Predictability sieve, pointer states, and the classicality of quantum trajectories (10 pages)

We study various measures of classicality of the states of open quantum systems subject to decoherence. Classical states are expected to be stable in spite of decoherence, and are thought to leave conspicuous imprints on the environment. Here these expected features of environment-induced superselection are quantified using four different criteria: predictability sieve (which selects states that produce least entropy), purification time (which looks for states that are the easiest to find out from the imprint they leave on the environment), efficiency threshold (which finds states that can be deduced from measurements on a smallest fraction of the environment), and purity loss time (that looks for states for which it takes the longest to lose a set fraction of their initial purity). We show that when pointer states\char22{}the most predictable states of an open quantum system selected by the predictability sieve\char22{}are well defined, all four criteria agree that they are indeed the most classical states. We illustrate this with two examples: an underdamped harmonic oscillator, for which coherent states are unanimously chosen by all criteria, and a free particle undergoing quantum Brownian motion, for which most criteria select almost identical Gaussian states (although, in this case, the predictability sieve does not select well defined pointer states).

[1]  Erkki J. Brändas,et al.  Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory : E. Joos, H. D. Zeh, C. Kiefer, D. Giulini, J. Kupsch and I.-O Stamatescu, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2003 , 2004 .

[2]  Gardiner,et al.  Wave-function quantum stochastic differential equations and quantum-jump simulation methods. , 1992, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[3]  H. Carmichael.  An open systems approach to quantum optics , 1993 .

[4]  W. Zurek.  Decoherence, einselection, and the quantum origins of the classical , 2001, quant-ph/0105127.

[5]  L. Diósi.  On High-Temperature Markovian Equation for Quantum Brownian Motion , 1993 .

[6]  Maximally robust unravelings of quantum master equations , 1997, quant-ph/9709014.

[7]  Emergence of classicality via decoherence described by Lindblad operators. , 1995, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[8]  Vitali,et al.  Effect of feedback on the decoherence of a Schrödinger-cat state: A quantum trajectory description. , 1996, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[9]  Habib,et al.  Coherent states via decoherence. , 1993, Physical review letters.

[10]  Bhattacharya,et al.  Continuous quantum measurement and the emergence of classical chaos , 2000, Physical review letters.

[11]  Milburn,et al.  Interpretation of quantum jump and diffusion processes illustrated on the Bloch sphere. , 1993, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[12]  Decoherence of quantum fields: Pointer states and predictability. , 1995, Physical review. D, Particles and fields.

[13]  N. Gisin,et al.  The quantum-state diffusion model applied to open systems , 1992 .

[14]  Quantum state diffusion, localization and computation , 1995, quant-ph/9506039.

[15]  V. P. Belavkin,et al.  Measurements continuous in time and a posteriori states in quantum mechanics , 1991 .

[16]  W. H. Zurek,et al.  Einselection and decoherence from an information theory perspective , 2000, Annalen der Physik.

[17]  Robust unravelings for resonance fluorescence , 2000, quant-ph/0002064.

[18]  Shapiro,et al.  Decoherence produces coherent states: An explicit proof for harmonic chains. , 1994, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[19]  D. J. Atkins,et al.  Classical Robustness of Quantum Unravellings , 2005 .

[20]  Schrödinger cat states and single runs for the damped harmonic oscillator. , 1994, Physical review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics.

[21]  Atom lasers, coherent states, and coherence: II. Maximally robust ensembles of pure states. , 2001, quant-ph/0112145.

[22]  K. Mølmer,et al.  Wave-function approach to dissipative processes in quantum optics. , 1992, Physical review letters.

[23]  W. Zurek.  Pointer Basis of Quantum Apparatus: Into What Mixture Does the Wave Packet Collapse? , 1981 .

[24]  Paolo Tombesi,et al.  Non-Markovian quantum feedback from homodyne measurements: The effect of a nonzero feedback delay time , 1999 .

[25]  W. Zurek.  Environment-induced superselection rules , 1982 .

[26]  I. Stamatescu,et al.  Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory , 1996 .

[27]  L. Diosi,et al.  Complete parameterization, and invariance, of diffusive quantum trajectories for Markovian open systems , 2001 .

[28]  Wojciech H. Zurek,et al.  Conditional quantum dynamics with several observers , 2004 .

[29]  David Poulin,et al.  Objective properties from subjective quantum states: environment as a witness. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[30]  D A Dalvit,et al.  Unconditional pointer states from conditional master equations. , 2001, Physical review letters.