‘Near and Far’

For domiciled individuals, homeless people provide a disturbing reminder that all is not right with the world. Reactions to seeing homeless people frequently encompass repulsion, discomfort, sympathy and sometimes futility. This paper considers domiciled constructions of homeless people drawn from interviews with 16 participants recruited in the central business district of a New Zealand city. It documents how, when trying to make sense of this complex social problem, domiciled people draw on shared characterisations of homeless people. The concept of ‘social distance’ is used to interrogate the shifting and sometimes incongruous reactions evident in participant accounts. ‘Social distancing’ is conceptualised as a dynamic communal practice existing in interactions between human beings and reflected in the ways that domiciled people talk about their experiences with homeless individuals.

[1]  L. Lees,et al.  The Emancipatory City: paradoxes and possibilities , 2004 .

[2]  Bruce G. Link,et al.  Images of the homeless: Public views and media messages , 1991 .

[3]  Bruce G. Link,et al.  Revisiting the Contact Hypothesis: The Case of Public Exposure to Homelessness , 2004 .

[4]  Henri Lefebvre.  The production of space , 1992 .

[5]  D. Collins,et al.  Beyond Punitive Regulation? New Zealand Local Governments' Responses to Homelessness , 2007 .

[6]  J. Feagin,et al.  Beyond Black: Biracial Identity in America , 2001 .

[7]  Harry C. Triandis,et al.  A cross-cultural study of social distance. , 1962 .

[8]  The Binary City , 2001 .

[9]  C. Tompsett,et al.  Homelessness in the United States: Assessing Changes in Prevalence and Public Opinion, 1993–2001 , 2006, American journal of community psychology.

[10]  R. Williams,et al.  The reduction of intergroup tensions : a survey of research on problems of ethnic, racial, and religious group relations , 1948 .

[11]  Harvey Molotch,et al.  Talking City Trouble: Interactional Vandalism, Social Inequality, and the “Urban Interaction Problem”1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[12]  Michael Billig,et al.  Arguing and Thinking: A Rhetorical Approach to Social Psychology , 1987 .

[13]  S. Jovchelovitch.  Knowledge in context : representations, community and culture (author summary) , 2006 .

[14]  A. Radley,et al.  Television characterizations of homeless people in the United Kingdom , 2005 .

[15]  Lisa R. Schiff.  The power to define: Definitions as a site of struggle in the field of homelessness , 2003 .

[16]  John F. Galliher,et al.  Emory Bogardus and the Origins of the Social Distance Scale , 2007 .

[17]  G. Simmel.  The sociology of Georg Simmel , 1950 .

[18]  David Sibley,et al.  Geographies of Exclusion , 1995 .

[19]  D. Snow,et al.  The Cultural Patterning of Sympathy Toward the Homeless and Other Victims of Misfortune , 1996 .

[20]  K. Chamberlain,et al.  The mobile hermit and the city: considering links between places, objects, and identities in social psychological research on homelessness. , 2010, The British journal of social psychology.

[21]  Kevin Durrheim,et al.  Dislocating identity: Desegregation and the transformation of place , 2004 .

[22]  R. Frey,et al.  Beyond Left-Right Ideology in the Study of Justice Perception , 2005 .

[23]  K. Lewin.  SOME SOCIAL-PSYCHOLOGICAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE UNITED STATES AND GERMANY , 1936 .

[24]  Bruce G. Link,et al.  Public knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about homeless people: Evidence for compassion fatigue? , 1995, American journal of community psychology.

[25]  Jean Calterone Williams.  A Roof Over My Head: Homeless Women and the Shelter Industry , 2003 .

[26]  D. Mitchell.  The Right to the City: Social Justice and the Fight for Public Space , 2003 .

[27]  J. Forte.  Not in My Social World: A Cultural Analysis of Media Representations, Contested Spaces, and Sympathy for the Homeless , 2002, The Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare.

[28]  D. Levine,et al.  Simmel's Influence on American Sociology. I , 1976, American Journal of Sociology.

[29]  C. Leach,et al.  Exploring psychological mechanisms of collective action: does relevance of group identity influence how people cope with collective disadvantage? , 2008, The British journal of social psychology.

[30]  Darrin Hodgetts,et al.  Visualizing homelessness: a study in photography and estrangement , 2005 .

[31]  M. Verkuyten.  Immigration discourses and their impact on multiculturalism: a discursive and experimental study. , 2005, The British journal of social psychology.

[32]  K. Chamberlain,et al.  A trip to the library: homelessness and social inclusion , 2008 .

[33]  A. Radley,et al.  Charitable Giving by Individuals: A Study of Attitudes and Practice , 1995 .

[34]  B. Langer,et al.  The Practice of Everyday Life , 2019, Forms of Thinking in Leopardi’s Zibaldone.

[35]  Catherine Kingfisher.  Discursive constructions of homelessness in a small city in the Canadian prairies: Notes on destructuration, individualization, and the production of (raced and gendered) unmarked categories , 2007 .

[36]  P. Buck,et al.  Media and Professional Interest in Homelessness over 30 Years (1974–2003) , 2004 .

[37]  Michael Billig,et al.  Ideological Dilemmas: A Social Psychology of Everyday Thinking , 1988 .

[38]  N. Heynen,et al.  The Geography of Survival and the Right to the City: Speculations on Surveillance, Legal Innovation, and the Criminalization of Intervention , 2009 .