The Use of Influence Tactics in Persuasion

Abstract American undergraduates (N = 154) were presented with vignettes in which a downward influence situation was described, together with conditions of (a) the types of jobs of the agent and target of the influence situation, (b) the role identities of the actors, and (c) the goal of the actor attempting to influence the target. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test the hypothesis that the preference order for influence tactics would be invariant across situations (cf. Rule, Bisanz, & Kohn, 1985). The likelihood and relative degree to which the influence tactics were predicted to be used were similar across situations, providing support for the schema-based notion of a “persuade package.”

[1]  Cecilia M. Falbe,et al.  Importance of different power sources in downward and lateral relations , 1991 .

[2]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Schemata and Sequential Thought Processes in PDP Models , 1986 .

[3]  Stuart M. Schmidt,et al.  Upward-influence styles: Relationship with performance evaluations, salary, and stress. , 1988 .

[4]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[5]  B. G. Rule,et al.  Gender and the Persuasion Schema , 1989 .

[6]  Thomas L. Case,et al.  HOW MANAGERS INFLUENCE SUPERIORS: A STUDY OF UPWARD INFLUENCE TACTICS , 1988 .

[7]  W. Estes,et al.  Toward a framework for combining connectionist and symbol-processing models☆ , 1988 .

[8]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis : The effect of sample size , 1988 .

[9]  D. G. Pruitt,et al.  COMPLAINANT‐RESPONDENT DIFFERENCES IN PROCEDURAL CHOICE , 1993 .

[10]  A. Graesser Prose Comprehension Beyond the Word , 1981 .

[11]  G. Bower,et al.  From conditioning to category learning: an adaptive network model. , 1988 .

[12]  J. Tedeschi,et al.  The Effect of Credibility on Perceived Power1 , 1993 .

[13]  D. Kipnis,et al.  Intraorganizational Influence Tactics: Explorations in Getting One's Way , 1980 .

[14]  Cecilia M. Falbe,et al.  Influence tactics and objectives in upward, downward, and lateral influence attempts. , 1990 .

[15]  Jack M. Feldman,et al.  Beyond Attribution Theory: Cognitive Processes in Performance Appraisal , 1981 .

[16]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Overall Fit in Covariance Structure Models: Two Types of Sample Size Effects , 1990 .

[17]  Walter C. Borman,et al.  Personal constructs, performance schemata, and “folk theories” of subordinate effectiveness: Explorations in an army officer sample☆ , 1987 .

[18]  Chester A. Schriesheim,et al.  Influence tactics used by subordinates: A theoretical and empirical analysis and refinement of the Kipnis, Schmidt, and Wilkinson subscales. , 1990 .

[19]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Concepts, propositions, and schemata: what are the cognitive units? , 1980, Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation.

[20]  J. Lachman,et al.  Cognitive Psychology and Information Processing: An Introduction , 1979 .

[21]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[22]  D. G. Pruitt,et al.  Aggression as a struggle tactic in social conflict. , 1993 .

[23]  Roseanne J. Foti,et al.  A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions , 1984 .

[24]  D. Tjosvold,et al.  Influence strategy, perspective-taking, and relationships between high- and low-power individuals in cooperative and competitive contexts. , 1984 .

[25]  Roger C. Schank,et al.  SCRIPTS, PLANS, GOALS, AND UNDERSTANDING , 1988 .

[26]  M. Ansari,et al.  Organizational context and upward influence tactics , 1987 .

[27]  P. Bentler,et al.  Comparative fit indexes in structural models. , 1990, Psychological bulletin.

[28]  Walter Schneider,et al.  Controlled and automatic human information processing: II. Perceptual learning, automatic attending and a general theory. , 1977 .

[29]  B. G. Rule,et al.  Anatomy of a persuasion schema: Targets, goals, and strategies. , 1985 .

[30]  J. Tedeschi,et al.  PERCEPTIONS OF POWER: A COGNITIVE PERSPECTIVE , 1994 .

[31]  Mauk Mulder,et al.  Power, situation, and leaders' effectiveness: An organizational field study. , 1986 .

[32]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  The appeal of parallel distributed processing , 1986 .

[33]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: User's Reference Guide , 1997 .