Multi-atlas based segmentation using probabilistic label fusion with adaptive weighting of image similarity measures

Label fusion multi-atlas approaches for image segmentation can give better segmentation results than single atlas methods. We present a multi-atlas label fusion strategy based on probabilistic weighting of distance maps. Relationships between image similarities and segmentation similarities are estimated in a learning phase and used to derive fusion weights that are proportional to the probability for each atlas to improve the segmentation result. The method was tested using a leave-one-out strategy on a database of 21 pre-segmented prostate patients for different image registrations combined with different image similarity scorings. The probabilistic weighting yields results that are equal or better compared to both fusion with equal weights and results using the STAPLE algorithm. Results from the experiments demonstrate that label fusion by weighted distance maps is feasible, and that probabilistic weighted fusion improves segmentation quality more the stronger the individual atlas segmentation quality depends on the corresponding registered image similarity. The regions used for evaluation of the image similarity measures were found to be more important than the choice of similarity measure.

[1]  Jean-Philippe Thirion,et al.  Image matching as a diffusion process: an analogy with Maxwell's demons , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[2]  Ulf Isacsson,et al.  A method to separate the rectum from the prostate during proton beam radiotherapy of prostate cancer patients , 2010, Acta oncologica.

[3]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Adaptive local multi-atlas segmentation: Application to the heart and the caudate nucleus , 2010, Medical Image Anal..

[4]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  elastix: A Toolbox for Intensity-Based Medical Image Registration , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  Stefan Klein,et al.  Automatic segmentation of the prostate in 3D MR images by atlas matching using localized mutual information. , 2008, Medical physics.

[6]  L. R. Dice Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species , 1945 .

[7]  Torsten Rohlfing,et al.  Quo Vadis, Atlas-Based Segmentation? , 2005 .

[8]  Michael J Ackerman,et al.  Engineering and algorithm design for an image processing Api: a technical report on ITK--the Insight Toolkit. , 2002, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[9]  Torsten Rohlfing,et al.  Shape-Based Averaging , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[10]  T. Mackie,et al.  Fast free-form deformable registration via calculus of variations , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Suresh Senan,et al.  Improving target delineation on 4-dimensional CT scans in stage I NSCLC using a deformable registration tool. , 2010, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[12]  Adam Krzyżak,et al.  Methods of combining multiple classifiers and their applications to handwriting recognition , 1992, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[13]  Michael G Jameson,et al.  A review of methods of analysis in contouring studies for radiation oncology , 2010, Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology.

[14]  Anthony P. Reeves,et al.  A comparison of ground truth estimation methods , 2010, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[15]  Henryk Sienkiewicz,et al.  Quo Vadis? , 1967, American Association of Industrial Nurses journal.

[16]  Тараса Шевченка,et al.  Quo vadis? , 2013, Clinical chemistry.

[17]  Mert R. Sabuncu,et al.  A Generative Model for Image Segmentation Based on Label Fusion , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Adaptive Stochastic Gradient Descent Optimisation for Image Registration , 2009, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[19]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Automatic anatomical brain MRI segmentation combining label propagation and decision fusion , 2006, NeuroImage.

[20]  Carlos Ortiz-de-Solorzano,et al.  Combination Strategies in Multi-Atlas Image Segmentation: Application to Brain MR Data , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[21]  M A Deeley,et al.  Comparison of manual and automatic segmentation methods for brain structures in the presence of space-occupying lesions: a multi-expert study , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Multi-Atlas-Based Segmentation With Local Decision Fusion—Application to Cardiac and Aortic Segmentation in CT Scans , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[23]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Multi-atlas based segmentation of brain images: Atlas selection and its effect on accuracy , 2009, NeuroImage.

[24]  Y. Chen,et al.  Image registration via level-set motion: Applications to atlas-based segmentation , 2003, Medical Image Anal..

[25]  William M. Wells,et al.  Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE): an algorithm for the validation of image segmentation , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[26]  Xiao Han,et al.  Clinical validation of atlas-based auto-segmentation of multiple target volumes and normal tissue (swallowing/mastication) structures in the head and neck. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[27]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[28]  Colin Studholme,et al.  An overlap invariant entropy measure of 3D medical image alignment , 1999, Pattern Recognit..

[29]  Grégoire Malandain,et al.  Atlas-based delineation of lymph node levels in head and neck computed tomography images. , 2008, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[30]  Valerie Duay,et al.  Atlas-based Segmentation , 2015 .

[31]  Joshua D. Lawson,et al.  Evaluation of automatic atlas-based lymph node segmentation for head-and-neck cancer. , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.