Impact of Uncertainty Quantification on Design Decisions for a Hydraulic-Hybrid Powertrain Engine

The method for solving an optimal design problem under uncertainty depends on how the latter is quantified. When sufficient information is available the popular probabilistic approach can (and should) be adopted. In reality however, we often do not have sufficient data to infer appropriate probability distributions for the uncertain quantities modeled as random variables. The amount of available information about the uncertain quantities may be limited to ranges of values (intervals). In this case, the interval analysis approach can be employed to reformulate and solve the optimal design problem. In this study, we use both approaches to solve an engine design optimization problem that considers fuel economy and acceleration performance of a medium-sized truck with a hydraulic-hybrid powertrain. We then contrast the obtained results and comment on the characteristics and features of the two approaches. We also demonstrate an extension of the interval analysis approach to multilevel systems using a simple yet illustrative engine-related example.

[1]  L. Zadeh Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility , 1999 .

[2]  Y.-T. Wu,et al.  CDF sensitivity analysis technique for ranking influential parameters in the performance assessment of the proposed high-level waste repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada, USA , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[3]  Zoran Filipi,et al.  Fuel Cell APU for Silent Watch and Mild Electrification of a Medium Tactical Truck , 2004 .

[4]  T. Ross Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications , 1994 .

[5]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Design Optimization of Hierarchically Decomposed Multilevel Systems Under Uncertainty , 2006, DAC 2004.

[6]  Charles Audet,et al.  Mesh Adaptive Direct Search Algorithms for Constrained Optimization , 2006, SIAM J. Optim..

[7]  Charles Audet,et al.  Analysis of Generalized Pattern Searches , 2000, SIAM J. Optim..

[8]  Zoran Filipi,et al.  Design Under Uncertainty and Assessment of Performance Reliability of a Dual-Use Medium Truck with Hydraulic-Hybrid Powertrain and Fuel Cell Auxiliary Power Unit , 2005 .

[9]  Zoran Filipi,et al.  Validation and Use of SIMULINK Integrated, High Fidelity, Engine-In-Vehicle Simulation of the International Class VI Truck , 2000 .

[10]  R. Haftka,et al.  Structural design under bounded uncertainty-optimization with anti-optimization , 1994 .

[11]  Jun Zhou,et al.  Reliability Estimation and Design with Insufficient Data Based on Possibility Theory , 2004 .

[12]  J. Tu,et al.  A Single-Loop Method for Reliability-Based Design Optimization , 2004, DAC 2004.

[13]  Panos Y. Papalambros,et al.  Design Optimization and Reliability Estimation with Incomplete Uncertainty Information , 2006 .

[14]  Panos M. Pardalos,et al.  Encyclopedia of Optimization , 2006 .

[15]  Zoran Filipi,et al.  Combined optimisation of design and power management of the hydraulic hybrid propulsion system for the 6 × 6 medium truck , 2004 .