Hybrid Fault Detection in Power Systems

This paper proposes a novel hybrid technique for machine-learning-based fault detection in power systems. Since typical power systems, such as the considered example of a buck converter, are complex and highly nonlinear, with parameters changing over time, it is unrealistic to derive a fully accurate mathematical model, covering every physical aspect of the system. Hence, fully deterministic model-based methods, a common approach for fault detection with buck and other DC-DC converters, suffer from modeling inaccuracies and consequential issues in precision and reliability. To overcome these problems, we propose a hybrid approach, consisting of two stages. The first stage carries out a model-based estimation of significant system parameters. However, instead of treating these parameters as deterministic ground-truth information, we treat them as a statistical quantity, with associated uncertainty. Hence, we add a second, statistical classification stage, using them as features to classify the converter condition as normal or faulty, either by a Bayesian or a deep-neural-network-based classifier. The proposed method was applied on a buck converter connected to a local distribution grid, for which we can demonstrate high accuracy in the detection of even small parameter changes.

[1]  Guillermo R. Bossio,et al.  Model-based Fault Detection and Isolation in a MPPT BOOST converter for photovoltaic systems , 2016, IECON 2016 - 42nd Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society.

[2]  F. Alonge,et al.  Nonlinear Modeling of DC/DC Converters Using the Hammerstein's Approach , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[3]  Jean-Philippe Martin,et al.  DC–DC Converters Dynamic Modeling With State Observer-Based Parameter Estimation , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[4]  K. Low,et al.  Low Sampling Rate Online Parameters Monitoring of DC–DC Converters for Predictive-Maintenance Using Biogeography-Based Optimization , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[5]  Paul Stewart,et al.  Condition Parameter Estimation for Photovoltaic Buck Converters Based on Adaptive Model Observers , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[6]  Quan Sun,et al.  Reliability Assessment of Metallized Film Capacitors using Reduced Degradation Test Sample , 2013, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[7]  Afshin Izadian,et al.  Model-based fault diagnosis of a DC-DC boost converters using hidden Markov model , 2013, IEEE International Conference on Electro-Information Technology , EIT 2013.

[8]  Maher Al-Greer,et al.  Real-Time Parameter Estimation of DC–DC Converters Using a Self-Tuned Kalman Filter , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[9]  S. Santhosh ANFIS based HVDC control and fault identification of HVDC converter , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Emerging Trends in Electrical Engineering and Energy Management (ICETEEEM).

[10]  A. Amaral,et al.  Parameter Estimation of a DC/DC Buck converter using a continuous time model , 2007, 2007 European Conference on Power Electronics and Applications.

[11]  Mohamed Ahmeid,et al.  Parameter estimation of a DC-DC converter using a Kalman filter approach , 2014 .

[12]  P.T. Krein,et al.  Real-time system identification for load monitoring and transient handling of Dc-Dc supplies , 2008, 2008 IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference.

[13]  Kevin N. Gurney,et al.  An introduction to neural networks , 2018 .

[14]  Mor Mordechai Peretz,et al.  Time-domain identification of pulse-width modulated converters , 2012 .

[15]  Jason Poon,et al.  Model-Based Fault Detection and Identification for Switching Power Converters , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[16]  Martin Fodslette Møller,et al.  A scaled conjugate gradient algorithm for fast supervised learning , 1993, Neural Networks.

[17]  Jin-Ding Cai,et al.  Application of Hidden Markov Model to Fault Diagnosis of Power Electronic Circuit , 2009, 2009 IEEE Circuits and Systems International Conference on Testing and Diagnosis.