal wastewater with a lower area demand while meeting the Swedish wastewater discharge requirements and allowing for the integration of the new separation techniques with existing full-scale wastewater treatment plants. To achieve these goals, pilot-plant and bench scale studies were conducted using raw municipal wastewater on-site at a full-scale wastewater treatment plant.Two different treatment concepts were identified to be feasible for municipal wastewater treatment based on the experimental findings. The first concept comprised coagulation and anionic flocculation before microsieving with subsequent microfiltration. The second concept only included microsieving and forward osmosis. Both concepts were evaluated for their specific electricity, energy and area demands, including sludge treatment, and were compared with five existing conventional wastewater treatment plants.Both concepts complied with the Swedish wastewater discharge demands for only small- and medium-sized wastewater treatment plants because up to only 65% of the nitrogen was retained. Nevertheless, both concepts achieved high retentions, with ≥96% for biochemical oxygen demand, ≥94% for chemical oxygen demand, and ≥99% for total phosphorus. Furthermore, the evaluation of both concepts showed that the specific electricity demand was 30% lower than the average specific electricity demand for 105 traditional Swedish wastewater treatment plants with population sizes of 1 500-10 000. In addition, the specific area demand could be reduced by at least 73% for existing wastewater treatment plants supporting the same population or a population of equivalent magnitude. Moreover, the results indicated that the new method had positive effects on electricity and energy due to the increased biogas potential compared to conventional wastewater treatment. (Less)

[1]  C. D. Moody,et al.  Forward osmosis extractors , 1976 .

[2]  Yunju Jo,et al.  Membrane hybrid systems in wastewater treatment , 2017 .

[3]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Mining nutrients (N, K, P) from urban source-separated urine by forward osmosis dewatering. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[4]  M. Jensen,et al.  Single-channel water permeabilities of Escherichia coli aquaporins AqpZ and GlpF. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[5]  Rhett Butler,et al.  Opportunities for decentralized treatment, sewer mining and effluent re-use , 1996 .

[6]  Damir Brdjanovic,et al.  Anticipating the next century of wastewater treatment , 2014, Science.

[7]  Kyung-Guen Song,et al.  Treatment of domestic wastewater using microfiltration for reuse of wastewater , 1999 .

[8]  Tzahi Y. Cath,et al.  The sweet spot of forward osmosis: Treatment of produced water, drilling wastewater, and other complex and difficult liquid streams , 2014 .

[9]  Mark Perry,et al.  Challenges in Commercializing Biomimetic Membranes , 2015, Membranes.

[10]  B. Bruggen,et al.  Enhanced performance of a biomimetic membrane for Na2CO3 crystallization in the scenario of CO2 capture , 2016 .

[11]  Tzahi Y Cath,et al.  Removal of trace organic chemicals and performance of a novel hybrid ultrafiltration-osmotic membrane bioreactor. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[12]  A. F. Van Nieuwenhuijzen Scenario Studies into Advanced Particle Removal in the Physical-Chemical Pre-treatment of Wastewater , 2002 .

[13]  D. Abdessemed,et al.  Treatment of primary effluent by coagulation-adsorption-ultrafiltration for reuse , 2003 .

[14]  H. Odegaard,et al.  The effects of polymer characteristics on nano particle separation in humic substances removal by cationic polymer coagulation. , 2004, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[15]  Rong Wang,et al.  Nature Meets Technology: Forward Osmosis Membrane Technology , 2011 .

[16]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Removal of trace organic contaminants by the forward osmosis process , 2013 .

[17]  Tzahi Y. Cath,et al.  Membrane contactor processes for wastewater reclamation in space: II. Combined direct osmosis, osmotic distillation, and membrane distillation for treatment of metabolic wastewater , 2005 .

[18]  Tzahi Y Cath,et al.  Forward osmosis for concentration of anaerobic digester centrate. , 2007, Water research.

[19]  S. Sethi,et al.  Microfiltration of Primary Effluent for Clarification and Microbial Removal , 2002 .

[20]  Gustaf LustiG NitrogeN reductioN at five SwediSh muNicipal waStewater treatmeNt plaNtS coNfigured iN a multi-reactor moviNg Bed Biofilm reactor proceSS Kvävereduktion på fem kommunala avloppsreningsverk i Sverige som tillämpar hela processen med rörliga bärare , 2012 .

[21]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  A forward osmosis-membrane distillation hybrid process for direct sewer mining: system performance and limitations. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  Long D. Nghiem,et al.  Factors governing the pre-concentration of wastewater using forward osmosis for subsequent resource recovery. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[23]  Xiao Hu,et al.  Synthesis of robust and high-performance aquaporin-based biomimetic membranes by interfacial polymerization-membrane preparation and RO performance characterization , 2012 .

[24]  M. Soto,et al.  Effect of previous coagulation in direct ultrafiltration of primary settled municipal wastewater , 2012 .

[25]  Peter Agre,et al.  From structure to disease: the evolving tale of aquaporin biology , 2004, Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology.

[26]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  The role of forward osmosis and microfiltration in an integrated osmotic-microfiltration membrane bioreactor system. , 2015, Chemosphere.

[27]  B. Bruggen,et al.  Use of biomimetic forward osmosis membrane for trace organics removal , 2015 .

[28]  Ying Dong,et al.  Chemical cleaning protocols for thin film composite (TFC) polyamide forward osmosis membranes used for municipal wastewater treatment , 2015 .

[29]  João C. Diniz da Costa,et al.  Processing municipal wastewaters by forward osmosis using CTA membrane , 2014 .

[30]  A. Ravazzini Crossflow ultrafiltration of raw municipal wastewater: investigations using PVDF tubular membranes , 2008 .

[31]  Shiao‐Shing Chen,et al.  Application of forward osmosis on dewatering of high nutrient sludge. , 2013, Bioresource technology.

[32]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Toward Resource Recovery from Wastewater: Extraction of Phosphorus from Digested Sludge Using a Hybrid Forward Osmosis–Membrane Distillation Process , 2014 .

[33]  J. la Cour Jansen,et al.  Microsieving in primary treatment: effect of chemical dosing. , 2016, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[34]  Patricia Luis Alconero,et al.  Forward osmosis: Understanding the hype , 2015 .

[35]  C. D. Moody,et al.  Drinking water from sea water by forward osmosis , 1976 .

[36]  Fenglin Yang,et al.  Influence of spacer on rejection of trace antibiotics in wastewater during forward osmosis process , 2015 .

[37]  A. Szymczyk,et al.  On the amphoteric behavior of Desal DK nanofiltration membranes at low salt concentrations , 2010 .

[38]  Johannes S. Vrouwenvelder,et al.  Water harvesting from municipal wastewater via osmotic gradient: An evaluation of process performance , 2013 .

[39]  Zhengyu Jin,et al.  Application of hybrid coagulation microfiltration with air backflushing to direct sewage concentration for organic matter recovery. , 2015, Journal of hazardous materials.

[40]  Lina Falk Evaluation of Biological Hydrolysis Pre-treatment and the Biogas Potential of Sludge from Compact Waste Water Treatment , 2015 .

[41]  June Sylvia Marks,et al.  Acceptance of water recycling in Australia: National baseline data , 2006 .

[42]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Measuring the zeta (electrokinetic) potential of reverse osmosis membranes by a streaming potential analyzer , 1994 .

[43]  Mogens Henze,et al.  Wastewater Treatment: Biological and Chemical Processes , 1995 .

[44]  Zhichao Wu,et al.  A pilot-scale forward osmosis membrane system for concentrating low-strength municipal wastewater: performance and implications , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[45]  R. Aim,et al.  Treatment of wastewater by ultrafiltration , 1999 .

[46]  S. B. Sachs,et al.  Hybrid reverse osmosis — ultrafiltration membranes , 1976 .

[47]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  High performance thin-film composite forward osmosis membrane. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[48]  María Molinos-Senante,et al.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of sewer mining versus centralized wastewater treatment: Case study of the Arga river basin, Spain , 2016 .

[49]  Victor Yangali-Quintanilla,et al.  Rejection of micropollutants by clean and fouled forward osmosis membrane. , 2011, Water research.

[50]  G. Tchobanoglous,et al.  Ultrafiltration as an advanced tertiary treatment process for municipal wastewater , 1998 .

[51]  A. W. Day,et al.  Disinfection and Clarification of Treated Sewage by Advanced Microfiltration , 1991 .

[52]  A. F. van Nieuwenhuijzen,et al.  Direct ultrafiltration of municipal wastewater: comparison between filtration of raw sewage and primary clarifier effluent , 2005 .

[53]  Long D. Nghiem,et al.  Rejection of pharmaceutically active compounds by forward osmosis: Role of solution pH and membrane orientation , 2012 .

[54]  Richard E. Kravath,et al.  Desalination of sea water by direct osmosis , 1975 .

[55]  Michael Flynn,et al.  Membrane contactor processes for wastewater reclamation in space Part I. Direct osmotic concentration as pretreatment for reverse osmosis , 2005 .

[56]  K. Ahn,et al.  Application of microfiltration with a novel fouling control method for reuse of wastewater from a large-scale resort complex , 2000 .

[57]  V Brown,et al.  2009 Melbourne metropolitan sewerage strategy: a portfolio of decentralised and on-site concept designs. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[58]  A. F. van Nieuwenhuijzen,et al.  Direct Wastewater Membrane Filtration for Advanced Particle Removal from Raw Wastewater , 2000 .

[59]  B. Rusten,et al.  Evaluation and testing of fine mesh sieve technologies for primary treatment of municipal wastewater. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[60]  Irena Petrinić,et al.  Towards new membrane-based technologies for water treatment and reuse in the textile industry , 2014 .

[61]  Tai‐Shung Chung,et al.  The role of sulphonated polymer and macrovoid-free structure in the support layer for thin-film comp , 2011 .

[62]  Chuyang Y. Tang,et al.  Rejection of pharmaceuticals by forward osmosis membranes. , 2012, Journal of hazardous materials.

[63]  K. Kimura,et al.  Direct membrane filtration of municipal wastewater with chemically enhanced backwash for recovery of organic matter. , 2013, Bioresource technology.

[64]  Kees Roest,et al.  Water recovery from sewage using forward osmosis. , 2011, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[65]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Comparison of the removal of hydrophobic trace organic contaminants by forward osmosis and reverse osmosis. , 2012, Water research.

[66]  L. Rietveld,et al.  Forward osmosis for application in wastewater treatment: a review. , 2014, Water research.

[67]  Long D. Nghiem,et al.  Phosphorus recovery from digested sludge centrate using seawater-driven forward osmosis , 2016 .

[68]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Effects of feed and draw solution temperature and transmembrane temperature difference on the rejection of trace organic contaminants by forward osmosis , 2013 .

[69]  Tzahi Y Cath,et al.  Comprehensive bench- and pilot-scale investigation of trace organic compounds rejection by forward osmosis. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[70]  Yue Cui,et al.  Novel forward osmosis process to effectively remove heavy metal ions , 2014 .

[71]  S. Chesters,et al.  The safe use of cationic flocculants with reverse osmosis membranes , 2009 .

[72]  Michal Green,et al.  Low strength graywater characterization and treatment by direct membrane filtration , 2004 .

[73]  Feng Liu,et al.  Characterization of organic membrane foulants in a forward osmosis membrane bioreactor treating anaerobic membrane bioreactor effluent. , 2014, Bioresource technology.