Optimization-inspired deep learning high-resolution inversion for seismic data

Seismic high-resolution processing plays a critical role in reservoir target detection. As one of the most common approaches, regularization can achieve a high-resolution inversion result. However, the performance of regularization depends on the settings of the associated parameters and constraint functions. Further, it is difficult to solve an objective function with complex constraints, and it requires designing an optimization algorithm. In addition, existing algorithms have high computational complexity, which impedes the inversion of the large data volume. To address these problems, an optimization-inspired deep learning inversion solver is proposed to solve the blind high-resolution inverse (BHRI) problems of various seismic wavelets rapidly, called BHRI-Net. The method builds on ideas from classic regularization theory and recent advances in deep learning, and it makes full use of prior information encoded in the forward operator and noise model to learn an accurate mapping relationship. It unrolls the alternating iterative BHRI algorithm into a deep neural network, and it applies the convolutional neural network to learn proximal mappings, in which all parameters of the BHRI algorithm are learned from training data. Further, the proposed network can be split into two parts and incorporate the transfer learning strategy to invert field data, which increases the flexibility of the proposed network and reduces training time. Finally, the tests on synthetic and field data show that the proposed method can effectively invert the high-resolution data and seismic wavelet from observation data with improved accuracy and high computational efficiency.

[1]  Runze Li,et al.  Tuning parameter selectors for the smoothly clipped absolute deviation method. , 2007, Biometrika.

[2]  Jinghuai Gao,et al.  An Adaptive Time-Varying Seismic Super-Resolution Inversion Based on Lp Regularization , 2021, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[3]  Mauricio D. Sacchi,et al.  Reweighting strategies in seismic deconvolution , 1997 .

[4]  T. Alkhalifah,et al.  Regularized elastic full-waveform inversion using deep learning , 2019, GEOPHYSICS.

[5]  A. C. Faul,et al.  Bayesian Feature Learning for Seismic Compressive Sensing and Denoising , 2017 .

[6]  Yonina C. Eldar,et al.  Efficient and Interpretable Deep Blind Image Deblurring Via Algorithm Unrolling , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging.

[7]  Zongben Xu,et al.  An Optimized Deep Network Representation of Multimutation Differential Evolution and its Application in Seismic Inversion , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[8]  Jinghuai Gao,et al.  Multitrace Semiblind Nonstationary Deconvolution , 2019, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[9]  Yuji Kim,et al.  Geophysical inversion versus machine learning in inverse problems , 2018, The Leading Edge.

[10]  Yuan Xiao,et al.  Using generative adversarial networks to improve deep-learning fault interpretation networks , 2018, The Leading Edge.

[11]  Jianwei Ma,et al.  Simultaneous dictionary learning and denoising for seismic data , 2014 .

[12]  Mathews Jacob,et al.  MoDL: Model-Based Deep Learning Architecture for Inverse Problems , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  Jianwei Ma,et al.  Deep-learning inversion: a next generation seismic velocity-model building method , 2019, GEOPHYSICS.

[14]  Jinghuai Gao,et al.  Seismic sparse-spike deconvolution via Toeplitz-sparse matrix factorization , 2016 .

[15]  C. Vogel Non-convergence of the L-curve regularization parameter selection method , 1996 .

[16]  Sanyi Yuan,et al.  Sparse Bayesian Learning-Based Time-Variant Deconvolution , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[17]  Thomas Brox,et al.  U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation , 2015, MICCAI.

[18]  Zhaoying Bian,et al.  Optimizing a Parameterized Plug-and-Play ADMM for Iterative Low-Dose CT Reconstruction , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  Yuan Yu,et al.  TensorFlow: A system for large-scale machine learning , 2016, OSDI.

[20]  Bernard Ghanem,et al.  ISTA-Net: Interpretable Optimization-Inspired Deep Network for Image Compressive Sensing , 2017, 2018 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[21]  Israel Cohen,et al.  Multichannel Deconvolution of Seismic Signals Using Statistical MCMC Methods , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[22]  Peter Craven,et al.  Smoothing noisy data with spline functions , 1978 .

[23]  Muhammad Sajid,et al.  A fast and simple method of spectral enhancement , 2014 .

[24]  Jinghuai Gao,et al.  A new approach for extracting the amplitude spectrum of the seismic wavelet from the seismic traces , 2017 .

[25]  Xin Fan,et al.  Deep Proximal Unrolling: Algorithmic Framework, Convergence Analysis and Applications , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[26]  Mauricio D. Sacchi,et al.  A Fast and Automatic Sparse Deconvolution in the Presence of Outliers , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[27]  Zongben Xu,et al.  ADMM-CSNet: A Deep Learning Approach for Image Compressive Sensing , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[28]  Marcelo Gattass,et al.  Lobbes: An Algorithm for Sparse-Spike Deconvolution , 2017, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[29]  Jonas Adler,et al.  Solving ill-posed inverse problems using iterative deep neural networks , 2017, ArXiv.

[30]  Nasser Kazemi,et al.  Automatic blind deconvolution with Toeplitz-structured sparse total least squares , 2018, GEOPHYSICS.

[31]  Per Christian Hansen,et al.  Analysis of Discrete Ill-Posed Problems by Means of the L-Curve , 1992, SIAM Rev..

[32]  Zongben Xu,et al.  Model-driven deep-learning , 2018 .