Fully Automated Support System for Diagnosis of Breast Cancer in Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography Images

Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM) is a novelty instrumentation for diagnosing of breast cancer, but it can still be considered operator dependent. In this paper, we proposed a fully automatic system as a diagnostic support tool for the clinicians. For each Region Of Interest (ROI), a features set was extracted from low-energy and recombined images by using different techniques. A Random Forest classifier was trained on a selected subset of significant features by a sequential feature selection algorithm. The proposed Computer-Automated Diagnosis system is tested on 48 ROIs extracted from 53 patients referred to Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II” of Bari (Italy) from the breast cancer screening phase between March 2017 and June 2018. The present method resulted highly performing in the prediction of benign/malignant ROIs with median values of sensitivity and specificity of 87.5% and 91.7%, respectively. The performance was high compared to the state-of-the-art, even with a moderate/marked level of parenchymal background. Our classification model outperformed the human reader, by increasing the specificity over 8%. Therefore, our system could represent a valid support tool for radiologists for interpreting CESM images, both reducing the false positive rate and limiting biopsies and surgeries.

[1]  Biswajit Pathak,et al.  TEXTURE ANALYSIS BASED ON THEGRAY-LEVEL CO-OCCURRENCEMATRIX CONSIDERING POSSIBLEORIENTATIONS , 2013 .

[2]  David W. Aha,et al.  A Comparative Evaluation of Sequential Feature Selection Algorithms , 1995, AISTATS.

[3]  H. D. de Koning,et al.  Cost‐effectiveness of digital mammography screening before the age of 50 in The Netherlands , 2015, International journal of cancer.

[4]  Andreas Christmann,et al.  Support vector machines , 2008, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook.

[5]  D. Taylor,et al.  Contrast‐enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) and contrast enhanced MRI (CEMRI): Patient preferences and tolerance , 2015, Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology.

[6]  S Tangaro,et al.  A Gradient-Based Approach for Breast DCE-MRI Analysis , 2018, BioMed research international.

[7]  S Gommers,et al.  Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in recalls from the Dutch breast cancer screening program: validation of results in a large multireader, multicase study , 2016, European Radiology.

[8]  Sabri Boughorbel,et al.  Optimal classifier for imbalanced data using Matthews Correlation Coefficient metric , 2017, PloS one.

[9]  J. James,et al.  Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography (CESM) , 2014 .

[10]  J. Wildberger,et al.  The Quality of Tumor Size Assessment by Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography and the Benefit of Additional Breast MRI , 2015, Journal of Cancer.

[11]  E.E. Pissaloux,et al.  Image Processing , 1994, Proceedings. Second Euromicro Workshop on Parallel and Distributed Processing.

[12]  A. Jardine,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening policies using simulation. , 2015, Breast.

[13]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[14]  R. Hubbard,et al.  Costs of diagnostic and preoperative workup with and without breast MRI in older women with a breast cancer diagnosis , 2016, BMC Health Services Research.

[15]  Jiri Matas,et al.  Robust wide-baseline stereo from maximally stable extremal regions , 2004, Image Vis. Comput..

[16]  Edward Hendrick,et al.  Comparison between Breast MRI and Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography , 2015, Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research.

[17]  Kathleen A Cronin,et al.  Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, part I: National cancer statistics , 2018, Cancer.

[18]  A. Jemal,et al.  Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries , 2018, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[19]  Carlo Tomasi,et al.  Good features to track , 1994, 1994 Proceedings of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[20]  Roberto Orecchia,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast: recommendations from the EUSOMA working group. , 2010, European journal of cancer.

[21]  Samuel J. Magny,et al.  Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System , 2020, Definitions.

[22]  L Li,et al.  Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) versus breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): A retrospective comparison in 66 breast lesions. , 2017, Diagnostic and interventional imaging.

[23]  Jennifer D. Brooks,et al.  Background parenchymal enhancement at breast MR imaging and breast cancer risk. , 2011, Radiology.

[24]  Bernd Hamm,et al.  Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: Does mammography provide additional clinical benefits or can some radiation exposure be avoided? , 2014, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[25]  Nahum Kiryati,et al.  Classification of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) images , 2018, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[26]  Joachim E. Wildberger,et al.  Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography in patients referred from the breast cancer screening programme , 2014, European Radiology.

[27]  Francesca Caumo,et al.  An exploratory radiomics analysis on digital breast tomosynthesis in women with mammographically negative dense breasts. , 2018, Breast.

[28]  J. Wildberger,et al.  Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography as work-up tool in patients recalled from breast cancer screening has low risks and might hold clinical benefits. , 2017, European journal of radiology.

[29]  Paola Clauser,et al.  Mammography: an update of the EUSOBI recommendations on information for women , 2016, Insights into Imaging.

[30]  B. Matthews Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme. , 1975, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[31]  David G. Lowe,et al.  Object recognition from local scale-invariant features , 1999, Proceedings of the Seventh IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision.

[32]  Teresa Wu,et al.  Computer-aided diagnosis of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: A feasibility study. , 2018, European journal of radiology.

[33]  W. Youden,et al.  Index for rating diagnostic tests , 1950, Cancer.

[34]  M. Krohn,et al.  Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography versus MRI: Initial results in the detection of breast cancer and assessment of tumour size , 2013, European Radiology.

[35]  Ping Yang,et al.  Diagnostic Value of Contrast‐Enhanced Spectral Mammography for Screening Breast Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis , 2018, Clinical breast cancer.

[36]  John M Boone,et al.  Contrast-enhanced dedicated breast CT: initial clinical experience. , 2010, Radiology.

[37]  Donato Cascio,et al.  Comparative study of feature classification methods for mass lesion recognition in digitized mammograms , 2007 .

[38]  S Tangaro,et al.  GPCALMA: a Grid-based Tool for Mammographic Screening , 2004, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[39]  P. Sathyanarayana,et al.  Image Texture Feature Extraction Using GLCM Approach , 2013 .

[40]  D. Taylor,et al.  Could parenchymal enhancement on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) represent a new breast cancer risk factor? Correlation with known radiology risk factors. , 2017, Clinical radiology.

[41]  M. Sormani,et al.  A prospective comparative trial of adjunct screening with tomosynthesis or ultrasound in women with mammography-negative dense breasts (ASTOUND-2). , 2018, European journal of cancer.

[42]  Tom Drummond,et al.  Fusing points and lines for high performance tracking , 2005, Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV'05) Volume 1.

[43]  J. Ryś,et al.  Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography: Comparison with Conventional Mammography and Histopathology in 152 Women , 2014, Korean journal of radiology.

[44]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  A Theory for Multiresolution Signal Decomposition: The Wavelet Representation , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[45]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[46]  J. Kaplan,et al.  Comparison of Background Parenchymal Enhancement at Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography and Breast MR Imaging. , 2017, Radiology.

[47]  Yun-Chung Cheung,et al.  Diagnostic performance of dual-energy contrast-enhanced subtracted mammography in dense breasts compared to mammography alone: interobserver blind-reading analysis , 2014, European Radiology.

[48]  Tony Lindeberg,et al.  Scale Invariant Feature Transform , 2012, Scholarpedia.

[49]  M. Lobbes,et al.  Reply to Tagliafico AS, Bignotti B, Rossi F, et al. , 2017, Breast.

[50]  H. B. Mann,et al.  On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other , 1947 .

[51]  Tom Drummond,et al.  Machine Learning for High-Speed Corner Detection , 2006, ECCV.

[52]  Sabina Sonia Tangaro,et al.  A Combined Approach of Multiscale Texture Analysis and Interest Point/Corner Detectors for Microcalcifications Diagnosis , 2018, IWBBIO.

[53]  P. Slanetz,et al.  Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) versus MRI in the high-risk screening setting: patient preferences and attitudes. , 2017, Clinical imaging.

[54]  Roland Siegwart,et al.  BRISK: Binary Robust invariant scalable keypoints , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision.

[55]  John Lewin,et al.  Contrast Enhanced Spectral Mammography: A Review. , 2018, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[56]  Alessio Signori,et al.  Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: Systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2016, Breast.

[57]  J. Wildberger,et al.  Evaluation of low-energy contrast-enhanced spectral mammography images by comparing them to full-field digital mammography using EUREF image quality criteria , 2015, European Radiology.

[58]  Francesco Fauci,et al.  A massive lesion detection algorithm in mammography. , 2005, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.