Examining high-resolution survey methods for monitoring cliff erosion at an operational scale

This paper aims to compare models from terrestrial laser scanning (TLS), terrestrial photogrammetry (TP), and unmanned aerial vehicle photogrammetry (UAVP) surveys to evaluate their potential in cliff erosion monitoring. TLS has commonly been used to monitor cliff-face erosion (monitoring since 2010 in Normandy) because it guarantees results of high precision. Due to some uncertainties and limitations of TLS, TP and UAVP can be seen as alternative methods. First, the texture quality of the photogrammetry models is better than that of TLS which could be useful for analysis and interpretation. Second, a comparison between the TLS model and UAV or TP models shows that the mean error value is mainly from 0.013 to 0.03 m, which meets the precision requirements for monitoring cliff erosion by rock falls and debris falls. However, TP is more sensitive to roughness than UAVP, which increases the data standard deviation. Thus, UAVP appears to be more reliable in our study and provides a larger spatial coverage, enabling a larger cliff-face section to be monitored with a regular resolution. Nevertheless, the method remains dependent on the weather conditions and the number of operators is not reduced. Third, even though UAVP has more advantages than TP, the methods could be interchangeable when no pilot is available, when weather conditions are bad or when high reactivity is needed.

[1]  Giordano Teza,et al.  Terrestrial Laser Scanner Resolution: Numerical Simulations and Experiments on Spatial Sampling Optimization , 2011, Remote. Sens..

[2]  Carlos Castillo,et al.  Image-based surface reconstruction in geomorphometry - merits, limits and developments , 2016 .

[3]  Mike Kirkby,et al.  Reconstructing flash flood magnitudes using ‘Structure-from-Motion’: A rapid assessment tool , 2014 .

[4]  Jürgen Schmidt,et al.  Small-Scale Surface Reconstruction and Volume Calculation of Soil Erosion in Complex Moroccan Gully Morphology Using Structure from Motion , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[5]  Edward W. Bork,et al.  Influence of Vegetation, Slope, and Lidar Sampling Angle on DEM Accuracy , 2006 .

[6]  Garry Burton,et al.  TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNER , 2007 .

[7]  Emmanuel Augereau,et al.  Adequacy of pseudo-direct georeferencing of terrestrial laser scanning data for coastal landscape surveying against indirect georeferencing , 2017 .

[8]  M. James,et al.  Ultra‐rapid topographic surveying for complex environments: the hand‐held mobile laser scanner (HMLS) , 2014 .

[9]  S. Robson,et al.  Mitigating systematic error in topographic models derived from UAV and ground‐based image networks , 2014 .

[10]  A. Young.  Recent deep-seated coastal landsliding at San Onofre State Beach, California , 2015 .

[11]  Andreas Terzis,et al.  Landslide Detection , 2020 .

[12]  D. Stead,et al.  Quantifying discontinuity orientation and persistence on high mountain rock slopes and large landslides using terrestrial remote sensing techniques , 2009 .

[13]  Alberto Guarnieri,et al.  State of the Art of Ground and Aerial Laser Scanning Technologies for High-Resolution Topography of the Earth Surface , 2013 .

[14]  H. Maas,et al.  Multi‐temporal UAV data for automatic measurement of rill and interrill erosion on loess soil , 2015 .

[15]  O. Maquaire,et al.  High-resolution monitoring of complex coastal morphology changes: cross-efficiency of SfM and TLS-based survey (Vaches-Noires cliffs, Normandy, France) , 2018, Landslides.

[16]  Emmanuel Augereau,et al.  Retreat rates, modalities and agents responsible for erosion along the coastal chalk cliffs of Upper Normandy: The contribution of terrestrial laser scanning , 2015 .

[17]  Michel Jaboyedoff,et al.  "Use of 3D Point Clouds in Geohazards" Special Issue: Current Challenges and Future Trends , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[18]  D. Petley,et al.  Quantifying the environmental controls on erosion of a hard rock cliff , 2015 .

[19]  N. Sitar,et al.  Processes of coastal bluff erosion in weakly lithified sands, Pacifica, California, USA , 2008 .

[20]  Antonio Galgaro,et al.  Terrestrial laser scanner to detect landslide displacement fields: a new approach , 2007 .

[21]  Michael Lim,et al.  Quantifying the Controls and Influence of Tide and Wave Impacts on Coastal Rock Cliff Erosion , 2011 .

[22]  L. Naylor,et al.  Rock coast geomorphology: Recent advances and future research directions , 2010 .

[23]  Derek D. Lichti,et al.  Registration and Calibration , 2010 .

[24]  Stéphane Costa,et al.  Statistical and empirical analyses of the triggers of coastal chalk cliff failure , 2015 .

[25]  B. Laignel.  Les altérites à silex de l'ouest du Bassin de Paris : caractérisation lithologique, genèse et utilisation potentielle comme granulats , 1997 .

[26]  Mona Hess,et al.  Structure from Motion: Photogrammetry , 2017 .

[27]  Myron L. Braunstein,et al.  Structure from Motion , 2015, The Encyclopedia of Archaeological Sciences.

[28]  P. Beckmann.  Signal degeneration in laser beams propagated through a turbulent atmosphere , 1965 .

[29]  Rory N. Mortimore,et al.  Lithostratigraphy and biostratigraphy of the lewes and seaford chalks: A link across the Anglo-Paris basin at the Turonian-Senonian boundary , 1987 .

[30]  Falko Kuester,et al.  Comparison of Airborne and Terrestrial Lidar Estimates of Seacliff Erosion in Southern California , 2010 .

[31]  D. Lague,et al.  Accurate 3D comparison of complex topography with terrestrial laser scanner: Application to the Rangitikei canyon (N-Z) , 2013, 1302.1183.

[32]  Tom Edwards,et al.  A 4D Filtering and Calibration Technique for Small-Scale Point Cloud Change Detection with a Terrestrial Laser Scanner , 2015, Remote. Sens..

[33]  M. Westoby,et al.  ‘Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications , 2012 .

[34]  C. Delacourt,et al.  Landslide detection and monitoring capability of boat-based mobile laser scanning along Dieppe coastal cliffs, Normandy , 2015, Landslides.

[35]  M. Hampton.  Gravitational failure of sea cliffs in weakly lithified sediment , 2002 .

[36]  Charles K. Toth,et al.  Improvement of Lidar Data Accuracy Using Lidar-Specific Ground Targets , 2007 .

[37]  Mark W. Smith,et al.  Structure from motion photogrammetry in physical geography , 2016 .

[38]  S. Robson,et al.  Straightforward reconstruction of 3D surfaces and topography with a camera: Accuracy and geoscience application , 2012 .

[39]  Rory N. Mortimore,et al.  Coastal Chalk Cliff Instability , 2006 .

[40]  D. J. Hutchinson,et al.  Bias Correction for View-limited Lidar Scanning of Rock Outcrops for Structural Characterization , 2010 .

[41]  M. Jaboyedoff,et al.  Characterization and monitoring of the Åknes rockslide using terrestrial laser scanning , 2009 .

[42]  Michael E. Hodgson,et al.  Impact of Lidar Nominal Post-spacing on DEM Accuracy and Flood Zone Delineation , 2007 .

[43]  J. Brasington,et al.  Modeling the topography of shallow braided rivers using Structure-from-Motion photogrammetry , 2014 .