In vivo Performance Evaluation of Implantable Wireless Neural Signal Transmission System for Brain Machine Interface

A brain-machine interface (BMI) has recently been introduced to research a reliable control of machine from the brain information processing through single neural spikes in motor brain areas for paralyzed individuals. Small, wireless, and implantable BMI system should be developed to decode movement information for classifications of neural activities in the brain. In this paper, we have developed a totally implantable wireless neural signal transmission system (TiWiNets) combined with advanced digital signal processing capable of implementing a high performance BMI system. It consisted of a preamplifier with only 2 operational amplifiers (op-amps) for each channel, wireless bluetooth module (BM), a Labview-based monitor program, and 16 bit-RISC microcontroller. Digital finite impulse response (FIR) band-pass filter based on windowed sinc method was designed to transmit neural signals corresponding to the frequency range of 400 Hz to 1.5 kHz via wireless BM, measuring over −48 dB attenuated in the other frequencies. Less than ±2% error by inputting a sine wave at pass-band frequencies for FIR algorithm test was obtained between simulated and measured FIR results. Because of the powerful digital FIR design, the total dimension could be dramatically reduced to 23×27×4 mm including wireless BM except for battery. The power isolation was built to avoid the effect of radio-frequency interference on the system as well as to protect brain cells from system damage due to excessive power dissipation or external electric leakage. In vivo performance was evaluated in terms of long-term stability and FIR algorithm for 4 months after implantation. Four TiWiNets were implanted into experimental animals’ brains, and single neural signals were recorded and analyzed in real time successfully except for one due to siliconcoated problem. They could control remote target machine by classify neural spike trains based on decoding technology. Thus, we concluded that our study could fulfill in vivo needs to study various single neuron-movement relationships in diverse fields of BMI.

[1]  Jonathan R Wolpaw,et al.  Control of a two-dimensional movement signal by a noninvasive brain-computer interface in humans. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  Miguel A. L. Nicolelis,et al.  Actions from thoughts , 2001, Nature.

[3]  S. Meagher.  Instant neural control of a movement signal , 2002 .

[4]  David M. Santucci,et al.  Learning to Control a Brain–Machine Interface for Reaching and Grasping by Primates , 2003, PLoS biology.

[5]  Hyung-Cheul Shin,et al.  Development of intracranial brain-computer interface system using non-motor brain area for series of motor functions , 2006 .

[6]  J. Chapin.  Using multi-neuron population recordings for neural prosthetics , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[7]  R. Andersen,et al.  Change in motor plan, without a change in the spatial locus of attention, modulates activity in posterior parietal cortex. , 1998, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Dawn M. Taylor,et al.  Direct Cortical Control of 3D Neuroprosthetic Devices , 2002, Science.

[9]  D J McFarland,et al.  An EEG-based brain-computer interface for cursor control. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  Gert Pfurtscheller,et al.  Brain-computer interface: a new communication device for handicapped persons , 1993 .

[11]  John K. Chapin,et al.  Neural prostheses for restoration of sensory and motor function , 2000 .

[12]  Mirjana B Popović,et al.  Control of neural prostheses for grasping and reaching. , 2003, Medical engineering & physics.

[13]  Jon A. Mukand,et al.  Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia , 2006, Nature.

[14]  Miguel A. L. Nicolelis,et al.  Designing a Brain-Machine Interface for Neuroprosthetic Control , 2000 .

[15]  Tom Carey,et al.  ACM SIGCHI Curricula for Human-Computer Interaction , 1992 .

[16]  Dennis J. McFarland,et al.  Brain–computer interfaces for communication and control , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[17]  Miguel A. L. Nicolelis,et al.  Real-time control of a robot arm using simultaneously recorded neurons in the motor cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  Jerald D. Kralik,et al.  Real-time prediction of hand trajectory by ensembles of cortical neurons in primates , 2000, Nature.

[19]  J K Chapin,et al.  Neural prosthetic devices for quadriplegia , 2000, Current opinion in neurology.

[20]  Patrick D Wolf,et al.  A low power multichannel analog front end for portable neural signal recordings , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[21]  Hyung-Cheul Shin,et al.  Development of neuronal signal mapping method for 2D encoding-based brain-computer interface system , 2007 .

[22]  R. Andersen,et al.  Coding of intention in the posterior parietal cortex , 1997, Nature.

[23]  Klaus-Robert Müller,et al.  The non-invasive Berlin Brain–Computer Interface: Fast acquisition of effective performance in untrained subjects , 2007, NeuroImage.