Affinity-based Interpretation of Triangle Social Scenarios

Computational interpretation of social scenarios is a critical step towards more human-like artificial intelligence. We present a model that interprets social scenarios by deducing the affinities of the constituent relationships. First, our model deploys Bayesian inference with an action affinity lexicon to infer probabilistic affinity relations characterizing the scenario. Subsequently, our model is able to use the inferred affinity relations to choose the most probable statement from multiple plausible statements about the scenario. We evaluate our approach on 80 Triangle-COPA multiple-choice problems that test interpretation of social scenarios. Our approach correctly answers the majority (59) of the 80 questions (73.75%), including questions about behaviors, emotions, social conventions, and complex constructs. Our model maintains interpretive power while using knowledge captured in the lightweight action affinity lexicon. Our model is a promising approach to interpretation of social scenarios, and we identify potential applications to automated narrative analysis, AI narrative generation, and assistive technology.

[1]  Andrew S. Gordon,et al.  Commonsense Interpretation of Triangle Behavior , 2016, AAAI.

[2]  Leora Morgenstern,et al.  A First-order Theory of Communication and Multi-agent Plans , 2005, J. Log. Comput..

[3]  A. Tversky,et al.  On the study of statistical intuitions , 1982, Cognition.

[4]  Alka Parikh,et al.  About the study , 2012 .

[5]  Andrew S. Gordon,et al.  One Hundred Challenge Problems for Logical Formalizations of Commonsense Psychology , 2015, AAAI Spring Symposia.

[6]  Franco Moretti Network theory, plot analysis , 2011 .

[7]  F. Heider Attitudes and cognitive organization. , 1946, The Journal of psychology.

[8]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  “A 30% Chance of Rain Tomorrow”: How Does the Public Understand Probabilistic Weather Forecasts? , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[9]  Andrew M. Johnson,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of the Reading Comprehension Skills of Individuals on the Autism Spectrum , 2012, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.

[10]  D. Kahneman,et al.  When More Pain Is Preferred to Less: Adding a Better End , 1993 .

[11]  M. D. Rutherford,et al.  Social perception : detection and interpretation of animacy, agency, and intention , 2013 .

[12]  F. Jean First-Order Theory , 2014 .

[13]  A. Mehrabian Pleasure-arousal-dominance: A general framework for describing and measuring individual differences in Temperament , 1996 .

[14]  F. Heider,et al.  An experimental study of apparent behavior , 1944 .

[15]  Pablo Gervás,et al.  Computational Approaches to Storytelling and Creativity , 2009, AI Mag..

[16]  Christopher M. Danforth,et al.  The emotional arcs of stories are dominated by six basic shapes , 2016, EPJ Data Science.

[17]  Jerry R. Hobbs,et al.  A Commonsense Theory of Mind-Body Interaction , 2011, AAAI Spring Symposium: Logical Formalizations of Commonsense Reasoning.

[18]  Anthony Bonato,et al.  Mining and Modeling Character Networks , 2016, WAW.

[19]  A. Premack,et al.  Infants Attribute Value to the Goal-Directed Actions of Self-propelled Objects , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  F. Harary,et al.  STRUCTURAL BALANCE: A GENERALIZATION OF HEIDER'S THEORY1 , 1977 .