Comparison of brain network models using cross-frequency coupling and attack strategies

Several neuroimaging studies have suggested that functional brain connectivity networks exhibit “small-world” characteristics, whereas recent studies based on structural data have proposed a “rich-club” organization of brain networks, whereby hubs of high connection density tend to connect among themselves compared to nodes of lower density. In this study, we adopted an “attack strategy” to compare the rich-club and small-world organizations and identify the model that describes best the topology of brain connectivity. We hypothesized that the highest reduction in global efficiency caused by a targeted attack on each model's hubs would reveal the organization that better describes the topology of the underlying brain networks. We applied this approach to magnetoencephalographic data obtained at rest from neurologically intact controls and mild traumatic brain injury patients. Functional connectivity networks were computed using phase-to-amplitude cross-frequency coupling between the δ and β frequency bands. Our results suggest that resting state MEG connectivity networks follow a rich-club organization.

[1]  George Zouridakis,et al.  FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY CHANGES IN MILD TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY ASSESSED USING MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY , 2012 .

[2]  Gustavo Deco,et al.  Rich club organization supports a diverse set of functional network configurations , 2014, NeuroImage.

[3]  N. A. Laskaris,et al.  Transition dynamics of EEG-based network microstates during mental arithmetic and resting wakefulness reflects task-related modulations and developmental changes , 2015, Cognitive Neurodynamics.

[4]  O. Jensen,et al.  Cross-frequency coupling between neuronal oscillations , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  Satu Palva,et al.  Roles of multiscale brain activity fluctuations in shaping the variability and dynamics of psychophysical performance. , 2011, Progress in brain research.

[6]  O. Jensen,et al.  Gamma Power Is Phase-Locked to Posterior Alpha Activity , 2008, PloS one.

[7]  Manolis Tsiknakis,et al.  Synchronization coupling investigation using ICA cluster analysis in resting MEG signals in reading difficulties , 2013, 13th IEEE International Conference on BioInformatics and BioEngineering.

[8]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  FieldTrip: Open Source Software for Advanced Analysis of MEG, EEG, and Invasive Electrophysiological Data , 2010, Comput. Intell. Neurosci..

[9]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[10]  Nitish Thakor,et al.  Cognitive Workload Assessment Based on the Tensorial Treatment of EEG Estimates of Cross-Frequency Phase Interactions , 2014, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  R. Knight,et al.  The functional role of cross-frequency coupling , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[12]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Communication Efficiency and Congestion of Signal Traffic in Large-Scale Brain Networks , 2014, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[13]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[14]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  THE CONTROL OF THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE IN MULTIPLE TESTING UNDER DEPENDENCY , 2001 .

[15]  R. Knight,et al.  Shifts in Gamma Phase–Amplitude Coupling Frequency from Theta to Alpha Over Posterior Cortex During Visual Tasks , 2010, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[16]  Danielle S Bassett,et al.  Cognitive fitness of cost-efficient brain functional networks , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  O. Sporns,et al.  Rich-Club Organization of the Human Connectome , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  O. Sporns,et al.  The economy of brain network organization , 2012, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.