Carbon free energy development and the role of small modular reactors: A review and decision framework for deployment in developing countries

Global energy demand is projected to continue to grow over the next two decades, especially in developing economies. An emerging energy technology with distinct advantages for growing economies is small modular nuclear reactors (SMRs). Their smaller size makes them suitable for areas with limited grid capacities and dispersed populations while enabling flexibility in generating capacity and fuel sources. They have the ability to pair well with renewable energy sources, the major source of increased energy capacity for many developing economies. Further advantages include their passive safety features, lower capital requirements, and reduced construction times. As a result, SMRs have potential for overcoming energy poverty issues for growing economies without increasing carbon emissions.

[1]  Giorgio Locatelli,et al.  Financial Case Studies on Small- and Medium-Size Modular Reactors , 2012 .

[2]  Giorgio Locatelli,et al.  Economic features of integral, modular, small-to-medium size reactors , 2010 .

[3]  Humberto E. Garcia,et al.  Dynamic analysis of hybrid energy systems under flexible operation and variable renewable generation – Part I: Dynamic performance analysis , 2013 .

[4]  David J. Blackwood,et al.  Selection of MCA methods to support decision making for renewable energy developments , 2013 .

[5]  Anthony C. Krautmann,et al.  Economies of Scale in Nuclear Power Generation , 1988 .

[6]  Sonstiges Corruption Perceptions Index , 2011 .

[7]  Muhammad Shahbaz,et al.  What role of renewable and non-renewable electricity consumption and output is needed to initially mitigate CO2 emissions in MENA region? , 2014 .

[8]  Aie Energy Statistics of Non-OECD Countries 2012 , 2012 .

[9]  Holger Ludwig Power Load cycling capabilities of German Nuclear Power Plants ( NPP ) , 2011 .

[10]  Aie,et al.  World Energy Outlook 2013 , 2013 .

[11]  David Shropshire,et al.  Economic viability of small nuclear reactors in future European cogeneration markets , 2012 .

[12]  Fenguangzhai Song CD , 1992 .

[13]  Jiangjiang Wang,et al.  Review on multi-criteria decision analysis aid in sustainable energy decision-making , 2009 .

[14]  Aie Energy Balances of non-OECD Countries 2012 , 2012 .

[15]  Taehoon Hong,et al.  Analysis of South Korea’s economic growth, carbon dioxide emission, and energy consumption using the Markov switching model , 2013 .

[16]  Klaus Lackner,et al.  Small Modular Infrastructure , 2013 .

[17]  Fatih Aydogan Quantitative and Qualitative Comparison of Light Water and Advanced Small Modular Reactors (SMRs) , 2014 .

[18]  Robert Rosner,et al.  Small Modular Reactors – Key to Future Nuclear Power Generation in the U.S , 2011 .

[19]  George Halkos,et al.  The effect of electricity consumption from renewable sources on countries׳ economic growth levels: Evidence from advanced, emerging and developing economies , 2014 .

[20]  Julia C. Terrapon-Pfaff,et al.  A cross-sectional review: Impacts and sustainability of small-scale renewable energy projects in developing countries , 2014 .

[21]  Mads Troldborg,et al.  Greenhouse gas emissions from renewable energy sources: A review of lifecycle considerations , 2014 .

[22]  Gento Mogi,et al.  A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP)/data envelopment analysis (DEA) hybrid model for efficiently allocating energy R&D resources: In the case of energy technologies against high oil prices , 2013 .

[23]  Larry Carter,et al.  Economic and Employment Impacts of Small Modular Nuclear Reactors , 2010 .

[24]  Eric W. Stein,et al.  A comprehensive multi-criteria model to rank electric energy production technologies , 2013 .

[25]  J. Gibbins,et al.  Carbon Capture and Storage , 2008 .

[26]  T. Saaty Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2005 .

[27]  Jin-Soo Kim,et al.  Analysis of the assessment factors for renewable energy dissemination program evaluation using fuzzy AHP , 2010 .

[28]  Daniel T Ingersoll,et al.  Deliberately Small Reactors and the Second Nuclear Era , 2009 .

[29]  Sara Boarin,et al.  An Evaluation of SMR Economic Attractiveness , 2014 .

[30]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1990 .

[31]  Miracle Chibuike THE INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY (IAEA), NUCLEAR WEAPONS PROLIFERATION AND INTERNATIONAL SECURITY, 1957-2010. , 2013 .

[32]  A. Lokhov,et al.  Load-following with nuclear power plants by , 2011 .

[33]  Toshio Konishi,et al.  Nuclear desalination: a viable option for producing freshwater** , 2003 .

[34]  W. Pedrycz,et al.  A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory , 1983 .

[35]  Robert P. Breckenridge,et al.  Preliminary Feasibility of Value-Added Products from Cogeneration and Hybrid Energy Systems in Wyoming , 2012 .

[36]  Dalia Patiño-Echeverri,et al.  Fuel prices, emission standards, and generation costs for coal vs natural gas power plants. , 2013, Environmental science & technology.

[37]  W. Greene,et al.  Economies of Scale in U.S. Electric Power Generation , 1976, Journal of Political Economy.