Whole-tooth regeneration: it takes a village of scientists, clinicians, and patients.

A team of senior scientists was formed in 2006 to create a blueprint for the regeneration of whole human teeth along with all of the supporting structure of the dentition. The team included experts from diverse fields, each with a reputation for stellar accomplishment. Participants attacked the scientific issues of tooth regeneration but, more importantly, each agreed to work collaboratively with experts from other disciplines to form a learning organization. A commitment to learn from one another produced a unique interdisciplinary and multidisciplinary team. Inspired by the Kennedy space program to send a man to the moon, with its myriad of problems and solutions that no one discipline could solve, this tooth regeneration team devised an ambitious plan that sought to use stem cell biology, engineering, and computational biology to replicate the developmental program for odontogenesis. In this manner, team members envisioned a solution that consisted of known or knowable fundamentals. They proposed a laboratory-grown tooth rudiment that would be capable of executing the complete program for odontogenesis when transplanted to a suitable host, recreating all of the dental tissues, periodontal ligament, cementum, and alveolar bone associated with the canonical tooth. This plan was designed to bring regenerative medicine fully into the dental surgery suite, although a lack of funding has so far prevented the plan from being carried out.

[1]  Stan Gronthos,et al.  SHED: Stem cells from human exfoliated deciduous teeth , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  A. Mata,et al.  Bioactive Nanofibers Instruct Cells to Proliferate and Differentiate During Enamel Regeneration , 2008, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[3]  Samuel I Stupp,et al.  Heparin binding nanostructures to promote growth of blood vessels. , 2006, Nano letters.

[4]  A. Jen,et al.  Assembly of nanomaterials through highly ordered self-assembled monolayers and peptide-organic hybrid conjugates as templates. , 2007, Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology.

[5]  J. Jansen,et al.  Multilineage differentiation potential of stem cells derived from human dental pulp after cryopreservation. , 2006, Tissue engineering.

[6]  C. S. Young,et al.  Test-tube teeth. , 2005 .

[7]  Y. A. Wang,et al.  Localization of Putative Stem Cells in Dental Epithelium and Their Association with Notch and Fgf Signaling , 1999, The Journal of cell biology.

[8]  T. Yamashiro,et al.  Wnt10a regulates dentin sialophosphoprotein mRNA expression and possibly links odontoblast differentiation and tooth morphogenesis. , 2007, Differentiation; research in biological diversity.

[9]  P. Janmey,et al.  Effects of substrate stiffness on cell morphology, cytoskeletal structure, and adhesion. , 2005, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[10]  C. Chuong,et al.  An Integrated Gene Regulatory Network Controls Stem Cell Proliferation in Teeth , 2007, PLoS biology.

[11]  Kai Wang,et al.  Automated functional classification of experimental and predicted protein structures , 2006, BMC Bioinformatics.

[12]  I. Thesleff,et al.  Signalling networks regulating dental development , 1997, Mechanisms of Development.

[13]  Monica Olvera de la Cruz,et al.  Supramolecular self-assembly codes for functional structures , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[14]  Ram Samudrala,et al.  An automated assignment-free Bayesian approach for accurately identifying proton contacts from NOESY data , 2006, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[15]  R. Maas,et al.  The genetic control of early tooth development. , 1997, Critical reviews in oral biology and medicine : an official publication of the American Association of Oral Biologists.

[16]  Krista L. Niece,et al.  Selective Differentiation of Neural Progenitor Cells by High-Epitope Density Nanofibers , 2004, Science.

[17]  Cun-Yu Wang,et al.  Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Mediated Functional Tooth Regeneration in Swine , 2006, PloS one.

[18]  Ersin Emre Oren,et al.  BIOINFORMATICS ORIGINAL PAPER doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btm436 Sequence analysis , 2022 .

[19]  I. Thesleff,et al.  Regulation of epithelial stem cells in tooth regeneration. , 2007, Comptes rendus biologies.

[20]  A. Kulkarni,et al.  Amelogenin: a potential regulator of cementum-associated genes. , 2003, Journal of periodontology.

[21]  I. Thesleff,et al.  Affecting tooth morphology and renewal by fine-tuning the signals mediating cell and tissue interactions. , 2007, Novartis Foundation symposium.

[22]  H. Slavkin,et al.  Prospects for tooth regeneration in the 21st century: A perspective , 2003, Microscopy research and technique.

[23]  Ram Samudrala,et al.  The effect of experimental resolution on the performance of knowledge-based discriminatory functions for protein structure selection. , 2006, Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS.

[24]  S. Stupp,et al.  Supramolecular Materials: Self-Organized Nanostructures , 1997, Science.

[25]  Alexander A Spector,et al.  Emergent patterns of growth controlled by multicellular form and mechanics. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  E. Donald,et al.  Mechanochemical Switching between Growth and Differentiation during Fibroblast Growth Factor-stimulated Angiogenesis In Vitro : Role of Extracellular Matrix , 2002 .

[27]  M. Somerman,et al.  Advances in defining regulators of cementum development and periodontal regeneration. , 2007, Current topics in developmental biology.

[28]  J. Sung,et al.  Lentivirus‐mediated RNA interference targeting enhancer of zeste homolog 2 inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma growth through down‐regulation of stathmin , 2007, Hepatology.