Seismic Performance Assessment of Steel Frames with Shape Memory Alloy Connections. Part I — Analysis and Seismic Demands

This article is the first of two companion articles that evaluate the seismic performance of steel moment-resisting frames with innovative beam-to-column connections that incorporate shape memory alloys (SMAs) to dissipate energy and provide recentering effectively during large earthquakes. Two types of SMA elements are considered: (1) superelastic SMA elements with recentering capability and (2) martensitic SMA elements with high energy dissipation capacity. This article describes the fundamental engineering characteristics of these SMA connections, their modeling in connections for nonlinear dynamic finite element analysis of building frames, and the validation of these connection models using data from full-scale experimental tests that were performed in previous research at Georgia Institute of Technology. Using three- and nine-story partially restrained (PR) moment frames selected as case studies from the SAC Phase II Project, nonlinear time history analyses of frames with and without SMA connections were conducted using suites of ground acceleration records. The beneficial effects of SMA connections on peak and residual deformation demands are quantified and discussed.

[1]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  CYCLIC PROPERTIES OF SUPERELASTIC SHAPE MEMORY ALLOY WIRES AND BARS , 2004 .

[2]  Jianlin Song,et al.  Seismic Reliability of Special Moment Steel Frames with Welded Connections: I , 1999 .

[3]  Johnny Sun,et al.  Development of Ground Motion Time Histories for Phase 2 of the FEMA/SAC Steel Project , 1997 .

[4]  Kazuhiko Kasai,et al.  Performance of PR Moment Frame Buildings in UBC Seismic Zones 3 and 4 , 2000 .

[5]  Roberto T. Leon,et al.  Steel Beam-Column Connections using Shape Memory Alloys , 2004 .

[6]  J. Ocel Cyclic behavior of steel beam-column connections with shape memory alloy connecting elements , 2002 .

[7]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Seismic retrofit of simply supported bridges using shape memory alloys , 2002 .

[8]  Roberto T. Leon,et al.  Stiffness Modeling of Bolted T-Stub Connection Components , 2001 .

[9]  Berk Taftali Probabilistic seismic demand assessment of steel frames with shape memory alloy connections , 2007 .

[10]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Structural Engineering with NiTi . II: Mechanical Behavior and Scaling , 2007 .

[11]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Structural engineering with niti. I Basic materials characterization , 2007 .

[12]  Riccardo Zandonini,et al.  Experimental analysis and modelling of semi-rigid steel joints under cyclic reversal loading , 1996 .

[13]  Douglas A. Foutch,et al.  Translating Research to Practice: FEMA/SAC Performance-Based Design Procedures , 2003 .

[14]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Sensitivity of Seismic Applications to Different Shape Memory Alloy Models , 2008 .

[15]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Effect of mechanical training on the properties of superelastic shape memory alloys for seismic applications , 2005, SPIE Smart Structures and Materials + Nondestructive Evaluation and Health Monitoring.

[16]  Jason McCormick,et al.  Cyclic Behavior of Shape Memory Alloys: Materials Characterization and Optimization , 2006 .

[17]  T. W. Duerig,et al.  Engineering Aspects of Shape Memory Alloys , 1990 .

[18]  C. Allin Cornell,et al.  SEISMIC PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR STEEL MOMENT FRAMES , 2002 .

[19]  Jon Hoeksma,et al.  Structural engineering. , 2003, The Health service journal.

[20]  W. J. Hall,et al.  Recommended Seismic Evaluation and Upgrade Criteria for Existing Welded Steel Moment-Frame Buildings , 2000 .

[21]  Bruce F. Maison,et al.  How Safe Are Pre-Northridge WSMFs? A Case Study of the SAC Los Angeles Nine-Story Building , 1999 .

[22]  Michael D. Engelhardt,et al.  Retrofit of Pre-Northridge Moment-Resisting Connections , 2000 .

[23]  Kazuo Inoue,et al.  Classification of damage to steel buildings observed in the 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu earthquake , 1998 .

[24]  Akshay Gupta,et al.  Behavior of Ductile SMRFs at Various Seismic Hazard Levels , 2000 .

[25]  Sheng-Jin Chen,et al.  Enhancement of Ductility of Existing Seismic Steel Moment Connections , 2001 .

[26]  James A. Swanson,et al.  BOLTED STEEL CONNECTIONS: TESTS ON T-STUB COMPONENTS , 2000 .