Adding connectivity and losing context with ICT: contrasting learning situations from a community of practice perspective

The promise of information and communication technologies is that it increases connectivity. By providing a spectrum of technologies such as email, web conferencing, telephones, and chat, ICTs bring people who are geographically dispersed together in community. Such communities can provide a new context for learning; at the same time, the social, physical, and technical context of the community's members risks getting lost through computer-mediated communication. Design for online communities, especially design for learning in online environments, tries to find ways of re-inviting participants' contexts, as context has a great bearing on learning, in fact is inextricably linked to learning. In this paper we investigate the complex relationship of context, technologies and community design issues. We present three case studies of online learning communities and analyze the interplay of context and technology for each situation, using a community of practice perspective. Each case balances the demands of time, the need for context, and the demands of practice in a unique way. The insights gained can inform both educational design and design of community technologies.

[1]  Volker Wulf,et al.  Evolving Cooperation when Introducing Groupware: A Self-Organization Perspective , 1999, Cybern. Hum. Knowing.

[2]  W. Wong,et al.  On ψ-Learning , 2003 .

[3]  N. Hara.  STUDENT DISTRESS IN A WEB-BASED DISTANCE EDUCATION COURSE , 2000 .

[4]  P. Kollock,et al.  The economies of online cooperation , 2002 .

[5]  J. Walther,et al.  Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction , 1990 .

[6]  Heinz Mandl,et al.  WENN NEUE MEDIEN NEUE FRAGEN AUFWERFEN , 1998 .

[7]  Margaret Haughey,et al.  Building Learning Communities in Cyberspace: Effective Strategies for the Online Classroom by Rena M. Palloff and Keith Pratt , 2000 .

[8]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[9]  Hazel Hall,et al.  Organizational knowledge and communities of practice , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[10]  Y. Malhotra.  Knowledge management and Business Model Innovation , 2001 .

[11]  Patricia Arnold,et al.  Kooperatives Lernen im Internet: qualitative Analyse einer Community of Practice im Fernstudium , 2003 .

[12]  J. Lave,et al.  Understanding Practice: Perspectives on Activity and Context , 1996 .

[13]  J. Lave.  Understanding practice: The practice of learning , 1993 .

[14]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[15]  Rena M. Palloff,et al.  Building Learning Communities in Cyberspace: Effective Strategies for the Online Classroom. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. , 1999 .

[16]  Martin G. Helander,et al.  The invisible computer: Why good products can fail, the personal computer is so complex, and information appliances are the solution , 1999 .

[17]  Gerhard Fischer.  Beyond Couch Potatoes , 2002 .

[18]  Paul Hildreth,et al.  Communities of Practice: Going Virtual , 2001, ArXiv.

[19]  H. Maturana,et al.  The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding , 2007 .

[20]  David A. Wiley,et al.  Online Self-Organizing Social Systems: The Decentralized Future of Online Learning , 2002 .

[21]  Mine Karatas-Ozkan,et al.  Changing Conversations in Organizations: A Complexity Approach to Change , 2004 .

[22]  Paul Duguid,et al.  Universities in the Digital Age , 1996 .

[23]  J. Cross.  Building Learning Communities in Cyberspace , 2004 .

[24]  Marko Čupić,et al.  Online communities – Designing Usability, Supporting Sociability , 2003 .

[25]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[26]  Jenny Preece,et al.  Online Communities: Designing Usability and Supporting Sociability , 2000 .

[27]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  The invisible computer , 1998 .

[28]  Gerhard Fischer,et al.  Beyond "Couch Potatoes": From Consumers to Designers and Active Contributors , 2002, First Monday.

[29]  R. McDermott.  Understanding practice: The acquisition of a child by a learning disability , 1993 .

[30]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[31]  Andrea Back.  Kooperatives Lernen im Internet , 1999 .

[32]  S. R. Hiltz.  Online communities , 1983 .

[33]  John D. Smith,et al.  E-Feedback to Reflect Legitimate Peripheral Participation: Towards a Redefinition of Feedback in Online Learning Environments. , 2002 .

[34]  Daniel V. Eastmond.  E-Moderating: The Key to Teaching and Learning Online , 2003 .

[35]  P. Kollock,et al.  Communities in Cyberspace , 2002 .

[36]  Feng Li,et al.  Effective Virtual Teams through Communities of Practice , 2000 .

[37]  Katerine Bielaczyc,et al.  Learning communities in classrooms: A reconceptualization of educational practice , 1999 .

[38]  Noriko Hara,et al.  Students’ Distress with a Web-based Distance Education Course: An Ethnographic Study of Participants' Experiences , 2003 .

[39]  P. Kollock.  The Economies of Online Cooperation: Gifts and Public Goods in Cyberspace , 1999 .

[40]  Patricia Arnold,et al.  Communities of Practice: guidelines for the design of online seminars in higher education , 2001 .

[41]  J. Walther.  Computer-Mediated Communication , 1996 .

[42]  Amy Jo Kim,et al.  Community Building on the Web: Secret Strategies for Successful Online Communities , 2000 .