Inspired by Asian rice-paddy and Firefighter spiraling steps staircase, we employ a nano-manipulator augmented with CAD as a nano-robot water-buffalo, promised to improve by an order of the magnitude the pioneer work of GE Solar voltaic cell (SVC) made of one Carbon NanoTube (CNT) enjoyed QECNT~5%. Our CNT was made of the semiconductor at NIR wavelength EBG= 1.107 eV which can absorb any photon whose wavelength λ ≤ λNIR =1.11 μm. This EBG is chosen due to the cutoff of Pb-Crown glass which happened put us in the equal amount of solar energy spectrum as silicon p-n junction SVC. Nevertheless, the exceeding of the Shockley and Queisser efficiency limit 30% might be due to the fact that we have much compact one-dimensional building block CNT of a tiny diameter 0.66 nm. It allows us to construct 3D structure, called volume pixel, "voxel," in a much efficient spiraling steps staircase fashion to capture the solar spectral energy spreading naturally by a simple focusing lens without occlusion. For real-estate premium applications, in Space or Ocean, we designed a volume pixel (Voxel) housing a stack of 16 CNTs steps spiraling 22° each like the fire house staircase occupying the height of 16 x dCNT =16 x 0.66nm= 10.56 nm and covering over 360°. The total SVC had the size 2x2 meter2, consisting of 100×100 lenslet array. Each lens was made of Pb-Crown glass which was inexpensive simple spherical lens having the diameter of Dlens=2 cm and F#=0.7. It can focus the sunlight a millionth times stronger in a smallest possible focal spot size, λYellow=0.635 μm< λMax photons <λRed=0.73 μm, where the largest number of solar photons, 68%, according to the Plank radiation spectrum at 6000°K and the Lord Rayleigh diffraction limit. The solar panel seals individually such an array of 3D cavities of SVC enjoying theoretically from the UV 12% (wasted in passing through) visible 68% to the infrared 20% at a total of 16x5%~80% total QECNT per cell. The solar panel is made of light-weight carbon composite tolerating about 20% inactive fill factor and 10% dead pixels.
[1]
Harold Szu,et al.
Designs of solar voltaic cells based on carbon nano-tubes
,
2006,
SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.
[2]
J. Nelson.
The physics of solar cells
,
2003
.
[3]
Arun Majumdar,et al.
Design of Nanostructured Heterojunction Polymer Photovoltaic Devices
,
2003
.
[4]
G. P. Srivastava,et al.
Efficiency of Schottky barrier solar cells
,
1980
.
[5]
H. Urey.
Spot size, depth-of-focus, and diffraction ring intensity formulas for truncated Gaussian beams.
,
2004,
Applied optics.
[6]
William I. Milne,et al.
Carbon nanotube Schottky diode and directionally dependent field-effect transistor using asymmetrical contacts
,
2005
.
[7]
A. Rinzler,et al.
Electronic structure of atomically resolved carbon nanotubes
,
1998,
Nature.
[8]
N. K. Swami,et al.
The role of the interfacial layer in Schottky barrier solar cells
,
1979
.
[9]
J. U. Lee,et al.
Photovoltaic effect in ideal carbon nanotube diodes
,
2005
.
[10]
E. Li,et al.
Carbon nanotube Schottky diode: an atomic perspective
,
2008,
Nanotechnology.
[11]
François Léonard,et al.
Energy conversion efficiency in nanotube optoelectronics.
,
2005,
Nano letters.
[12]
Enge Wang,et al.
Efficient Visible Photoluminescence from Carbon Nanotubes in Zeolite Templates
,
2004
.
[13]
T. Ebbesen.
Physical Properties of Carbon Nanotubes
,
1997
.
[14]
H. Queisser,et al.
Detailed Balance Limit of Efficiency of p‐n Junction Solar Cells
,
1961
.