Experience-dependent Hemispheric Specialization of Letters and Numbers Is Revealed in Early Visual Processing

Recent fMRI research has demonstrated that letters and numbers are preferentially processed in distinct regions and hemispheres in the visual cortex. In particular, the left visual cortex preferentially processes letters compared with numbers, whereas the right visual cortex preferentially processes numbers compared with letters. Because letters and numbers are cultural inventions and are otherwise physically arbitrary, such a double dissociation is strong evidence for experiential effects on neural architecture. Here, we use the high temporal resolution of ERPs to investigate the temporal dynamics of the neural dissociation between letters and numbers. We show that the divergence between ERP traces to letters and numbers emerges very early in processing. Letters evoked greater N1 waves (latencies 140–170 msec) than did numbers over left occipital channels, whereas numbers evoked greater N1s than letters over the right, suggesting letters and numbers are preferentially processed in opposite hemispheres early in visual encoding. Moreover, strings of letters, but not single letters, elicited greater P2 ERP waves (starting around 250 msec) than numbers did over the left hemisphere, suggesting that the visual cortex is tuned to selectively process combinations of letters, but not numbers, further along in the visual processing stream. Additionally, the processing of both of these culturally defined stimulus types differentiated from similar but unfamiliar visual stimulus forms (false fonts) even earlier in the processing stream (the P1 at 100 msec). These findings imply major cortical specialization processes within the visual system driven by experience with reading and mathematics.

[1]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  The time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data , 2006, NeuroImage.

[2]  Grégory Simon,et al.  CHRONOMETRY OF VISUAL WORD RECOGNITION DURING PASSIVE AND LEXICAL DECISION TASKS: AN ERP INVESTIGATION , 2004, The International journal of neuroscience.

[3]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Cultural Recycling of Cortical Maps , 2007, Neuron.

[4]  Joseph Dien,et al.  Issues in the application of the average reference: Review, critiques, and recommendations , 1998 .

[5]  Thad A Polk,et al.  Category-level contributions to the alphanumeric category effect in visual search , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  M. Posner,et al.  Establishing a time‐line of word recognition: evidence from eye movements and event‐related potentials , 1998, Neuroreport.

[7]  Bruce D. McCandliss,et al.  Fast, visual specialization for reading in English revealed by the topography of the N170 ERP response , 2005, Behavioral and Brain Functions.

[8]  T. Givón,et al.  Brain Plasticity in Learning Visual Words , 1997, Cognitive Psychology.

[9]  Thad A. Polk,et al.  Neural Dissociation of Number from Letter Recognition and Its Relationship to Parietal Numerical Processing , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  M. Sigman,et al.  Opinion TRENDS in Cognitive Sciences Vol.9 No.7 July 2005 The neural code for written words: a proposal , 2022 .

[11]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[12]  Daniel Brandeis,et al.  Evidence for developmental changes in the visual word processing network beyond adolescence , 2006, NeuroImage.

[13]  J L Lancaster,et al.  The temporal dynamics of the effects in occipital cortex of visual-spatial selective attention. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[14]  J. Jonides,et al.  A conceptual category effect in visual search: O as letter or as digit , 1972 .

[15]  Daniel Brandeis,et al.  Neurophysiological signs of rapidly emerging visual expertise for symbol strings , 2005, Neuroreport.

[16]  S. Dehaene,et al.  How Learning to Read Changes the Cortical Networks for Vision and Language , 2010, Science.

[17]  Leeyoung Park Correction: Linkage Disequilibrium Decay and Past Population History in the Human Genome , 2012, PLoS ONE.

[18]  T A Polk,et al.  The neural development and organization of letter recognition: evidence from functional neuroimaging, computational modeling, and behavioral studies. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Early lateralization and orientation tuning for face, word, and object processing in the visual cortex , 2003, NeuroImage.

[21]  Alessandro Angrilli,et al.  Influence of Phonological, Semantic and Orthographic tasks on the early linguistic components N150 and N350. , 2007, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[22]  M. Farah,et al.  Neural Specialization for Letter Recognition , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  Dietrich Lehmann,et al.  Spatial analysis of evoked potentials in man—a review , 1984, Progress in Neurobiology.

[24]  T. Allison,et al.  Human extrastriate visual cortex and the perception of faces, words, numbers, and colors. , 1994, Cerebral cortex.

[25]  J. Pernier,et al.  ERP Manifestations of Processing Printed Words at Different Psycholinguistic Levels: Time Course and Scalp Distribution , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[26]  S. Jay Samuels,et al.  Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading , 1974 .

[27]  Joseph Dien,et al.  The neurocognitive basis of reading single words as seen through early latency ERPs: A model of converging pathways , 2009, Biological Psychology.

[28]  J. Démonet,et al.  Cortical areas involved in Arabic number reading , 2008, Neurology.

[29]  Courtney Stevens,et al.  Relative laterality of the N170 to single letter stimuli is predicted by a concurrent neural index of implicit processing of letternames , 2013, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  S Dehaene,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for category-specific word processing in the normal human brain. , 1995, Neuroreport.

[31]  Bruce D. McCandliss,et al.  The visual word form area: expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[32]  Shachar Maidenbaum,et al.  A number-form area in the blind , 2015, Nature Communications.

[33]  Denise C. Park,et al.  Investigating Unique Environmental Contributions to the Neural Representation of Written Words: A Monozygotic Twin Study , 2012, PloS one.

[34]  O. Hauk,et al.  Neurophysiological distinction of action words in the fronto‐central cortex , 2004, Human brain mapping.

[35]  Mariano Sigman,et al.  Hierarchical Coding of Letter Strings in the Ventral Stream: Dissecting the Inner Organization of the Visual Word-Form System , 2007, Neuron.

[36]  Bruce D. McCandliss,et al.  Development of neural systems for reading. , 2007, Annual review of neuroscience.

[37]  Rolf Verleger,et al.  Consciousness wanted, attention found: Reasons for the advantage of the left visual field in identifying T2 among rapidly presented series , 2015, Consciousness and Cognition.

[38]  M. Kutas,et al.  Neurophysiological evidence for visual perceptual categorization of words and faces within 150 ms. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[39]  M. Kiefer,et al.  Cognitive Neuroscience: Tracking the time course of object categorization using event-related potentials , 1999 .

[40]  Alessandro Angrilli,et al.  Mass and Count nouns activate different brain regions: An ERP study on early components , 2008, Neuroscience Letters.

[41]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  Letter processing in the visual system: Different activation patterns for single letters and strings , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[42]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  An early electrophysiological response associated with expertise in letter perception , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[43]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  The Organization of Brain Activations in Number Comparison: Event-Related Potentials and the Additive-Factors Method , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[44]  Jonathan Winawer,et al.  A Brain Area for Visual Numerals , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[45]  T A Polk,et al.  Brain localization for arbitrary stimulus categories: a simple account based on Hebbian learning. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  R. Oostenveld,et al.  Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[47]  Marty G. Woldorff,et al.  The Temporal Dynamics of Implicit Processing of Non-Letter, Letter, and Word-Forms in the Human Visual Cortex , 2009, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[48]  R. Salmelin,et al.  Dynamics of letter string perception in the human occipitotemporal cortex. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[49]  S. Dehaene Varieties of numerical abilities , 1992, Cognition.

[50]  C. Pernet,et al.  Neural timing of visual implicit categorization. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[51]  O Bertrand,et al.  A theoretical justification of the average reference in topographic evoked potential studies. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.