Analysis of Stopping Behavior at Urban Signalized Intersections

Traffic accidents at signalized intersections are influenced by many environmental factors, including site layout, traffic volume, and signal operation. However, most traffic accidents are attributable to driver behavior in response to the environment, because responses to the environment vary with drivers’ individual characteristics, as observed in the concept of a dilemma zone (DZ) at intersection approaches. For DZ protection, the installation of traffic signals closer to the stop line (i.e., before the intersection) has been proposed in South Korea. Although such proposals have been implemented experimentally, the actual effect of this measure on driver behavior has not yet been investigated. A discrete choice model is used to identify the factors that influence drivers’ crossing and stopping behaviors at signalized intersections, under the assumption that traffic safety is at risk if the influence of the signal location is ignored. Two analyses are presented to assess the impact of signal location on driver behavior at intersections. Violations of stop line crossing behavior and remaining time to stop line are examined, and two types of driver behavior models are presented that address the effects of signal location and other factors. The results consistently reveal that traffic signal location affects drivers’ stopping behavior, suggesting that traffic signal location can jeopardize road safety and therefore should be considered in intersection design.

[1]  Panagiotis Papaioannou,et al.  A Study of Traffic Signal Violations at Highway Intersections , 1997 .

[2]  Frank S. Koppelman,et al.  Modeling the Choice to Use Toll and High-Occupancy Vehicle Facilities , 2003 .

[3]  Kenneth Wade Ogden,et al.  Safer Roads: A Guide to Road Safety Engineering , 1995 .

[4]  Partha Chakroborty,et al.  MODELING OF DRIVER ANXIETY DURING SIGNAL CHANGE INTERVALS , 1993 .

[5]  T. Salthouse,et al.  Effects of aging on perceptual closure. , 1988, The American journal of psychology.

[6]  法律 Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices , 2010 .

[7]  Yosef Sheffi,et al.  A Model of Driver Behavior at High Speed Signalized Intersections , 1981 .

[8]  P T Martin,et al.  EVALUATION OF ADVANCE WARNING SIGNALS ON HIGH SPEED SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS , 2003 .

[9]  J. Caird,et al.  The effect of yellow light onset time on older and younger drivers' perception response time (PRT) and intersection behavior , 2007 .

[10]  Frank S. Koppelman,et al.  A model of joint activity participation between household members , 2002 .

[11]  H Köll,et al.  Driver behaviour during flashing green before amber: a comparative study. , 2004, Accident Analysis and Prevention.

[12]  Chandra R. Bhat,et al.  Disaggregate Attraction-End Choice Modeling: Formulation and Empirical Analysis , 1998 .

[13]  Fred Coleman,et al.  Dynamic dilemma zone based on driver behavior and car-following model at highway-rail intersections , 2003 .

[14]  Ronald Pfefer,et al.  GUIDANCE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE AASHTO STRATEGIC HIGHWAY SAFETY PLAN. VOLUME 1: A GUIDE FOR ADDRESSING AGGRESSIVE-DRIVING COLLISIONS , 2003 .

[15]  Panagiotis Papaioannou,et al.  Driver behaviour, dilemma zone and safety effects at urban signalized intersections in Greece. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  Myung-Soon Chang,et al.  TIMING TRAFFIC SIGNAL CHANGE INTERVALS BASED ON DRIVER BEHAVIOR , 1985 .

[17]  Robert Herman,et al.  The Problem of the Amber Signal Light in Traffic Flow , 1960 .

[18]  P T McCoy,et al.  Dilemma zone protection with advance detection and active warning signs , 2002 .

[19]  Renatus N. Mussa,et al.  Simulator Evaluation of Green and Flashing Amber Signal Phasing , 1996 .

[20]  J. P. Gliebe,et al.  A model of joint activity participation , 2000 .

[21]  P L Olson,et al.  Perception-Response Time to Unexpected Roadway Hazards , 1986, Human factors.

[22]  David Mahalel,et al.  Safety evaluation of a flashing-green light in a traffic signal , 1985 .

[23]  D. Shinar,et al.  Effects of uncertainty, transmission type, driver age and gender on brake reaction and movement time. , 2002, Journal of safety research.

[24]  G. Johansson,et al.  Drivers' Brake Reaction Times , 1971, Human factors.

[25]  Natasha Merat,et al.  Comparing the driving performance of average and older drivers: The effect of surrogate in-vehicle information systems , 2005 .