Directional instability of microtubule transport in the presence of kinesin and dynein, two opposite polarity motor proteins

Kinesin and dynein are motor proteins that move in opposite directions along microtubules. In this study, we examine the consequences of having kinesin and dynein (ciliary outer arm or cytoplasmic) bound to glass surfaces interacting with the same microtubule in vitro. Although one might expect a balance of opposing forces to produce little or no net movement, we find instead that microtubules move unidirectionally for several microns (corresponding to hundreds of ATPase cycles by a motor) but continually switch between kinesin-directed and dynein- directed transport. The velocities in the plus-end (0.2-0.3 microns/s) and minus-end (3.5-4 microns/s) directions were approximately half those produced by kinesin (0.5 microns/s) and ciliary dynein (6.7 microns/s) alone, indicating that the motors not contributing to movement can interact with and impose a drag upon the microtubule. By comparing two dyneins with different duty ratios (percentage of time spent in a strongly bound state during the ATPase cycle) and varying the nucleotide conditions, we show that the microtubule attachment times of the two opposing motors as well as their relative numbers determine which motor predominates in this assay. Together, these findings are consistent with a model in which kinesin-induced movement of a microtubule induces a negative strain in attached dyneins which causes them to dissociate before entering a force-generating state (and vice versa); reversals in the direction of transport may require the temporary dissociation of the transporting motor from the microtubule. The bidirectional movements described here are also remarkably similar to the back-and-forth movements of chromosomes during mitosis and membrane vesicles in fibroblasts. These results suggest that the underlying mechanical properties of motor proteins, at least in part, may be responsible for reversals in microtubule-based transport observed in cells.

[1]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Functions of microtubule-based motors. , 1991, Annual review of physiology.

[2]  D. Hackney,et al.  Kinesin ATPase: rate-limiting ADP release. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  E. Salmon,et al.  Traction force on a kinetochore at metaphase acts as a linear function of kinetochore fiber length , 1982, The Journal of cell biology.

[4]  R. Neve,et al.  The primary structure and analysis of the squid kinesin heavy chain. , 1990, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[5]  R. Vale,et al.  Rotation and translocation of microtubules in vitro induced by dyneins from Tetrahymena cilia , 1988, Cell.

[6]  L. Rebhun.  Saltatory Particle Movements and Their Relation to the Mitotic Apparatus1 , 1963 .

[7]  Russell J. Stewart,et al.  The kinesin-like ncd protein of Drosophila is a minus end-directed microtubule motor , 1990, Cell.

[8]  E. Salmon,et al.  Oscillatory movements of monooriented chromosomes and their position relative to the spindle pole result from the ejection properties of the aster and half-spindle , 1986, The Journal of cell biology.

[9]  D. Albertini,et al.  A time-lapse video image intensification analysis of cytoplasmic organelle movements during endosome translocation , 1984, The Journal of cell biology.

[10]  A. Hyman,et al.  Microtubule-motor activity of a yeast centromere-binding protein complex , 1992, Nature.

[11]  A. Hyman,et al.  Two different microtubule-based motor activities with opposite polarities in kinetochores , 1991, Nature.

[12]  R. Vallee,et al.  Retrograde transport by the microtubule-associated protein MAP 1C , 1987, Nature.

[13]  R. Vallee,et al.  Motor proteins of cytoplasmic microtubules. , 1990, Annual review of biochemistry.

[14]  R. Vale,et al.  Microtubule translocation properties of intact and proteolytically digested dyneins from Tetrahymena cilia , 1989, The Journal of cell biology.

[15]  W. Sale,et al.  Direction of active sliding of microtubules in Tetrahymena cilia. , 1977, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  K. Sekimoto,et al.  Protein friction exerted by motor enzymes through a weak-binding interaction. , 1991, Journal of theoretical biology.

[17]  Edward D. Salmon,et al.  The Drosophila claret segregation protein is a minus-end directed motor molecule , 1990, Nature.

[18]  M. Kirschner,et al.  Dynamic instability of microtubule growth , 1984, Nature.

[19]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Localization of cytoplasmic dynein to mitotic spindles and kinetochores , 1990, Nature.

[20]  Michael P. Sheetz,et al.  Identification of a novel force-generating protein, kinesin, involved in microtubule-based motility , 1985, Cell.

[21]  Keiichi Takahashi,et al.  Direct measurement of the force of microtubule sliding in flagella , 1981, Nature.

[22]  B. Schaar,et al.  CENP-E is a putative kinetochore motor that accumulates just before mitosis , 1992, Nature.

[23]  Michael P. Sheetz,et al.  Different axoplasmic proteins generate movement in opposite directions along microtubules in vitro , 1985, Cell.

[24]  R. Vale,et al.  One-dimensional diffusion of microtubules bound to flagellar dynein , 1989, Cell.

[25]  A. Hyman,et al.  Preparation of marked microtubules for the assay of the polarity of microtubule-based motors by fluorescence , 1991, Journal of Cell Science.

[26]  R. Nuydens,et al.  Movements of intracellular particles in undifferentiated amebae of dictyostelium discoideum , 1987 .

[27]  L. Haimo,et al.  Bidirectional pigment granule movements of melanophores are regulated by protein phosphorylation and dephosphorylation , 1986, Cell.

[28]  K. A. Johnson.  Preparation and properties of dynein from Tetrahymena cilia. , 1986, Methods in enzymology.

[29]  T. Reese,et al.  Dynein is the motor for retrograde axonal transport of organelles. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  A. Hudspeth,et al.  Movement of microtubules by single kinesin molecules , 1989, Nature.

[31]  A. Huxley,et al.  A note suggesting that the cross-bridge attachment during muscle contraction may take place in two stages , 1973, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[32]  E. Salmon,et al.  Polarized microtubule gliding and particle saltations produced by soluble factors from sea urchin eggs and embryos. , 1986, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[33]  D. Weiss,et al.  Towards a new classification of intracellular particle movements based on quantitative analyses. , 1986, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[34]  A. Huxley.  Muscle structure and theories of contraction. , 1957, Progress in biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[35]  A. Hyman,et al.  Preparation of modified tubulins. , 1991, Methods in enzymology.

[36]  L. Goldstein,et al.  Bead movement by single kinesin molecules studied with optical tweezers , 1990, Nature.

[37]  R. D. Allen,et al.  Fast axonal transport in squid giant axon. , 1982, Science.

[38]  Olive Lloyd-Baker.  IDENTIFICATION OF NOVEL , 1964 .

[39]  Toshio Yanagida,et al.  Force measurements by micromanipulation of a single actin filament by glass needles , 1988, Nature.

[40]  J. McIntosh,et al.  Cytoplasmic dynein is localized to kinetochores during mitosis , 1990, Nature.

[41]  A. Bajer.  Functional autonomy of monopolar spindle and evidence for oscillatory movement in mitosis , 1982, The Journal of cell biology.

[42]  J. Spudich,et al.  Myosin movement in vitro: a quantitative assay using oriented actin cables from Nitella. , 1986, Methods in enzymology.