Social Capital and the Networked Public Sphere: Implications for Political Social Media Sites

This paper presents a theoretical lens for research on social media use in eParticipation, along with an example case study. The idea of the public sphere and how it can be applied to eParticipation research is presented. The public sphere is discussed in relation to Cast ell's notion of the network society as the "networked public sphere", and social capital is introduced as a possible explanation for why some people choose to participate while others refrain from doing so. An example case is presented and analysed in terms of the public sphere and social capital. Finally, the argument is made that working public spheres, enacted through various online social media platforms, can contribute to increased social capital and increased political debate among citizens.

[1]  Don Tapscott,et al.  Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything , 2006 .

[2]  J. Knote.  Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community , 2004 .

[3]  Pamela Paxton.  Is Social Capital Declining in the United States? A Multiple Indicator Assessment1 , 1999, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  D. Barney.  The Network Society , 2004 .

[5]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  The Benefits of Facebook "Friends: " Social Capital and College Students' Use of Online Social Network Sites , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[6]  F. Tönnies.  Community and Association , 1956 .

[7]  Yochai Benkler,et al.  The wealth of networks: how social production transforms markets and freedom , 2006 .

[8]  M. Castells.  The New Public Sphere: Global Civil Society, Communication Networks, and Global Governance , 2008 .

[9]  Hans-Jörg Trenz,et al.  The Democratizing Dynamics of a European Public Sphere , 2004 .

[10]  Roger Hurwitz,et al.  Who Needs Politics? Who Needs People? The Ironies of Democracy in Cyberspace , 1999 .

[11]  E. Trist.  The Evolution of Socio-Technical Systems: A Conceptual Framework and an Action Research Program , 1981 .

[12]  Slavko Splichal.  In search of a strong European public sphere: some critical observations on conceptualizations of publicness and the (European) public sphere , 2006 .

[13]  A. Kluge,et al.  Public Sphere and Experience: Toward an Analysis of the Bourgeois and Proletarian Public Sphere , 1993 .

[14]  Zizi Papacharissi.  The virtual sphere , 2002, New Media Soc..

[15]  Todd Graham,et al.  Needles in a Haystack , 2008 .

[16]  M. Castells.  The rise of the network society , 1996 .

[17]  Manuel A. Pérez-Quiñones,et al.  Local conversations 2.0 , 2009, D.GO.

[18]  Reinhard Riedl,et al.  Top-level decisions through public deliberation on the internet: evidence from the evolution of Java governance , 2009, D.GO.

[19]  Antje Gimmler.  Deliberative democracy, the public sphere and the internet , 2001 .

[20]  John Keane.  Structural Transformations of the Public Sphere , 2020, The Information Society Reader.

[21]  Jeffrey S. Juris,et al.  Networked social movements: global movements for global justice , 2004 .

[22]  Ailsa Kolsaker.  Third Way e-Government: The Case for Local Devolution , 2005, TCGOV.

[23]  Lincoln Dahlberg.  The Internet and Democratic Discourse: Exploring The Prospects of Online Deliberative Forums Extending the Public Sphere , 2001 .

[24]  Gert Tinggaard Svendsen,et al.  Social kapital: En Introduktion , 2006 .

[25]  Scott P. Robertson,et al.  The social life of social networks: Facebook linkage patterns in the 2008 U.S. presidential election , 2009, D.GO.

[26]  J. Onyx,et al.  Measuring Social Capital in Five Communities , 2000 .

[27]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Analyzing Social Media Networks with NodeXL: Insights from a Connected World , 2010 .

[28]  M. Poster.  CyberDemocracy: Internet and the Public Sphere , 2013 .

[29]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  Characterizing eParticipation , 2007, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[30]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area , 2008, Gov. Inf. Q..

[31]  Sherah Kurnia,et al.  Social Capital in Information and Communications Technology Research: Past, Present, and Future , 2009, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Peter Dahlgren.  The Internet, Public Spheres, and Political Communication: Dispersion and Deliberation , 2005 .

[33]  J. V. Dijk.  The Network Society: Social Aspects of New Media , 2005 .

[34]  D. Romer,et al.  Realizing the Social Internet? Online Social Networking Meets Offline Civic Engagement , 2009 .

[35]  Peter Muhlberger,et al.  Human Agency and the Revitalization of the Public Sphere , 2005 .

[36]  Graham Vickery,et al.  Participative Web And User-Created Content: Web 2.0 Wikis and Social Networking , 2007 .

[37]  Tero Päivärinta,et al.  Metacommunication Patterns in Online Communities , 2009, HCI.

[38]  Rachel K. Gibson,et al.  Online Participation in the UK: Testing a ‘Contextualised’ Model of Internet Effects 1 , 2005 .

[39]  J. Habermas,et al.  The structural transformation of the public sphere : an inquiryinto a category of bourgeois society , 1991 .

[40]  M. Crotty.  The Foundations of Social Research: Meaning and Perspective in the Research Process , 1998 .

[41]  Susan O'Donnell,et al.  Analysing the Internet and the Public Sphere: The Case of Womenslink , 2001 .

[42]  Francis Fukuyama,et al.  Social Capital and Civil Society , 2000 .

[43]  Gianluca Misuraca,et al.  e-Government 2015: exploring m-government scenarios, between ICT-driven experiments and citizen-centric implications , 2009, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..