Directions and Magnitudes of Misregistration of CT Attenuation-Corrected Myocardial Perfusion Studies: Incidence, Impact on Image Quality, and Guidance for Reregistration

CT-based attenuation-corrected (AC) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) studies may show significant artifacts caused by misregistration between SPECT and CT data. The present study aimed at identifying the directions and magnitudes of misregistration with greatest impact on AC myocardial perfusion image quality. Methods: The incidence, magnitude, and direction of misregistration were assessed in 248 consecutive stress–rest MPI studies in 124 patients. In addition, cardiac SPECT/CT registration was artificially modified in 40 studies, shifting CT data by ±1, ±2, and ±3 pixels along the cephalad/caudal, dorsal/ventral, and left/right axes. Percentage of change in 5-wall AC-MPI polar map scoring was calculated for each region, and the direction of the shift along each axis was analyzed statistically (Student t test, P < 0.05) and compared to determine the region most significantly affected by each shift (Newman–Keuls test, P < 0.05). Changes in the normal and abnormal summed stress score (SSS) due to artificial misregistration were assessed (κ-statistics, McNemar differences). Results: SPECT/CT misregistration of more than 1 pixel was found in 73% (181/248) of studies and more than 2 pixels in 23% of studies (57/248). A 3-pixel ventral shift most significantly affected polar map scoring (−15.4% ± 6.1% change in lateral wall; −7.5% ± 5.5% change in inferior wall). A 3-pixel dorsal shift resulted in a −9.5% ± 5.3% apical and −8.8% ± 5.8% septal change. Polar map scoring was least affected by the cephalad/caudal shift (<5% average change in all regions except for the anterior wall; −9.9% ± 7.4% change for 3-pixel caudal shift). The most significant changes occurred in the lateral and anterior walls when the myocardium on SPECT overlapped lung tissue on CT, encountered in 16% of studies (40/248). Clinically significant changes (in SSS) occurred for the 3-pixel caudal, dorsal, and right shifts. Conclusion: A misregistration of significant magnitude occurred in 23% of studies and in the direction of the most severe artifacts in 16% of studies. Severe misregistration along the dorsal/ventral axis most significantly affected AC-MPI. Quality control of SPECT and CT registration and manual realignment should be performed routinely, with the highest priority in AC studies showing an overlay of the myocardium on SPECT with lung tissue on the CT component of AC-MPI.

[1]  D. Berman,et al.  Quantitative Diagnostic Performance of Myocardial Perfusion SPECT with Attenuation Correction in Women , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[2]  Brian F. Hutton,et al.  Sources of attenuation-correction artefacts in cardiac PET/CT and SPECT/CT , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[3]  F. Bengel,et al.  Attenuation Correction in Myocardial Perfusion SPECT/CT: Effects of Misregistration and Value of Reregistration , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  Tinsu Pan,et al.  Frequent Diagnostic Errors in Cardiac PET/CT Due to Misregistration of CT Attenuation and Emission PET Images: A Definitive Analysis of Causes, Consequences, and Corrections , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[5]  Richard L Wahl,et al.  Prevalence of misregistration between SPECT and CT for attenuation-corrected myocardial perfusion SPECT , 2007, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[6]  K. Nichols How serious a problem for myocardial perfusion assessment is moderate misregistration between SPECT and CT? , 2007, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[7]  Nassir Navab,et al.  Artifacts from misaligned CT in cardiac perfusion PET/CT studies: frequency, effects, and potential solutions. , 2007, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  Takeshi Nakaura,et al.  Object-specific attenuation correction at SPECT/CT in thorax: optimization of respiratory protocol for image registration. , 2005, Radiology.

[9]  Frans J. Th. Wackers,et al.  Clinical validation of SPECT attenuation correction using x-ray computed tomography—derived attenuation maps: Multicenter clinical trial with angiographic correlation , 2005, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[10]  Randall C. Thompson,et al.  Value of attenuation correction on ECG-gated SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging related to body mass index , 2005, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[11]  Richard S Lawson,et al.  Attenuation correction of myocardial SPECT studies using low resolution computed tomography images , 2005, Nuclear medicine communications.

[12]  Oliver Lindner,et al.  A method to remove artifacts in attenuation-corrected myocardial perfusion SPECT Introduced by misalignment between emission scan and CT-derived attenuation maps. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  Catalin Loghin,et al.  Common artifacts in PET myocardial perfusion images due to attenuation-emission misregistration: clinical significance, causes, and solutions. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[14]  R. Hendel,et al.  American Society of Nuclear Cardiology and Society of Nuclear Medicine joint position statement: Attenuation correction of myocardial perfusion SPECT scintigraphy , 2004, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[15]  K. Murase,et al.  Attenuation correction of myocardial SPECT images with X-ray CT: Effects of registration errors between X-ray CT and SPECT , 2002, Annals of nuclear medicine.

[16]  M Schwaiger,et al.  Effects of misalignment between transmission and emission scans on attenuation-corrected cardiac SPECT. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[17]  D. Berman,et al.  Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction. , 1998, Circulation.

[18]  D R Gilland,et al.  Effect of registration errors between transmission and emission scans on a SPECT system using sequential scanning. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[19]  E. Depuey,et al.  Using gated technetium-99m-sestamibi SPECT to characterize fixed myocardial defects as infarct or artifact. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[20]  D. Gilland,et al.  Implementation of simultaneous attenuation and detector response correction in SPECT , 1988 .

[21]  Ernest V. Garcia,et al.  Spect attenuation correction: an essential tool to realize nuclear cardiology’s manifest destiny , 2007, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[22]  Piotr J. Slomka,et al.  Attenuation correction in cardiac spect: the boy who cried wolf? , 2007, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[23]  H. Malcolm Hudson,et al.  Accelerated image reconstruction using ordered subsets of projection data , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.