Integrating cognitive load theory with other theories, within and beyond educational psychology.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS The long-standing aim of cognitive load theory (CLT) has been to generate instructional design principles that show teachers how to instruct students effectively, based on knowledge of the intricacies of human cognitive architecture. Historically, the focus of CLT has been on identifying cognitive processes related to learning and instruction. However, the theory has become more multidisciplinary over time, drawing on theoretical perspectives both within, and beyond, educational psychology. RESULTS This Editorial presents a brief historical overview of key developments in CLT and seven key themes that are pertinent to research on CLT. These themes are as follows: Level of Expertise, Cognitive Load Measurement, Embodied Cognition, Self-Regulated Learning, Emotion Induction, Replenishment of Working Memory, and Two Subprocessors of Working Memory. Summaries of the nine empirical contributions to the special issue are presented and discussed in relation to how they provide insight into one or more of these themes. CONCLUSIONS Understanding the variables that impact student learning and instruction has always represented the core aim of CLT. The growing multidisciplinary features of CLT should provide researchers and practitioners with more holistic perspectives of the factors that predict student learning and, in turn, guide instructional design.

[1]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  Improving English language skills through learning Mathematic contents: From the expertise reversal effect perspective. , 2023, The British journal of educational psychology.

[2]  Roland Brünken,et al.  Digital ink and differentiated subjective ratings for cognitive load measurement in middle childhood. , 2023, The British journal of educational psychology.

[3]  Anique B. H. de Bruin,et al.  Understanding effort regulation: Comparing 'Pomodoro' breaks and self-regulated breaks. , 2023, The British journal of educational psychology.

[4]  J. Plass,et al.  Different types of redundancy and their effect on learning and cognitive load. , 2023, The British journal of educational psychology.

[5]  F. Paas,et al.  Pupillometric and blink measures of diverse task loads: Implications for working memory models. , 2022, The British journal of educational psychology.

[6]  A. Renkl,et al.  Can prior knowledge increase task complexity? - Cases in which higher prior knowledge leads to higher intrinsic cognitive load. , 2022, The British journal of educational psychology.

[7]  Björn B. de Koning,et al.  Effects of finger and mouse pointing on learning from online split-attention examples. , 2022, The British journal of educational psychology.

[8]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  Expertise reversal effect in a pen-tablet-based learning environment: The role of learningcentered emotions in the interplay between learner expertise and task complexity. , 2022, The British journal of educational psychology.

[9]  B. D. Koning,et al.  Investigating the role of hand perspective in learning from procedural animations. , 2022, The British journal of educational psychology.

[10]  Juan C. Castro-Alonso,et al.  Latest trends to optimize computer-based learning: Guidelines from cognitive load theory , 2020, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[11]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Thirty years of research on online learning , 2018, Applied Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  David F. Feldon,et al.  Self-efficacy change associated with a cognitive load-based intervention in an undergraduate biology course , 2018, Learning and Instruction.

[13]  Tina Seufert,et al.  Development and Validation of Two Instruments Measuring Intrinsic, Extraneous, and Germane Cognitive Load , 2017, Front. Psychol..

[14]  Logan Fiorella,et al.  It’s All a Matter of Perspective: Viewing First-Person Video Modeling Examples Promotes Learning of an Assembly Task , 2017 .

[15]  Paul Ginns,et al.  Learning By Tracing Worked Examples , 2016 .

[16]  Roland Brünken,et al.  Emotional design and positive emotions in multimedia learning: An eyetracking study on the use of anthropomorphisms , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[17]  John Sweller,et al.  The worked example effect, the generation effect, and element interactivity. , 2015 .

[18]  Fred Paas,et al.  Animations showing Lego manipulative tasks: Three potential moderators of effectiveness , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[19]  Björn B. de Koning,et al.  Gestures in Instructional Animations: A Helping Hand to Understanding Non-human Movements? , 2013 .

[20]  Fred Paas,et al.  Effects of simultaneously observing and making gestures while studying grammar animations on cognitive load and learning , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[21]  John Dunlosky,et al.  Overconfidence produces underachievement: Inaccurate self evaluations undermine students’ learning and retention , 2012 .

[22]  Slava Kalyuga,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory , 2011 .

[23]  J. Sweller,et al.  Natural Information Processing Systems , 2006 .

[24]  David C. Geary,et al.  The Origin of Mind: Evolution of Brain, Cognition, and General Intelligence , 2004 .

[25]  A. Bandura Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[26]  Paul Chandler,et al.  Levels of Expertise and Instructional Design , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[27]  P. Chandler,et al.  Why Some Material Is Difficult to Learn , 1994 .

[28]  David C. Berliner,et al.  Telling the Stories of Educational Psychology , 1992 .

[29]  J. Sweller,et al.  The Use of Worked Examples as a Substitute for Problem Solving in Learning Algebra , 1985 .

[30]  J. Sweller,et al.  Consequences of history-cued and means–end strategies in problem solving. , 1982 .

[31]  Roland Brünken,et al.  Does cognitive load moderate the seductive details effect? A multimedia study , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[32]  Paul Chandler,et al.  Contemporary cognitive load theory research: The good, the bad and the ugly , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[33]  G. A. Miller The magical number seven plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. , 1956, Psychological review.