A comparison of moment-based methods of estimation for the log Pearson type 3 distribution

The log Pearson type 3 distribution is a very important model in statistical hydrology, especially for modeling annual flood series. In this paper we compare the various methods based on moments for estimating quantiles of this distribution. Besides the methods of direct and mixed moments which were found most successful in previous studies and the well-known indirect method of moments, we develop generalized direct moments and generalized mixed moments methods and a new method of adaptive mixed moments. The last method chooses the orders of two moments for the original observations by utilizing information contained in the sample itself. The results of Monte Carlo experiments demonstrated the superiority of this method in estimating flood events of high return periods when a large sample is available and in estimating flood events of low return periods regardless of the sample size. In addition, a comparison of simulation and asymptotic results shows that the adaptive method may be used for the construction of meaningful confidence intervals for design events based on the asymptotic theory even with small samples. The simulation results also point to the specific members of the class of generalized moments estimates which maintain small values for bias and/or mean square error.

[1]  Donthamsetti Veerabhadra Rao Log Pearson Type 3 Distribution: Method of Mixed Moments , 1980 .

[2]  B. Bobée,et al.  The gamma family and derived distributions applied in hydrology , 1991 .

[3]  Taha B. M. J. Ouarda,et al.  Approximate Confidence Intervals for Quantiles of Gamma and Generalized Gamma Distributions , 1998 .

[4]  B. Bobée,et al.  The generalized method of moments as applied to problems of flood frequency analysis: Some practical results for the log-Pearson type 3 distribution , 1987 .

[5]  M. A. Benson,et al.  Uniform Flood-Frequency Estimating Methods for Federal Agencies , 1968 .

[6]  Variance of the T-year event in the log Pearson type-3 distribution , 1986 .

[7]  I. A. Koutrouvelis,et al.  Estimation in the Pearson type 3 distribution , 1999 .

[8]  Fahim Ashkar,et al.  Generalized Method of Moments Applied to LP3 Distribution , 1988 .

[9]  Huynh Ngoc Phine,et al.  LOG PEARSON TYPE-3 DISTRIBUTION: PARAMETER ESTIMATION , 1983 .

[10]  Fitting the Pearson type 3 distribution in practice , 1977 .

[11]  B. Bobée Comment on ‘Fitting the Pearson type 3 distribution in practice’ by J. Buckett and F. R. Oliver , 1979 .

[12]  K. Arora,et al.  A comparative evaluation of the estimators of the log Pearson type (LP) 3 distribution , 1989 .

[13]  Jery R. Stedinger,et al.  Confidence Interval for Design Floods with Estimated Skew Coefficient , 1991 .

[14]  W. L. Lane,et al.  An algorithm for computing moments‐based flood quantile estimates when historical flood information is available , 1997 .

[15]  B. Bobée,et al.  The Log Pearson type 3 distribution and its application in hydrology , 1975 .

[16]  B. Bobée Sample error of T‐year events commuted by fitting a Pearson type 3 distribution , 1973 .

[17]  Donthamsetti Veerabhadra Rao Estimating Log Pearson Parameters by Mixed Moments , 1983 .

[18]  S. Burges,et al.  Sampling properties of parameter estimates for the log Pearson type 3 distribution, using moments in real space , 1981 .

[19]  S. Burges,et al.  Approximate estimation of the derivative of a standard gamma quantile for use in confidence interval estimates , 1981 .