A group sequential test for ABR detection

Abstract Objective: To detect the auditory brainstem response (ABR) automatically using an innovative sequentially applied Hotelling’s T 2 test, with the overall goal of optimising test time whilst controlling the false-positive rate (FPR). Design: The stage-wise critical decision boundaries for accepting or rejecting the null hypothesis were found using a new approach called the Convolutional Group Sequential Test (CGST). Specificity, sensitivity, and test time were evaluated using simulations and subject recorded data. Study sample: Data consists of click-evoked ABR threshold series from 12 normal hearing adults, and recordings of EEG background activity from 17 normal hearing adults. Results: Reductions in mean test time of up to 40–45% were observed for the sequential test, relative to a conventional “single shot” test where the statistical test is applied to the data just once. To obtain these results, it will occasionally be necessary to run the test to a higher number of stimuli, i.e. the maximum test time needs to be increased. Conclusions: The CGST can be used to control the specificity of a sequentially applied ABR detection method. Doing so can reduce test time, relative to the “single shot” test, when considered across a cohort of test subjects.

[1]  H. Hotelling The Generalization of Student’s Ratio , 1931 .

[2]  W. Pritchard,et al.  The brain in fractal time: 1/f-like power spectrum scaling of the human electroencephalogram. , 1992, The International journal of neuroscience.

[3]  H. Schäfer,et al.  Adaptive Group Sequential Designs for Clinical Trials: Combining the Advantages of Adaptive and of Classical Group Sequential Approaches , 2001, Biometrics.

[4]  Peihua Qiu,et al.  p-Value calculation for multi-stage additive tests , 2007 .

[5]  E. Smith Methods of Multivariate Analysis , 1997 .

[6]  G. Chi,et al.  On Sample Size and Inference for Two‐Stage Adaptive Designs , 2001, Biometrics.

[7]  P. Bauer,et al.  Evaluation of experiments with adaptive interim analyses. , 1994, Biometrics.

[8]  David Martin Simpson,et al.  The Convolutional Group Sequential Test: Reducing Test Time for Evoked Potentials , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  Mario Cebulla,et al.  Automated auditory response detection: Further improvement of the statistical test strategy by using progressive test steps of iteration , 2015, International journal of audiology.

[10]  W. Lehmacher,et al.  Adaptive Sample Size Calculations in Group Sequential Trials , 1999, Biometrics.

[11]  W. Brannath,et al.  Recursive Combination Tests , 2002 .

[12]  Y. B. Shi,et al.  New techniques of hearing assessment. , 1994, Otolaryngologic clinics of North America.

[13]  R. Fisher,et al.  Statistical Methods for Research Workers , 1930, Nature.

[14]  Mario Cebulla,et al.  Automated auditory response detection: Statistical problems with repeated testing Evaluación repetida en la detección de respuestas auditivas , 2005, International journal of audiology.

[15]  T. Ching,et al.  Language and speech outcomes of children with hearing loss and additional disabilities: identifying the variables that influence performance at five years of age , 2018, International journal of audiology.

[16]  P. Welch The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms , 1967 .

[17]  Jing Lv,et al.  Objective detection of evoked potentials using a bootstrap technique. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.

[18]  David Parker,et al.  Auditory brainstem response threshold estimation: subjective threshold estimation by experienced clinicians in a computer simulation of the clinical test , 2004, International journal of audiology.

[19]  Ramon C. Littell,et al.  Asymptotic Optimality of Fisher's Method of Combining Independent Tests , 1971 .

[20]  D. Simpson,et al.  Objective measures for detecting the auditory brainstem response: comparisons of specificity, sensitivity and detection time , 2018, International journal of audiology.

[21]  S. Arnold Objective versus Visual Detection of the Auditory Brain Stem Response , 1985, Ear and hearing.

[22]  C Elberling,et al.  Quality estimation of averaged auditory brainstem responses. , 1984, Scandinavian audiology.

[23]  Connie M. Borror,et al.  Methods of Multivariate Analysis, 2nd Ed. , 2004 .

[24]  Guido Knapp,et al.  A New Class of Completely Self-Designing Clinical Trials† , 2003 .

[25]  W. M. Carey,et al.  Digital spectral analysis: with applications , 1986 .

[26]  Mark Chang,et al.  Adaptive design method based on sum of p‐values , 2007, Statistics in medicine.

[27]  P. Armitage,et al.  Repeated Significance Tests on Accumulating Data , 1969 .

[28]  Mario Cebulla,et al.  Automated auditory response detection: Improvement of the statistical test strategy , 2013, International journal of audiology.

[29]  M A Proschan,et al.  Designed extension of studies based on conditional power. , 1995, Biometrics.