On choice and effect of weight matrix for response sensitivity-based damage identification with measurement and model errors

Abstract This paper aims to present a thorough view on the choice and effect of the weight matrix for response sensitivity-based damage identification with measurement and/or model errors. The derivation of the optimal weight matrix is mainly twofold. On the one hand, when only measurement errors are involved, the optimal weight matrix is found to be inverse proportional to the measurement error covariance by minimizing the expectation of squares error of the whole identification results. On the other hand, if model errors are additionally considered, the optimal weight matrix then depends not only on the measurement error covariance, but also on the model error covariance. Further analysis reveals that the optimal weight matrix can also make the ‘relative error’—square-root of expectation of squares error in every individual damage parameter minimized. Then, the effect of the proposed optimal weight matrix with measurement and/or model errors is studied on two typical examples—a plane frame and a simply-supported plate. Results show that when hybrid types of measurement data—accelerations, displacements and/or eigenfrequencies are used or when the response data is sensitive to model errors, the optimal weight matrix should be invoked to get reasonably good identification results and the improvements brought by the optimal weight matrix are substantial. The whole work shall be instructive for damage identification when different types of measurements are available and when model errors are non-negligible.

[1]  Y. M. Chen,et al.  Hybrid sensitivity matrix for damage identification in axially functionally graded beams , 2017 .

[2]  M. Grédiac,et al.  Assessment of Digital Image Correlation Measurement Errors: Methodology and Results , 2009 .

[3]  Jorge J. Moré,et al.  The Levenberg-Marquardt algo-rithm: Implementation and theory , 1977 .

[4]  Per Christian Hansen,et al.  REGULARIZATION TOOLS: A Matlab package for analysis and solution of discrete ill-posed problems , 1994, Numerical Algorithms.

[5]  Li Wang,et al.  An enhanced response sensitivity approach for structural damage identification: convergence and performance , 2017 .

[6]  R. Clough,et al.  Dynamics Of Structures , 1975 .

[7]  Gui-Rong Liu,et al.  Flaw detection in sandwich plates based on time-harmonic response using genetic algorithm , 2001 .

[8]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  The sensitivity method in finite element model updating: A tutorial (vol 25, pg 2275, 2010) , 2011 .

[9]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  Parameter selection and covariance updating , 2016 .

[10]  O. C. Zienkiewicz,et al.  The Finite Element Method for Solid and Structural Mechanics , 2013 .

[11]  S. S. Law,et al.  Features of dynamic response sensitivity and its application in damage detection , 2007 .

[12]  L. N. Balaam,et al.  Statistical Theory and Methodology in Science and Engineering , 1966 .

[13]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  TIME DOMAIN ANALYSIS FOR DAMAGE DETECTION IN SMART STRUCTURES , 1997 .

[14]  F. Golnaraghi,et al.  A Triaxial Accelerometer Calibration Method Using a Mathematical Model , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[15]  Z. R. Lu,et al.  Structural damage detection using artificial bee colony algorithm with hybrid search strategy , 2016, Swarm Evol. Comput..

[16]  F. Hemez,et al.  Updating finite element dynamic models using an element-by-element sensitivity methodology , 1993 .

[17]  Branislav Titurus,et al.  Regularization in model updating , 2008 .

[18]  Michael Link,et al.  Stochastic model updating—Covariance matrix adjustment from uncertain experimental modal data , 2010 .

[19]  Zhengqi Lu,et al.  Damage identification in plates using finite element model updating in time domain , 2013 .

[20]  John E. Mottershead,et al.  Finite Element Model Updating in Structural Dynamics , 1995 .

[21]  P. G. Bakir,et al.  Sensitivity-based finite element model updating using constrained optimization with a trust region algorithm , 2007 .

[22]  Wei Fan,et al.  Vibration-based Damage Identification Methods: A Review and Comparative Study , 2011 .

[23]  Than Soe Maung,et al.  Regularised finite element model updating using measured incomplete modal data , 2014 .

[24]  Per Christian Hansen,et al.  Analysis of Discrete Ill-Posed Problems by Means of the L-Curve , 1992, SIAM Rev..

[25]  Michael Link,et al.  Damage identification by multi-model updating in the modal and in the time domain , 2009 .